Bombay High Court Upholds Acquittal in Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Dying Declarations. State's appeal against acquittal for murder under Section 302 IPC dismissed as dying declarations were contradictory and not corroborated by medical evidence.

High Court: Bombay High Court In Favour of Accused
  • 5
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The State of Maharashtra appealed against the acquittal of Balasahib Baburao Shinde by the Additional Sessions Judge, Nashik, for the murder of his wife Anita under Section 302 IPC. The prosecution case was that on the night of 9/10/1996, following a quarrel over vacating premises, the accused asked his wife to burn herself. She poured kerosene on herself, and then the accused also poured kerosene and set her on fire with a matchstick. Anita sustained severe burns and died on 11/10/1996. The trial court acquitted the accused, finding the dying declarations inconsistent. The High Court, in appeal, examined two dying declarations: one recorded by the Executive Magistrate and another by a police officer. The first declaration stated that the accused asked her to burn herself and she poured kerosene, but did not mention the accused pouring kerosene or lighting the match. The second declaration stated that the accused poured kerosene and set her on fire. The court noted that the medical evidence showed 100% burns, making it improbable for the deceased to have made detailed statements. The court also found that the dying declarations were not corroborated by other evidence. The court held that the trial court's acquittal was based on a plausible view of the evidence and that the appellate court should not interfere unless the view is perverse. The appeal was dismissed, and the acquittal was upheld.

Headnote

A) Criminal Law - Murder - Dying Declaration - Inconsistency - The court examined two dying declarations of the deceased which were contradictory regarding the role of the accused - The first declaration stated the accused asked her to burn herself and she poured kerosene, while the second stated the accused poured kerosene and set her on fire - The court held that such inconsistency creates doubt and the prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt - Acquittal upheld (Paras 1-10).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the acquittal of the respondent for the offence of murder under Section 302 IPC was justified given the dying declarations of the deceased.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

Appeal dismissed; acquittal of respondent upheld.

Law Points

  • Dying declaration must be consistent and corroborated
  • Acquittal appeal standard
  • Section 302 IPC
  • Appreciation of evidence in burn cases
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2005 LawText (BOM) (07) 95

Criminal Appeal No.775 of 1997

2005-07-07

V.G. Palshikar, R.C. Chavan

Mr. D.R. More, APP for the State; Mr. S.J. Ghogare & Ms. Anita Y. Patil for respondent

The State of Maharashtra

Balasahib Baburao Shinde

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal appeal against acquittal for murder

Remedy Sought

State sought conviction of respondent for murder under Section 302 IPC

Filing Reason

State appealed against acquittal by trial court

Previous Decisions

Trial court acquitted respondent for offence under Section 302 IPC

Issues

Whether the dying declarations were consistent and reliable Whether the acquittal was perverse and liable to be set aside

Submissions/Arguments

State argued that the dying declarations clearly implicated the accused Respondent argued that the dying declarations were contradictory and unreliable

Ratio Decidendi

Inconsistent dying declarations without corroboration cannot form the basis of conviction; appellate court should not interfere with acquittal unless the view taken by trial court is perverse.

Judgment Excerpts

Taking exception to respondent’s acquittal by learned Additional Sessions Judge, Nashik for an offence punishable under section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, State has appealed. The facts which led to prosecution of the respondent are as under:-

Procedural History

Trial court acquitted respondent for murder under Section 302 IPC; State appealed to High Court.

Acts & Sections

  • Indian Penal Code, 1860: 302
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Upholds Acquittal in Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Dying Declarations. State's appeal against acquittal for murder under Section 302 IPC dismissed as dying declarations were contradictory and not corroborated by medical evidence.
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Testimony of Interested Witnesses and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Section 302 IPC set aside as sole eye-witness was the wife of deceased and her testimony was not corrobor...