Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Cancellation of Caste Certificate for Muslim Claiming Nomadic Tribe Status. Petitioner failed to prove his caste as Shikalgar as his documents showed his caste as Muslim.

High Court: Bombay High Court In Favour of Prosecution
  • 107
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Shaikh Mohd. Yusuf Mohd. Yakub, a Muslim by religion, claimed to be a member of the Shikalgar caste, which is recognized as a Nomadic Tribe. He obtained a caste certificate from the Sub Divisional Officer, Satara on 31/12/2001 and contested an election to the Municipal Council, Satara from a reserved constituency for Scheduled Tribes, and was elected. After the election, his caste certificate was sent to the Divisional Caste Certificate Scrutiny Committee, Pune Division for verification. The scrutiny committee cancelled the caste certificate by an impugned order. The petitioner challenged this order by way of a writ petition before the Bombay High Court. The court noted that the petitioner was born, brought up, and carrying on business in Bombay, and that he secured the caste certificate just a few days before the election. The court observed that the petitioner's own documents, including his school leaving certificate and the birth certificate of his son, showed his caste as Muslim. The court held that the scrutiny committee was justified in cancelling the caste certificate as the petitioner failed to prove that he belongs to the Shikalgar caste. The petition was dismissed with no order as to costs.

Headnote

A) Caste Certificate - Scrutiny - Cancellation - Petitioner, a Muslim by religion, claimed to be a member of Shikalgar caste (Nomadic Tribe) - Caste certificate issued by Sub Divisional Officer was cancelled by scrutiny committee - Held that the committee was justified as the petitioner's documents showed his caste as Muslim and he failed to prove his claim - Petition dismissed (Paras 2-5).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the caste scrutiny committee was justified in cancelling the caste certificate issued to the petitioner claiming to be a member of Shikalgar caste (Nomadic Tribe) when the petitioner is a Muslim by religion and his documents show his caste as Muslim.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The petition is dismissed. Rule discharged. No order as to costs.

Law Points

  • Caste certificate scrutiny
  • burden of proof on claimant
  • cancellation of caste certificate
  • validity of caste certificate for election to reserved constituency
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2005 LawText (BOM) (07) 9

Writ Petition No.4097 of 2005

2005-07-08

A.P. Shah, J.H. Bhatia

R.K. Mendadkar for Petitioner, C.R. Sonawane (AGP) for State, A.J. Bhor for Respondent No.3

Shaikh Mohd. Yusuf Mohd. Yakub

The State of Maharashtra, Divisional Caste Certificate Scrutiny Committee, Pune Division, Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai, Sub-Divisional Officer, Satara, Mohd. Salim Siddiqui, Ahmed Dawood Solanki, Narendra Gohil

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition challenging cancellation of caste certificate by scrutiny committee.

Remedy Sought

Petitioner sought quashing of the order of the caste scrutiny committee cancelling his caste certificate.

Filing Reason

The caste scrutiny committee cancelled the petitioner's caste certificate claiming he is a member of Shikalgar caste (Nomadic Tribe).

Previous Decisions

The caste scrutiny committee cancelled the caste certificate issued by the Sub Divisional Officer.

Issues

Whether the caste scrutiny committee was justified in cancelling the caste certificate of the petitioner.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued that he is a member of Shikalgar caste and the certificate was valid. Respondents argued that the petitioner is a Muslim and his documents show his caste as Muslim, not Shikalgar.

Ratio Decidendi

The burden of proof lies on the claimant to establish his caste. When the claimant's own documents show his caste as Muslim, and he fails to provide evidence to prove his claim of belonging to a Nomadic Tribe, the scrutiny committee is justified in cancelling the caste certificate.

Judgment Excerpts

Though the Petitioner claims to be an original resident of Satara, it appears that he was born and brought up and is carrying on business in Bombay. He secured caste certificate from Sub Divisional Officer on 31/12/01 and within 3 or 4 days prior to that he had filed nomination for election to the Municipal Council, Satara from the reserved constituency for the schedule tribe. The scrutiny committee was justified in cancelling the caste certificate.

Procedural History

The petitioner obtained a caste certificate from Sub Divisional Officer, Satara on 31/12/2001. After his election to the Municipal Council, Satara, the certificate was sent to the Divisional Caste Certificate Scrutiny Committee, Pune Division for verification. The committee cancelled the certificate. The petitioner filed Writ Petition No.4097 of 2005 before the Bombay High Court challenging the cancellation.

Acts & Sections

  • Constitution of India:
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Upholds High Court Quashing Disciplinary Proceedings Initiated Under Rule 55 Civil Services Rules Without Granting Gazetted Officer's Request to Refer Case to Administrative Tribunal. Rule 4(2) of U.P. Disciplinary Proceedings (Administ...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Suit for Specific Performance of Unsigned MOU for Flat Purchase. Contract Not Concluded as Essential Terms Were Not Finalized and MOU Remained Unsigned.