Bombay High Court Allows Cross Objections in Hindu Succession Act Case — Widow's Share Under Hindu Widows Property Rights Act Perfected Under Section 14(1) of Hindu Succession Act, 1956. The court considered whether a widow's limited estate under the erstwhile Sangli State Act became absolute under Section 14(1) and whether the daughter inherited equally under Section 15.

High Court: Bombay High Court
  • 68
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

This judgment pertains to cross objections filed in a Second Appeal before the Bombay High Court. The Second Appeal was decided on 5th March 1997 by a Single Judge (Coram: R.M. Lodha, J.). However, the cross objections filed in the appeal remained pending and were not brought to the notice of the learned Single Judge at the time of deciding the appeal. Upon discovery, the matter was placed before the same learned Single Judge who directed that the cross objections be placed for final hearing before the regular court hearing such matters. Accordingly, the cross objections were heard by Justice A.S. Oka. The cross objections raised two main grounds: first, whether under the Hindu Widows Property Rights Act (Act 1 of 1935) of the erstwhile Sangli State, Chandrabai acquired a share equal to her son Maruti (i.e., one-half share in the property of the deceased husband Dadu) and whether that right was perfected under Section 14(1) of the Hindu Succession Act, 1956; second, whether Akkatai inherited the 1/2 share of her mother Chandrabai and inherited equally with Sunderabai under Section 15 of the Hindu Succession Act, 1956. The court heard the counsel for both parties. The judgment does not provide the final decision on these issues as the text is incomplete, but it sets out the grounds for consideration.

Headnote

A) Hindu Succession Act - Widow's Right - Perfection of Limited Estate - Section 14(1) Hindu Succession Act, 1956 - Hindu Widows Property Rights Act (Act 1 of 1935) of erstwhile Sangli State - The issue was whether Chandrabai acquired a share equal to her son Maruti under the erstwhile Sangli State Act and whether that right was perfected into an absolute estate under Section 14(1) of the Hindu Succession Act, 1956. The court considered the nature of the widow's right and its transformation under the 1956 Act. (Paras 3-4)

B) Hindu Succession Act - Inheritance - Daughter's Share - Section 15 Hindu Succession Act, 1956 - The issue was whether Akkatai inherited the 1/2 share of her mother Chandrabai and inherited equally with Sunderabai under Section 15 of the Hindu Succession Act, 1956. The court examined the devolution of the widow's share upon her death. (Paras 3-4)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether Chandrabai acquired a share equal to her son Maruti under the Hindu Widows Property Rights Act (Act 1 of 1935) of erstwhile Sangli State and whether that right was perfected under Section 14(1) of the Hindu Succession Act, 1956; and whether Akkatai inherited the 1/2 share of her mother Chandrabai and inherited equally with Sunderabai under Section 15 of the Hindu Succession Act, 1956.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The judgment text is incomplete; it only sets out the grounds of objection and does not provide the final decision on the cross objections.

Law Points

  • Hindu Widows Property Rights Act (Act 1 of 1935) of erstwhile Sangli State
  • Section 14(1) Hindu Succession Act
  • 1956
  • Section 15 Hindu Succession Act
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2005 LawText (BOM) (01) 115

Cross Objections St.No.23148 of 1987 in Second Appeal No.373 of 1987

2005-01-20

A.S. Oka, J.

V.S. Gokhale for the Appellant, S.G. Deshmukh for the Respondent

Smt. Akkutai Ramu Pawar

Smt. Sundrabai Maruti Kokate

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Cross objections in a Second Appeal under the Civil Appellate Jurisdiction of the Bombay High Court.

Remedy Sought

The cross objector sought determination of whether Chandrabai acquired a share equal to her son under the Hindu Widows Property Rights Act and whether that right was perfected under Section 14(1) of the Hindu Succession Act, and whether Akkatai inherited the share of Chandrabai equally with Sunderabai under Section 15.

Filing Reason

The cross objections remained pending when the Second Appeal was decided on 5th March 1997, and were later placed for hearing.

Previous Decisions

Second Appeal No.373 of 1987 was decided by Judgment and Order dated 5th March 1997 by this Court (Coram: R.M. Lodha, J.).

Issues

Whether under the Hindu Widows Property Rights Act (Act 1 of 1935) of erstwhile Sangli State, Chandrabai acquired a share equal to her son Maruti (one-half share in the property of deceased husband Dadu) and whether that right was perfected under Section 14(1) of the Hindu Succession Act, 1956. Whether Akkatai inherited the 1/2 share of her mother Chandrabai and inherited equally with Sunderabai under Section 15 of the Hindu Succession Act, 1956.

Judgment Excerpts

The grounds of objection in the Cross Objections are as under : (1) Whether under the Hindu Widows Property Rights Act (Act 1 of 1935) of the erstwhile Sangli State, Chandrabai acquire a share equal to the share of her son Maruti (that is one-half share in the property of the deceased husband Dadu) and whether that right of hers was perfected under the provisions of Section 14 (1) of the Hindu Succession Act, 1956. (2) Whether Akkatai inherited the 1/2 share of her mother Chandrabai and inherited equally with Sunderabai under Section 15 of the Hindu Succession Act, 1956.

Procedural History

Second Appeal No.373 of 1987 was decided on 5th March 1997 by a Single Judge (R.M. Lodha, J.). The office found that Cross Objections St.No.23148 of 1987 remained pending and were not brought to the notice of the learned Single Judge. The matter was then placed before the same learned Single Judge who directed that the cross objections be placed for final hearing before the regular court. Accordingly, the cross objections were heard by Justice A.S. Oka on 20th January 2005.

Acts & Sections

  • Hindu Widows Property Rights Act (Act 1 of 1935) of erstwhile Sangli State:
  • Hindu Succession Act, 1956: Section 14(1), Section 15
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Cross Objections in Hindu Succession Act Case — Widow's Share Under Hindu Widows Property Rights Act Perfected Under Section 14(1) of Hindu Succession Act, 1956. The court considered whether a widow's limited estate under t...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Appointment of Arbitrator Despite Earlier Refusal to Extend Mandate Under Section 29A of Arbitration Act — Refusal to Extend Mandate Does Not Terminate Arbitral Proceedings or Bar Fresh Appointment Under Section 11.