Bombay High Court Allows Petition for Release of Bank Guarantee and Refund in FERA Adjudication Matter — Petitioner Entitled to Return of Security Upon Conclusion of Proceedings Under Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1973.

High Court: Bombay High Court In Favour of Accused
  • 28
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Leena N. Parekh, filed a Criminal Writ Petition seeking directions for the release of a bank guarantee executed in January 2000 and refund of sums of Rs.40,100/- and Rs.1,09,847/- from the Enforcement Directorate (Respondent No.1) and the State of Maharashtra (Respondent No.3). The background involves adjudication proceedings initiated against the petitioner under the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1973 (FERA). Dissatisfied with the delay in disposal of those proceedings, the petitioner had earlier filed Criminal Writ Petition No.377 of 1999, wherein an interim order dated 22.12.1999 was passed directing Respondent No.1 to release Rs.1,09,847/- to the petitioner subject to her furnishing a bank guarantee from a nationalised bank in favour of Respondent No.1. The petitioner executed the bank guarantee on 12.12.2000, and the amount was deposited by Respondent No.1 with Respondent No.2 (Indian Overseas Bank) to the petitioner's credit but later returned due to the bank guarantee. Subsequently, the adjudication proceedings were disposed of by the Competent Authority, and Writ Petition No.377 of 1999 was disposed of on 3.4.2000. In the adjudication, a penalty was levied on the petitioner, who appealed. The present petition was filed for release of the bank guarantee and refund of amounts. The court, after hearing the parties, held that upon completion of the adjudication proceedings, the petitioner is entitled to the return of the bank guarantee and the amount deposited as security, subject to any outstanding dues. The court directed the respondents to release the bank guarantee and refund the amounts to the petitioner.

Headnote

A) Criminal Law - Bank Guarantee - Release of Security - Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1973 - Petitioner sought release of bank guarantee executed in January 2000 and refund of Rs.40,100/- and Rs.1,09,847/- - Court held that upon completion of adjudication proceedings, the petitioner is entitled to return of the bank guarantee and the amount deposited as security, subject to any outstanding dues - Held that the bank guarantee and amount be released to the petitioner (Paras 1-5).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the petitioner is entitled to release of the bank guarantee and refund of the amount deposited pursuant to an interim order after the conclusion of adjudication proceedings under the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1973.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The court allowed the petition and directed the respondents to release the bank guarantee and refund the amounts of Rs.40,100/- and Rs.1,09,847/- to the petitioner.

Law Points

  • Bank guarantee
  • refund of amount
  • Foreign Exchange Regulation Act
  • 1973
  • adjudication proceedings
  • interim order
  • release of security
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2005 LawText (BOM) (02) 277

Criminal Writ Petition No.1738 of 2003

2005-02-28

R.M.S. Khandeparkar, P.V. Kakade

Mr. Nitin Pareikh for petitioner, Mr. D.N. Salvi for Respondent No.1, 3A, Mr. D.S. Mhaispurkar, APP for State, Ms. Rupali Bhosale i/b M/s. M.S. Bodhanwala & Co. for Respondent No.2

Leena N. Parekh

Enforcement Directorate, Indian Overseas Bank, State of Maharashtra, Union of India

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal writ petition seeking release of bank guarantee and refund of amounts deposited pursuant to interim order in FERA adjudication proceedings.

Remedy Sought

Direction for release of bank guarantee executed in January 2000 and refund of Rs.40,100/- and Rs.1,09,847/- by Respondents.

Filing Reason

Adjudication proceedings under FERA were concluded, and petitioner sought return of security furnished under interim order.

Previous Decisions

Interim order dated 22.12.1999 in Criminal Writ Petition No.377 of 1999 directing release of Rs.1,09,847/- subject to bank guarantee; Writ Petition No.377 of 1999 disposed on 3.4.2000 after adjudication proceedings concluded.

Issues

Whether the petitioner is entitled to release of bank guarantee and refund of amounts after conclusion of FERA adjudication proceedings.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued that upon completion of adjudication proceedings, the bank guarantee and amounts deposited should be released. Respondents opposed the petition, but details of their arguments are not mentioned in the judgment.

Ratio Decidendi

Upon completion of adjudication proceedings under FERA, the petitioner is entitled to the return of the bank guarantee and the amount deposited as security, subject to any outstanding dues.

Judgment Excerpts

The Petitioner by the present Petition seeks direction for release of the Bank Guarantee executed in January 2000 as well as refund of the sum of Rs.40,100/= by the Respondent Nos.1 and 3 and further release of sum of Rs.1,09,847/= in terms of interim order which was passed by this Court in Writ Petition No.377 of 1999 pursuant to which the said Bank Guarantee was executed by the Petitioner.

Procedural History

Adjudication proceedings under FERA initiated against petitioner; petitioner filed Criminal Writ Petition No.377 of 1999 due to delay; interim order dated 22.12.1999 passed directing release of Rs.1,09,847/- subject to bank guarantee; bank guarantee executed on 12.12.2000; adjudication proceedings disposed of; Writ Petition No.377 of 1999 disposed on 3.4.2000; penalty levied; appeal filed; present petition filed for release of bank guarantee and refund.

Acts & Sections

  • Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1973:
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Petition for Release of Bank Guarantee and Refund in FERA Adjudication Matter — Petitioner Entitled to Return of Security Upon Conclusion of Proceedings Under Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1973.
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Quashes Suspension of Assistant Teacher in Zilla Parishad Service — Suspension Order Based on Non-Cognizable Offences and Pending Criminal Trial Held Invalid. Court Directs Reinstatement with Continuity of Service and Stipends, Re...