Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition of Temporary Peon Challenging Termination — Appointment for One Academic Year Held to Be Temporary, No Right to Continue Beyond Stipulated Period.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY
  • 160
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Ramchandar Ramadhar Yadav, was appointed as a Peon by the respondents, Hyderabad (Sind) National Collegiate Board and Smt. Kishinibai Sitaldas Punwani Jai Hind Academy High School & Junior College, with effect from 3rd December 1992. The appointment order stated that his appointment was temporary for a period in a clear vacancy of Shri Shejwal Shivram, who had resigned, and that after expiry of the period, his services would stand terminated without any notice. The Education Officer approved the appointment for the current academic year vide order dated 19th March 1993. The petitioner's services were terminated upon expiry of the academic year. He filed an appeal before the School Tribunal, Bombay, which was dismissed on 3rd September 1993, holding that his appointment was for one academic year and he was a temporary employee. Aggrieved, the petitioner filed the present writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. The court examined the terms of the appointment order and the approval by the Education Officer. It held that the appointment was clearly temporary for a fixed term, i.e., one academic year, and the petitioner had no right to continue beyond that period. The automatic termination upon expiry of the term was valid. The court found no merit in the petition and dismissed it.

Headnote

A) Service Law - Temporary Appointment - Fixed-Term Employment - Petitioner appointed as Peon for one academic year with effect from 3rd December 1992 - Appointment order stated 'temporary for a period of in clear vacancy' and that services shall stand terminated after expiry without notice - Education Officer approved appointment for current academic year - Held that the appointment was clearly temporary for a fixed term and the petitioner had no right to continue beyond the stipulated period (Paras 2-4).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the petitioner's appointment was temporary for one academic year and whether his services could be terminated automatically upon expiry of that period without notice.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The writ petition is dismissed. No order as to costs.

Law Points

  • Temporary appointment
  • fixed-term employment
  • automatic termination
  • no right to continue
  • approval for current academic year only
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2005 LawText (BOM) (12) 76

Writ Petition No. 467 of 1994

2005-12-23

V.C. Daga, J.

Manish Mistry i/b M.M. Vashi for the petitioner; J.S. Chandani for the respondents

Ramchandar Ramadhar Yadav

Hyderabad (Sind) National Collegiate Board and Smt. Kishinibai Sitaldas Punwani Jai Hind Academy High School & Junior College

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition challenging the order of the School Tribunal dismissing the petitioner's appeal against termination of his services.

Remedy Sought

The petitioner sought to quash the Tribunal's order and to be reinstated in service.

Filing Reason

The petitioner's services were terminated upon expiry of one academic year, and he claimed that the termination was illegal.

Previous Decisions

The School Tribunal dismissed the petitioner's appeal on 3rd September 1993, holding that his appointment was temporary for one academic year.

Issues

Whether the petitioner's appointment was temporary for one academic year? Whether the termination of services upon expiry of the fixed term was valid?

Submissions/Arguments

The petitioner argued that his appointment was not temporary and that the termination was illegal. The respondents contended that the appointment was clearly temporary for one academic year and that the services automatically terminated upon expiry.

Ratio Decidendi

An appointment made for a fixed term, with a clear stipulation that services shall stand terminated upon expiry, is a temporary appointment. The employee has no right to continue beyond the stipulated period, and automatic termination is valid.

Judgment Excerpts

Your appointment is temporary for a period of in clear vacancy of Shri Shejwal Shivram who in the leave vacancy has resigned. After expiry of the above period, your services shall stand terminated without any notice. The Education Officer approved the appointment for the current academic year.

Procedural History

The petitioner was appointed on 3rd December 1992. His services were terminated after the academic year. He filed an appeal before the School Tribunal, which was dismissed on 3rd September 1993. He then filed the present writ petition in 1994.

Acts & Sections

  • Constitution of India: Article 226
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal by Returned Candidate Against High Court’s Setting Aside of Election for Corrupt Practice Under Section 123(5) of Representation of the People Act, 1951. Hiring of Cars for Conveyance of Voters Established, but Declar...
Related Judgement
High Court High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Eviction Notice Under Public Premises Act Due to Proper Procedure and Pending Statutory Appeal. Eviction Notice for Police Protection to Remove Encroachers Upheld as Non-Arbitrary and Following Public Pr...