Bombay High Court Allows Recovery of Printing Dues in Favor of Plaintiff. Defendant's Failure to File Written Statement Leads to Ex-Parte Decree with Interest at 6% p.a.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY In Favour of Prosecution
  • 149
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The plaintiff, Publicity Printers, a registered partnership firm engaged in printing business, filed a suit against the defendant, Chedda Photo Offset, for recovery of Rs.55,453/- along with future interest at 18% per annum on Rs.34,983/- from the date of suit till realization. The plaintiff's case was that the defendant entrusted printing jobs on materials supplied by the defendant, and after completing the jobs, the plaintiff forwarded invoices totaling Rs.34,983/- to the defendant. Despite a letter dated 30-4-1982 and a legal notice dated 22-10-1984, the defendant failed to pay the dues. The suit was filed in 1985. Unconditional leave to defend was granted to the defendant, but the defendant did not file a written statement. The suit proceeded ex-parte. The plaintiff's partner, Mr. Pyarali Hirjee Hamid, filed an affidavit of evidence and produced original bills. The court examined the evidence and found that the plaintiff had proved its case. The court decreed the suit in favor of the plaintiff for Rs.34,983/- with interest at 6% per annum from the date of suit till realization, and dismissed the claim for the balance amount of Rs.20,470/- and interest at 18% per annum.

Headnote

A) Civil Procedure - Recovery of Money - Suit for Recovery - Plaintiff's Entitlement - Plaintiff, a registered partnership firm, filed suit for recovery of Rs.34,983/- for printing jobs done for defendant - Defendant failed to file written statement despite unconditional leave - Court held that plaintiff proved its case through affidavit and original bills, and was entitled to decree with interest at 6% p.a. from date of suit till realization (Paras 1-5).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the plaintiff is entitled to recover the amount of Rs.34,983/- with interest from the defendant for printing jobs done.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The suit is decreed in favor of the plaintiff for Rs.34,983/- with interest at 6% per annum from the date of suit till realization. The claim for the balance amount of Rs.20,470/- and interest at 18% per annum is dismissed.

Law Points

  • Recovery of money
  • suit for recovery
  • ex-parte decree
  • interest on principal amount
  • burden of proof on plaintiff
  • failure to file written statement
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2005 LawText (BOM) (12) 73

Suit No.2269 of 1985

2005-12-01

S.R. Sathe, J.

Ms Madhvi Ravuri for Plaintiffs

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Civil suit for recovery of money

Remedy Sought

Plaintiff sought recovery of Rs.55,453/- with future interest at 18% p.a. on Rs.34,983/- from date of suit till realization.

Filing Reason

Defendant failed to pay for printing jobs done by plaintiff despite invoices, letter, and legal notice.

Previous Decisions

Unconditional leave to defend was granted to defendant, but defendant did not file written statement.

Issues

Whether the plaintiff is entitled to recover the amount of Rs.34,983/- with interest from the defendant for printing jobs done.

Submissions/Arguments

Plaintiff submitted that it carried out printing jobs as per defendant's order and sent invoices totaling Rs.34,983/-, but defendant failed to pay despite reminders and legal notice.

Ratio Decidendi

The plaintiff proved its case through affidavit of evidence and original bills, and the defendant failed to file written statement despite opportunity, thus the plaintiff is entitled to decree for the principal amount with interest at 6% p.a.

Judgment Excerpts

The plaintiff has filed this suit against the defendants for recovery of amount of Rs.55,453/- and future interest on Rs.34,983/- at the rate of 18% p.a. from the date of the suit till realisation of the amount. From the perusal of the same it is clear that the amount of Rs.34,983/- was due from the defendants.

Procedural History

Suit filed in 1985. Unconditional leave to defend granted to defendant. Defendant failed to file written statement. Suit proceeded ex-parte. Plaintiff filed affidavit of evidence and produced original bills. Judgment delivered on 1st Dec. 2005.

Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Confirms Death Sentence for Rape and Murder of Minor Tribal Girl under POCSO Act and IPC. Circumstantial evidence including DNA, last seen, and medical evidence established guilt beyond reasonable doubt.
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Appeal by Municipal Corporation Against Interim Injunction Restraining Demolition of Unauthorized Construction on MMRDA Land. The Court Held That the Trial Court Failed to Consider the Statutory Scheme Under Section 354 of th...