Bombay High Court Dismisses Husband's Divorce Appeal and Upholds Wife's Restitution of Conjugal Rights — Cruelty Not Proven, Maintenance Granted. Husband failed to prove cruelty under Section 13(1)(ia) of Hindu Marriage Act, 1955; wife entitled to restitution under Section 9.

High Court: Bombay High Court In Favour of Prosecution
  • 120
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The appellant-husband, Shri Mukund Shankar Shinde, filed two appeals against a common judgment and decree dated 31/12/2000 passed by the Family Court No. 2, Pune. The Family Court had allowed the petition filed by the respondent-wife, Sou. Shila Mukund Shinde, under Section 9 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 for restitution of conjugal rights, and dismissed the husband's petition for divorce under Section 13(1)(ia) of the same Act on the ground of cruelty. The Family Court also directed the husband to pay maintenance of Rs. 1000 per month to the wife and Rs. 750 per month to each of their two children, daughter Meenakshi and son Nikhil, from the date of the order until cohabitation is resumed. The husband appealed against this decision. The High Court, after hearing the appellant's counsel (the respondent was unrepresented), found no merit in the appeals. The court noted that the Family Court had correctly held that the wife proved that the husband had withdrawn from her society without reasonable excuse, and that the husband failed to prove cruelty. The High Court dismissed both appeals, confirming the Family Court's decree for restitution of conjugal rights and the maintenance order.

Headnote

A) Hindu Marriage Act - Restitution of Conjugal Rights - Section 9 - Burden of Proof - The wife sought restitution of conjugal rights alleging the husband withdrew from her society without reasonable excuse. The husband failed to prove any reasonable cause for separation. The Family Court allowed the wife's petition and directed the husband to resume cohabitation. Held that the wife proved her case under Section 9. (Paras 1-2)

B) Hindu Marriage Act - Divorce on Ground of Cruelty - Section 13(1)(ia) - Burden of Proof - The husband filed for divorce alleging cruelty by the wife. The Family Court found that the husband failed to prove cruelty. The High Court upheld this finding, noting that the husband's allegations were not substantiated. Held that cruelty must be proved by the petitioner. (Paras 1-2)

C) Hindu Marriage Act - Maintenance - Section 24 - Maintenance for Wife and Children - The Family Court directed the husband to pay maintenance of Rs. 1000 per month to the wife and Rs. 750 per month to each child until cohabitation is resumed. The High Court did not interfere with this order. Held that maintenance is necessary for the wife and children during separation. (Para 1)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the husband proved cruelty to obtain divorce under Section 13(1)(ia) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, and whether the wife was entitled to restitution of conjugal rights under Section 9 of the Act.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

Both appeals dismissed. The Family Court's decree for restitution of conjugal rights and maintenance order are confirmed.

Law Points

  • Restitution of conjugal rights
  • cruelty
  • burden of proof
  • maintenance pendente lite
  • Hindu Marriage Act
  • 1955
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2005 LawText (BOM) (08) 91

Family Court Appeal No. 94 of 2002 with Family Court Appeal No. 65 of 2003

2005-08-02

R.M.S. Khandeparkar, Anoop V. Mohta

Shri Madhukar Jamdar with Mr. Hemant Ghadigaonkar for the appellant. None for the respondent.

Shri Mukund Shankar Shinde

Sou. Shila Mukund Shinde

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Matrimonial dispute involving cross-petitions for restitution of conjugal rights and divorce.

Remedy Sought

The wife sought restitution of conjugal rights; the husband sought divorce on ground of cruelty.

Filing Reason

The husband withdrew from the wife's society; the wife alleged no reasonable cause; the husband alleged cruelty.

Previous Decisions

Family Court allowed wife's petition for restitution and dismissed husband's divorce petition; maintenance awarded.

Issues

Whether the husband proved cruelty under Section 13(1)(ia) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955? Whether the wife was entitled to restitution of conjugal rights under Section 9 of the Act?

Submissions/Arguments

Appellant-husband argued that the wife treated him with cruelty and that he had reasonable cause to live separately. Respondent-wife (not represented) had earlier contended that the husband withdrew without reasonable excuse.

Ratio Decidendi

The husband failed to prove cruelty as required under Section 13(1)(ia) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955. The wife proved that the husband withdrew from her society without reasonable excuse, entitling her to restitution under Section 9. Maintenance was rightly awarded.

Judgment Excerpts

The appellant-husband has preferred these two appeals against the common judgment and decree, dated 31/12/2000, passed by the learned Judge, Family Court No.2, Pune, in Petition A No. 130/1996, filed by the respondent-wife under section 9 of the Hindu Marriage Act for restitution of conjugal rights and P.A.No. 1007/1996 filed by the appellant-husband for divorce on the ground of cruelty under section 13(1)(ia) of the H.M. Act. The learned Judge held that the respondent-wife proved that the appellant-husband has without any reasonable excuse withdrawn himself from her society.

Procedural History

The wife filed Petition A No. 130/1996 under Section 9 of the Hindu Marriage Act for restitution of conjugal rights. The husband filed P.A. No. 1007/1996 under Section 13(1)(ia) for divorce on cruelty. The Family Court passed a common judgment on 31/12/2000 allowing the wife's petition and dismissing the husband's petition. The husband appealed to the High Court in Family Court Appeal No. 94 of 2002 and Family Court Appeal No. 65 of 2003. The High Court dismissed both appeals on 02/08/2005.

Acts & Sections

  • Hindu Marriage Act, 1955: 9, 13(1)(ia), 24
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Husband's Divorce Appeal and Upholds Wife's Restitution of Conjugal Rights — Cruelty Not Proven, Maintenance Granted. Husband failed to prove cruelty under Section 13(1)(ia) of Hindu Marriage Act, 1955; wife entitled to ...
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Dismisses Challenge to LPG Distributorship Allotment — Land Offered by Successful Applicant Was Separate Parcel, No Disqualification Under Guidelines. The Court upheld the allotment to the 4th respondent, finding that the land leased ...