Bombay High Court Allows Wife's Maintenance Claim Under Section 125 CrPC Despite Husband's Offer to Maintain — Husband's Conditional Offer to Keep Wife Does Not Disentitle Her to Maintenance When She Has Justifiable Reason to Live Separately. The court restored the trial court's order granting maintenance of Rs. 500 per month, holding that the wife's refusal to live with the husband was justified due to ill-treatment and harassment.

High Court: Bombay High Court In Favour of Accused
  • 128
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Sou. Surekha Sanjay Shriram, is the wife of the respondent, Sanjay Appasaheb Shriram. Their marriage was solemnized on 9th May 1997 according to Hindu Vedic rites. The petitioner filed an application under Section 125 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC) seeking monthly maintenance from her husband. The learned II Joint Civil Judge (S.D.), Sangli, allowed the application and directed the respondent to pay a monthly allowance of Rs. 500 towards maintenance. The respondent challenged this order before the Sessions Court, which set aside the order on the ground that the husband had offered to keep the wife in his house and she had refused without sufficient reason. The wife then filed the present writ petition before the Bombay High Court. The High Court examined the evidence and found that the wife had alleged ill-treatment and harassment by the husband, including demands for dowry and physical abuse. The court noted that the husband's offer to keep the wife was conditional and not genuine, as he had previously driven her out of the matrimonial home. The court held that the wife had justifiable reason to live separately and was entitled to maintenance. The court restored the trial court's order, directing the husband to pay Rs. 500 per month as maintenance. The court also clarified that the wife's right to maintenance is not defeated merely because the husband offers to maintain her in his house if she has valid grounds to refuse cohabitation.

Headnote

A) Criminal Procedure Code - Maintenance - Section 125 CrPC - Wife's Right to Separate Residence - A wife is entitled to maintenance even if the husband offers to maintain her in his house, if she has justifiable reason to live separately, such as ill-treatment, harassment, or cruelty. The court held that the wife's refusal to live with the husband was justified based on evidence of harassment. (Paras 1-10)

B) Criminal Procedure Code - Maintenance - Quantum - Section 125 CrPC - The quantum of maintenance must be determined based on the husband's income and the wife's needs. The court upheld the trial court's award of Rs. 500 per month, considering the husband's income and the wife's inability to maintain herself. (Paras 1-10)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether a wife is entitled to maintenance under Section 125 CrPC when the husband offers to keep her in his house but she refuses to live with him due to ill-treatment and harassment.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The High Court allowed the writ petition, set aside the Sessions Court's order, and restored the trial court's order directing the husband to pay Rs. 500 per month as maintenance to the wife.

Law Points

  • Section 125 CrPC
  • maintenance
  • wife's right to separate residence
  • justifiable reason to live separately
  • offer to maintain
  • quantum of maintenance
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2005 LawText (BOM) (08) 84

Writ Petition No.1752 of 2003

2005-08-19

A.S. Oka, J.

Mr. Umesh Mankapure for the Petitioner, Mr. Machindra Patil for Respondent No.1, Ms. S.D. Shinde, A.P.P. for State

Sou. Surekha Sanjay Shriram

Sanjay Appasaheb Shriram, State of Maharashtra

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition challenging the Sessions Court's order setting aside maintenance granted under Section 125 CrPC.

Remedy Sought

The petitioner (wife) sought restoration of the trial court's order granting monthly maintenance of Rs. 500.

Filing Reason

The Sessions Court set aside the maintenance order on the ground that the husband offered to keep the wife, and she refused without sufficient reason.

Previous Decisions

The II Joint Civil Judge (S.D.), Sangli allowed the wife's application under Section 125 CrPC and directed the husband to pay Rs. 500 per month. The Sessions Court reversed that order.

Issues

Whether the wife is entitled to maintenance under Section 125 CrPC when the husband offers to keep her in his house but she refuses due to ill-treatment. What is the proper quantum of maintenance in such circumstances?

Submissions/Arguments

The petitioner argued that she was subjected to ill-treatment and harassment by the husband, and she had justifiable reason to live separately. The respondent argued that he was willing to keep the wife in his house and she refused without any valid reason, thus she was not entitled to maintenance.

Ratio Decidendi

A wife is entitled to maintenance under Section 125 CrPC even if the husband offers to maintain her in his house, if she has justifiable reason to live separately, such as ill-treatment, harassment, or cruelty. The offer to keep the wife must be genuine and unconditional; a conditional offer or one made after driving her out does not disentitle her to maintenance.

Judgment Excerpts

The Petitioner is the wife of the Respondent No.1. The learned II Joint Civil Judge (S.D.), Sangli allowed the said application and directed the Respondent No.1 to pay monthly allowance towards maintenance. The Sessions Court set aside the order on the ground that the husband had offered to keep the wife in his house and she had refused without sufficient reason. The court held that the wife had justifiable reason to live separately and was entitled to maintenance.

Procedural History

The wife filed an application under Section 125 CrPC before the II Joint Civil Judge (S.D.), Sangli, which was allowed. The husband appealed to the Sessions Court, which set aside the order. The wife then filed the present writ petition before the Bombay High Court.

Acts & Sections

  • Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973: 125
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Wife's Maintenance Claim Under Section 125 CrPC Despite Husband's Offer to Maintain — Husband's Conditional Offer to Keep Wife Does Not Disentitle Her to Maintenance When She Has Justifiable Reason to Live Separately. The c...
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Employee's Compensation Act Case — Modifies Interest Rate to 12% Per Annum from Date of Accident. Statutory Mandate Under Section 4A(3)(a) of Employee's Compensation Act, 1923 Requires 12% Simple Interest on Default, ...