Bombay High Court Grants Bail to Accused No.4 in Criminal Case Due to Lack of Prima Facie Evidence of Conspiracy. Applicant Enlarged on Bail of Rs.50,000 with Surety.

High Court: Bombay High Court In Favour of Accused
  • 122
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The applicant, Shreyas Prabhakar Rajapurkar, accused No.4, filed an application for bail in the High Court of Judicature at Bombay. The application was heard by Justice A.S. Oka. The applicant was represented by Mr. A.S. Khan & Associates with Mr. J.P. Shah and Mr. Manish Bohra, while the State was represented by Ms. Rajeshree Gadhvi, A.P.P. The learned Sessions Judge, Mumbai had previously allowed the bail application, but the applicant approached the High Court for confirmation or modification. The court considered the submissions and found that there was no prima facie evidence of conspiracy under Section 120B IPC against the applicant. Consequently, the court ordered that the applicant be enlarged on bail on a bond of Rs.50,000 with one surety. The judgment was pronounced on August 17, 2005.

Headnote

A) Criminal Law - Bail - Prima Facie Case - Section 120B, 420 IPC - Applicant accused No.4 sought bail in a case of cheating and conspiracy - Court held that there was no prima facie evidence of conspiracy against the applicant, and therefore, he was entitled to bail - Held that the applicant be enlarged on bail on a bond of Rs.50,000 with one surety (Paras 1-2).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the applicant, accused No.4, is entitled to bail in the absence of prima facie evidence of conspiracy under Section 120B IPC.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The application is allowed. The applicant is ordered to be enlarged on bail on a bond of Rs.50,000 with one surety.

Law Points

  • Bail
  • Prima Facie Case
  • Conspiracy
  • Section 120B IPC
  • Section 420 IPC
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2005 LawText (BOM) (08) 63

Criminal Application No.4672 of 2005

2005-08-17

A.S. Oka

Mr. A.S. Khan & Associates with Mr. J.P. Shah and Mr. Manish Bohra for Applicant, Ms. Rajeshree Gadhvi, A.P.P. for State

Shreyas Prabhakar Rajapurkar

The State of Maharashtra

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal bail application

Remedy Sought

Grant of bail by the applicant, accused No.4

Filing Reason

Applicant sought bail in a case involving allegations of cheating and conspiracy

Previous Decisions

Learned Sessions Judge, Mumbai allowed the bail application

Issues

Whether the applicant is entitled to bail in the absence of prima facie evidence of conspiracy under Section 120B IPC.

Submissions/Arguments

Applicant argued that there is no prima facie evidence of conspiracy against him. State opposed the bail application.

Ratio Decidendi

In the absence of prima facie evidence of conspiracy under Section 120B IPC, the accused is entitled to bail.

Judgment Excerpts

Heard Advocate for the Applicant and the learned A.P.P. for State. An application made by the Applicant for grant of bail has been allowed by the learned Sessions Judge, Mumbai.

Procedural History

The applicant filed a bail application before the learned Sessions Judge, Mumbai, which was allowed. The applicant then approached the High Court for confirmation or modification of the bail order.

Acts & Sections

  • Indian Penal Code, 1860: 120B, 420
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Upholds Legal Representative's Right to Continue Criminal Revision in Cheating Conviction Despite Death of Convict. High Court's Order Limiting Revisional Jurisdiction to Sentence of Fine Set Aside as Section 431 of Code of Criminal Pro...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Grants Leave to Defend in Summary Suit for Recovery of Price of Goods — Triable Issues Raised Regarding Authority to Sue, Limitation, and Replacement Goods. The court held that the defendant's defences raised triable issues under ...