Bombay High Court Allows SICOM's Petition Against Guarantors Under Section 31(1)(aa) of SFC Act for Recovery of Loan Default. Guarantors Held Liable Under Unconditional Guarantee Deed for Repayment of Term Loan.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY In Favour of Prosecution
  • 91
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, SICOM Limited, a deemed State Financial Corporation under Section 46 of the State Financial Corporation Act, 1951, filed a petition under Section 31(1)(aa) of the Act against respondent nos. 2 and 3, who were guarantors for a term loan of Rs. 320 lacs sanctioned to respondent no.1 company. The loan was sanctioned by letter dated 10.2.1990 and availed by respondent no.1, with its assets mortgaged under a deed dated 13.8.1998. Respondent nos. 2 and 3 executed an unconditional deed of guarantee dated 14.8.1998 guaranteeing repayment in case of default. The petitioner disbursed the loan in instalments, but respondent no.1 committed defaults in repayment. Consequently, the petitioner sought recovery from the guarantors under Section 31(1)(aa). The Court, after considering the facts, allowed the petition, holding that the guarantors are liable to repay the loan amount as per the unconditional guarantee. The decision was in favor of the petitioner (the financial corporation).

Headnote

A) State Financial Corporation Act, 1951 - Section 31(1)(aa) - Recovery against guarantors - The petitioner, a deemed State Financial Corporation, sanctioned a term loan of Rs. 320 lacs to respondent no.1, which was guaranteed by respondent nos. 2 and 3 under an unconditional deed of guarantee. Upon default by the principal borrower, the Corporation filed a petition under Section 31(1)(aa) against the guarantors. The Court held that the guarantors are liable to repay the loan amount as per the terms of the guarantee, and the Corporation is entitled to recover the same under the said provision. (Paras 1-4)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the petitioner, a deemed State Financial Corporation, is entitled to recover the loan amount from the guarantors under Section 31(1)(aa) of the State Financial Corporation Act, 1951, when the principal borrower has defaulted.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The petition is allowed. The guarantors (respondent nos. 2 and 3) are liable to repay the loan amount as per the deed of guarantee.

Law Points

  • Liability of guarantors under unconditional guarantee
  • State Financial Corporation's power to proceed against guarantors under Section 31(1)(aa) of SFC Act
  • 1951
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2005 LawText (BOM) (04) 156

MISC. PETITION NO. 11 OF 2002

2005-04-13

S.U. Kamdar, J.

Mr. F. E. D’Vetre with Mr. P.N. Mody with T.N. Tripathi for Respondents; Mr. Kevia Setalwad with Mr. P.V. Shah for petitioners

SICOM Limited

Co-Nick Alloys (India) Limited & Ors.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Petition under Section 31(1)(aa) of the State Financial Corporation Act, 1951 for recovery of loan amount from guarantors.

Remedy Sought

Petitioner sought recovery of the loan amount from respondent nos. 2 and 3 as guarantors.

Filing Reason

Default in repayment of term loan by the principal borrower (respondent no.1).

Issues

Whether the guarantors are liable to repay the loan amount under the deed of guarantee? Whether the petitioner is entitled to recover the amount under Section 31(1)(aa) of the SFC Act?

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued that the guarantee was unconditional and the guarantors are liable upon default. Respondents' arguments not mentioned in the provided text.

Ratio Decidendi

Under Section 31(1)(aa) of the State Financial Corporation Act, 1951, a Financial Corporation can proceed against guarantors for recovery of loan amounts when the principal borrower defaults, especially when the guarantee is unconditional.

Judgment Excerpts

The said deed of guarantee is unconditional and without any demur. Relying upon the aforesaid representation of the respondent nos. 2 and 3, the petitioner disbursed the said sum of Rs. 320 lacs to the respondent no. 1 in various instalments from time to time.

Procedural History

The petition was filed under Section 31(1)(aa) of the State Financial Corporation Act, 1951 against the guarantors after the principal borrower defaulted on repayment of a term loan sanctioned in 1990.

Acts & Sections

  • State Financial Corporation Act, 1951: 31(1)(aa), 46
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Appeal by State Financial Corporation Against Injunction Restraining Possession Under Section 29 of SFC Act. Statutory Right to Take Possession Cannot Be Injuncted Without Proof of Arbitrariness.
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Financial Institution's Petition Under Section 31(1)(aa) of SFC Act for Enforcement of Mortgage Against Guarantors. The court held that the petition is maintainable against guarantors and not barred by limitation under Articl...