Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Murder and Cruelty by Husband — Life Imprisonment Confirmed for Axe Murder of Wife for Refusing Money for Liquor. The court relied on eyewitness testimony and seizure of the axe to affirm the conviction under Sections 302 and 498A of the Indian Penal Code, 1860.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY In Favour of Prosecution
  • 95
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The appellant, Walkesh Gangaram Jhadav, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Thane in Sessions Case No.405 of 1998 for the murder of his wife Hirabai under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) and for cruelty under Section 498A IPC. He was sentenced to life imprisonment for murder and two years rigorous imprisonment for cruelty, with fines. The incident occurred in the house of the complainant (PW1), who is the father of the deceased. The prosecution case was that the appellant axed his wife to death because she refused to provide him money for liquor. The complainant's daughter Kavita (PW3) saw the appellant going towards Hirabai with an axe and called out to her father. The complainant rushed to the room and saw the appellant had already dealt a blow on Hirabai's neck with the axe. The appellant then ran away. The complainant lodged a complaint at Padgha Police Station. The axe was seized from the complainant's house where the accused had thrown it. The appellant was apprehended and tried. The trial court convicted him. The appellant appealed to the Bombay High Court. The High Court, after hearing the arguments, found the evidence of the eyewitnesses credible and consistent. The court noted that the appellant had thrown the axe in the complainant's house, which was seized. The court upheld the conviction under Section 302 IPC and Section 498A IPC, and confirmed the sentences, ordering them to run concurrently. The appeal was dismissed.

Headnote

A) Criminal Law - Murder - Section 302 IPC - Conviction based on eyewitness testimony - The appellant was convicted for murdering his wife by axing her neck after she refused to give him money for liquor. The court upheld the conviction relying on the testimony of the complainant (father of deceased) and the eyewitness (sister of deceased), which was consistent and credible. (Paras 2-3)

B) Criminal Law - Cruelty by Husband - Section 498A IPC - Conviction for cruelty - The appellant was also convicted under Section 498A for subjecting his wife to cruelty. The court upheld this conviction as the evidence showed the appellant demanded money for liquor and assaulted his wife when she refused. (Para 2)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the conviction of the appellant under Sections 302 and 498A of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 is sustainable on the basis of the evidence on record.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The appeal is dismissed. The conviction and sentences under Sections 302 and 498A IPC are confirmed. The substantive sentences shall run concurrently.

Law Points

  • Murder
  • Cruelty
  • Section 302 IPC
  • Section 498A IPC
  • Life Imprisonment
  • Concurrent Sentences
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2005 LawText (BOM) (04) 63

Criminal Appeal No.141 of 2001

2005-04-25

V.G. Palshikar, Smt. Nishita Mhatre

Mr. S.N. Bhonsale (for Appellant), Mrs. P.H. Kantharia (for Respondent)

Walkesh Gangaram Jhadav

The State of Maharashtra

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal appeal against conviction for murder and cruelty

Remedy Sought

Appellant sought acquittal from the conviction under Sections 302 and 498A IPC

Filing Reason

Appellant was convicted for murdering his wife by axing her neck after she refused to give him money for liquor

Previous Decisions

Trial court convicted appellant under Sections 302 and 498A IPC and sentenced to life imprisonment and two years rigorous imprisonment respectively

Issues

Whether the conviction under Section 302 IPC is sustainable based on the evidence of eyewitnesses Whether the conviction under Section 498A IPC is sustainable

Submissions/Arguments

Not mentioned in the provided text

Ratio Decidendi

The conviction for murder under Section 302 IPC is sustainable based on the credible and consistent testimony of eyewitnesses (PW1 and PW3) and the seizure of the axe from the scene. The conviction for cruelty under Section 498A IPC is also upheld as the evidence shows the appellant demanded money for liquor and assaulted his wife.

Judgment Excerpts

The Complainant, who is PW1, is the father of the deceased Hirabai. The case of the prosecution is based on his complaint that his daughter Hirabai was axed to death by her husband since she refused to provide him money for liquor. Kavita, therefore, called out to the Complainant, PW1. He rushed to the room where Hirabai was. The Appellant had already dealt a blow on Hirabai’s neck with the axe.

Procedural History

The appellant was tried by the Sessions Court, Thane in Sessions Case No.405 of 1998 and convicted on 8th December 2000. He appealed to the Bombay High Court in Criminal Appeal No.141 of 2001, which was dismissed on 25th April 2005.

Acts & Sections

  • Indian Penal Code, 1860: 302, 498A
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Seniority Dispute – Kerala Water Authority – Special Rules 1960 – Subordinate Service Rules 1966 – Promotion Quotas – Degree vs. Diploma Quota – Applicability of Rule 4(b) – Supreme Court Overturns High Court Ruling. Promotion and Seni...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Petitions Challenging Chancellor's Order in Goa University Service Dispute. Appointment of Lower Division Clerk Set Aside as Not Conforming to Goa University Act, 1984.