Bombay High Court Quashes Section 307 IPC in Land Dispute Case — No Intent to Kill Found. Magistrate's Order to Issue Process Under Section 307 IPC Set Aside as Allegations of Strangulation Were Not Supported by Investigation and No Intention to Cause Death Was Evident.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: AURANGABAD In Favour of Accused
  • 99
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioners, original accused in a criminal case, filed an application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC) challenging the order of the Judicial Magistrate First Class, Shirur Kasar, District Beed dated 20/5/2017, which directed issuance of process under Section 307 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) along with other sections. The case arose from an FIR lodged on 24/8/2015 alleging that due to a land dispute, the accused formed an unlawful assembly, assaulted the complainant, and that applicant no.5 tried to throttle the complainant's wife with a saree and snatched her gold mangalsutra. Initially, the crime was registered under Sections 143, 147, 148, 149, 394, 326, 504 IPC and Section 25 read with Section 4 of the Arms Act. During investigation, the Investigating Officer deleted Section 394 IPC and added Section 327 IPC, and submitted a charge sheet on 13/12/2016 without including Section 307 IPC. However, the summary mentioned the strangulation attempt. Later, the Investigating Officer submitted a report dated 24/3/2017 to the Magistrate requesting deletion of the strangulation version, stating that the offence was committed only to take possession of land and there was no intention to kill. The Magistrate, by the impugned order, held that the record showed consistent allegations of throttling and that there was sufficient ground to proceed under Section 307 IPC, rejecting the Investigating Officer's report. The High Court examined the materials and found that the allegations, even if true, did not disclose an intention to cause death or knowledge that the act was likely to cause death, as required for Section 307 IPC. The court noted that the Investigating Officer had specifically opined that there was no intention to kill, and the Magistrate had not given adequate reasons to override that opinion. The High Court held that the order issuing process under Section 307 IPC was not sustainable and quashed it, while allowing the proceedings to continue for other offences. The court allowed the application in part, setting aside the impugned order only to the extent of Section 307 IPC.

Headnote

A) Criminal Procedure Code - Section 482 - Inherent Powers - Quashing of Process - The High Court can exercise inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC to quash an order issuing process if the allegations do not prima facie constitute the offence alleged. (Paras 1-2)

B) Indian Penal Code - Section 307 - Attempt to Murder - Ingredients - For an offence under Section 307 IPC, there must be an intention to cause death or knowledge that the act is likely to cause death. Mere allegation of strangulation without evidence of intention to kill does not attract Section 307. (Paras 6-8)

C) Criminal Procedure Code - Section 190 - Cognizance of Offence - Magistrate's Power - While taking cognizance, the Magistrate can consider the charge sheet and other materials, but cannot add a more serious offence without proper basis. The Investigating Officer's report seeking deletion of the strangulation allegation was a relevant factor. (Paras 4-5)

D) Criminal Procedure Code - Section 173 - Charge Sheet - Contents - The Investigating Officer has the discretion to include or exclude sections based on investigation. The Magistrate cannot substitute his own opinion over the investigating officer's findings without strong reasons. (Paras 3-5)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the learned Magistrate was justified in directing issuance of process under Section 307 of the IPC despite the Investigating Officer having not included that section in the charge sheet and having submitted a report seeking deletion of the allegation of strangulation.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The High Court allowed the application in part. The impugned order dated 20/5/2017 passed by the Judicial Magistrate First Class, Shirur Kasar, District Beed is set aside only to the extent of issuance of process under Section 307 of the IPC. The proceedings shall continue for other offences.

Law Points

  • Section 482 CrPC
  • Section 307 IPC
  • Cognizance of offence
  • Charge sheet
  • Magistrate's power to add sections
  • Intent to kill
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2019 LawText (BOM) (10) 25

Criminal Application No. 4456 of 2017

2019-10-16

Mangesh S. Patil

Mr. N.V. Gaware for the applicants, Mr. B.V. Virdhe, APP for respondent State

Ashok Maroti Garkal, Kakasaheb Maroti Garkal, Jalindar Ashok Garkal, Maroti Asraji Garkal, Manubai @ Manisha Ashok Garkal

The State of Maharashtra

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal application under Section 482 CrPC challenging the order of Magistrate issuing process under Section 307 IPC.

Remedy Sought

Quashing of the order dated 20/5/2017 passed by the Judicial Magistrate First Class, Shirur Kasar, District Beed directing issuance of process under Section 307 IPC.

Filing Reason

The applicants (original accused) challenged the Magistrate's order adding Section 307 IPC despite the Investigating Officer not including it in the charge sheet and later seeking deletion of the strangulation allegation.

Previous Decisions

The Magistrate had passed the impugned order on 20/5/2017 directing process under Section 307 IPC. The Investigating Officer had submitted a charge sheet on 13/12/2016 without Section 307 IPC, and later a report on 24/3/2017 seeking deletion of the strangulation version.

Issues

Whether the Magistrate was justified in issuing process under Section 307 IPC when the Investigating Officer had not included that section in the charge sheet and had submitted a report stating no intention to kill. Whether the allegations in the FIR and charge sheet prima facie constitute an offence under Section 307 IPC.

Submissions/Arguments

The applicants argued that the Investigating Officer had specifically opined that there was no intention to kill and had sought deletion of the strangulation allegation, and the Magistrate erred in adding Section 307 IPC without proper basis. The State supported the Magistrate's order, contending that the allegations of strangulation with a saree prima facie attract Section 307 IPC.

Ratio Decidendi

For an offence under Section 307 IPC, there must be an intention to cause death or knowledge that the act is likely to cause death. Mere allegation of strangulation without evidence of such intention or knowledge does not attract Section 307. The Investigating Officer's opinion that there was no intention to kill is a relevant factor, and the Magistrate cannot override it without strong reasons.

Judgment Excerpts

The Investigating Officer had specifically mentioned about the applicant no.5 having tried to strangulate wife of the complainant with a saree. The learned Magistrate refuted the report submitted by the Investigating Officer on the ground that there was sufficient ground to proceed against the applicants even for the offence punishable under Section 307 of the I.P.C. The allegations, even if taken at their face value, do not disclose any intention to cause death or knowledge that the act is likely to cause death.

Procedural History

FIR lodged on 24/8/2015. Charge sheet submitted on 13/12/2016 without Section 307 IPC. Investigating Officer submitted report on 24/3/2017 seeking deletion of strangulation allegation. Magistrate passed order on 20/5/2017 issuing process under Section 307 IPC. Applicants filed Criminal Application No. 4456 of 2017 under Section 482 CrPC. High Court reserved judgment on 3/9/2019 and pronounced on 16/10/2019.

Acts & Sections

  • Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973: 482, 190, 173
  • Indian Penal Code, 1860: 307, 143, 147, 148, 149, 394, 326, 504, 327
  • Arms Act, 1959: 25, 4
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Quashes Section 307 IPC in Land Dispute Case — No Intent to Kill Found. Magistrate's Order to Issue Process Under Section 307 IPC Set Aside as Allegations of Strangulation Were Not Supported by Investigation and No Intention to Ca...
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Karnataka Grants Anticipatory Bail to Accused in Attempt to Murder Case — Injury on Shoulder Not Indicative of Intent to Kill. Petitioner Allegedly Assaulted Complainant with Chopper but Injury Was on Shoulder, Not Neck, Leading to Gr...