Bombay High Court Grants Decree on Admissions Under Order XII Rule 6 CPC in Property Conveyance Suit. Court directs defendant society to execute deed of conveyance and power of attorney and hand over possession of suit property based on clear admissions in written statement.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY In Favour of Prosecution
  • 105
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The plaintiff, Nitin Chandrakant Patel, a senior citizen and sole proprietor of M/s. Mahalaxmi Land Development, filed a suit against Pariwar Co-operative Housing Society Ltd. and its office bearers (defendants) seeking a decree for execution of a deed of conveyance and power of attorney and for possession of a land admeasuring 5,412 sq.mtrs. bearing CTS No.1196-E at Village Kanjur, Taluka Kurla, Mumbai Suburban District. The plaintiff claimed that the defendants had agreed to sell the suit property to him and had received full consideration, but failed to execute the conveyance. The plaintiff filed an application under Order XII Rule 6 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) for a decree on admissions, relying on admissions made by the defendants in their written statement. The defendants admitted the agreement and receipt of consideration but raised certain defenses. The court examined the provisions of Order XII Rule 6 CPC, which allows the court to pass a judgment on admissions at any stage of the suit. The court found that the admissions in the written statement were clear, unambiguous, and unequivocal, and that the defendants had not raised any triable issues that would require a trial. Consequently, the court allowed the application and passed a decree directing the defendants to execute the deed of conveyance and power of attorney and hand over possession of the suit property to the plaintiff. The court also ordered the defendants to pay costs of the application.

Headnote

A) Civil Procedure - Judgment on Admissions - Order XII Rule 6 CPC - Decree on Admissions - The court may pass a decree on admissions if the admissions are clear, unambiguous, and unequivocal. The admissions must be of such a nature that they entitle the plaintiff to the relief sought without requiring a trial. (Paras 2-4)

B) Property Law - Conveyance of Property - Specific Performance - Suit for Execution of Deed of Conveyance - The plaintiff sought a decree directing the defendants to execute a deed of conveyance and power of attorney and hand over possession of the suit property. The defendants admitted the agreement and receipt of consideration in their written statement, leading to the court granting the decree. (Paras 1, 5-6)

C) Civil Procedure - Admissions in Pleading - Effect of Admissions - Admissions made in the written statement are binding on the defendants and can be used to pass a decree under Order XII Rule 6 CPC. The court held that the admissions were sufficient to grant the relief without further trial. (Paras 5-6)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the plaintiff is entitled to a decree under Order XII Rule 6 CPC based on admissions made by the defendants in their written statement.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The court allowed the application under Order XII Rule 6 CPC and passed a decree directing defendant nos.1 to 3 to execute the deed of conveyance and power of attorney with respect to the suit property and to hand over possession of the suit property to the plaintiff. The defendants were also directed to pay costs of the application.

Law Points

  • Order XII Rule 6 CPC
  • judgment on admissions
  • decree on admissions
  • admission in pleading
  • admission in written statement
  • conveyance of property
  • specific performance
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2025 LawText (BOM) (10) 83

Interim Application No.3644 of 2022 in Suit No.273 of 2021

2025-10-17

Jitendra Jain, J.

Mr. Rohaan Cama a/w Ms. Ayushi Anandpara, Mr. Gaurav Gopal and Mr. Mohit Goyal i/by Wadia Ghandy & Co. for the Applicant/Plaintiff. Mr. Vatsal Shah i/by Mr. Abhishek Patil for the Defendants.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Civil suit for specific performance seeking execution of deed of conveyance and power of attorney and possession of property.

Remedy Sought

Plaintiff sought a decree directing defendants to execute deed of conveyance and power of attorney and hand over possession of suit property.

Filing Reason

Defendants failed to execute conveyance despite receiving full consideration under an agreement.

Issues

Whether the plaintiff is entitled to a decree under Order XII Rule 6 CPC based on admissions made by the defendants in their written statement.

Submissions/Arguments

Plaintiff argued that defendants admitted the agreement and receipt of consideration in their written statement, entitling plaintiff to decree on admissions. Defendants opposed the application, raising defenses that required trial.

Ratio Decidendi

Under Order XII Rule 6 CPC, if admissions of fact are made in pleadings or otherwise, the court may at any stage pass a judgment or decree without waiting for determination of other questions. The admissions must be clear, unambiguous, and unequivocal. In this case, the defendants' written statement contained clear admissions of the agreement and receipt of consideration, entitling the plaintiff to the decree sought.

Judgment Excerpts

The plaintiff has made an application under Order XII Rule 6 of the Civil Procedure Code, 1908 (CPC) for passing a decree in its favour and against defendant nos.1 to 3 with a direction to these defendants to execute the deed of conveyance and power of attorney with respect to land admeasuring 5,412 sq.mtrs. bearing CTS No.1196-E Village Kanjur, Taluka Kurla, Mumbai Suburban District and to handover possession of the said suit property to the plaintiff. Order XII Rule 6(1) of the CPC deals with judgment on admissions. It provides that where admissions of fact have been made either in the pleading or otherwise, the Court may at any stage of the suit and without waiting for the determination of any other question between the parties, make such order or give such judgment as it may think fit, having regard to such admissions.

Procedural History

The plaintiff filed Suit No.273 of 2021 seeking specific performance. Subsequently, the plaintiff filed Interim Application No.3644 of 2022 under Order XII Rule 6 CPC for a decree on admissions. The application was heard and disposed of by this judgment.

Acts & Sections

  • Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC): Order XII Rule 6
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Grants Decree on Admissions Under Order XII Rule 6 CPC in Property Conveyance Suit. Court directs defendant society to execute deed of conveyance and power of attorney and hand over possession of suit property based on clear admissi...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Specific Performance of Sale Agreement in Cross Appeals — Upholds Trial Court Decree for Execution of Sale Deed. Agreement to Sell for Rs. 17,000 with Rs. 13,275 Earnest Money and Possession Delivered; Defendant's Refusal t...