Bombay High Court Partly Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Reduces Contributory Negligence from 30% to 15%. Deceased Motorcyclist Found Partly Negligent for Not Wearing Helmet and Not Having Valid Driving Licence, Leading to Reduction in Deduction from Compensation.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: AURANGABAD
  • 66
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The present appeal was filed by the original claimants, being the widow, children, and father of the deceased Hanmantrao Manikrao Deshmukh, challenging the findings of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Latur, in M.A.C.P. No.256/2013 dated 23.03.2017. The Tribunal had held the deceased negligent to the extent of 30% and deducted that amount from the total compensation. The claimants sought enhancement of compensation and deletion of the finding of contributory negligence. The accident occurred on 16.09.2013 when the deceased was driving a motorcycle bearing No.MH 24/X3631 on Latur-Chakur road. A Tata Pick up vehicle bearing No.MH 26/AD6283, driven by respondent No.1, came from the opposite direction in a rash and negligent manner and dashed against the motorcycle, causing the death of the deceased on the spot. The claimants filed a petition under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, claiming compensation of Rs.90,96,700/-. The Tribunal awarded total compensation of Rs.22,80,000/- but deducted 30% for contributory negligence of the deceased, arriving at a net amount of Rs.15,96,000/-. The High Court, after considering the evidence, found that the deceased was not wearing a helmet and did not possess a valid driving licence. The court held that the deceased contributed to the accident to the extent of 15% and reduced the deduction accordingly. The court also upheld the multiplier of 15 and the income of Rs.15,000/- per month as assessed by the Tribunal. The appeal was partly allowed, modifying the award to reflect a 15% deduction instead of 30%.

Headnote

A) Motor Vehicles Act - Contributory Negligence - Apportionment of Liability - Section 166 Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - The deceased motorcyclist was driving without a valid driving licence and without wearing a helmet, and the accident occurred on a straight road where both vehicles were on their correct side - The High Court held that the deceased contributed to the accident to the extent of 15% and reduced the deduction from 30% to 15% (Paras 10-12).

B) Motor Vehicles Act - Compensation - Deduction for Contributory Negligence - Section 166 Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - The Tribunal had deducted 30% from the total compensation on account of contributory negligence of the deceased - The High Court, after re-appreciating evidence, found that the deceased was negligent to the extent of 15% and modified the award accordingly (Paras 10-12).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the Tribunal was correct in holding the deceased motorcyclist contributorily negligent to the extent of 30% and whether the compensation awarded is just and proper.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The appeal is partly allowed. The finding of contributory negligence against the deceased is reduced from 30% to 15%. The award is modified accordingly. The respondent No.3 Insurance Company is directed to pay the modified compensation amount with interest at 7.5% per annum from the date of petition till realization. The amount already paid shall be deducted.

Law Points

  • Contributory negligence
  • Motor accident compensation
  • Deduction for contributory negligence
  • Standard of proof for negligence
  • Apportionment of liability
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2019 LawText (BOM) (08) 3

First Appeal No.585 of 2019

2019-08-01

Smt. Vibha Kankanwadi, J.

Mr. R.B. Deshpande for the appellants, Mr. G.R. Syed for respondent Nos.1 and 2, Mr. V.N. Upadhye for respondent No.3

Ujwala w/o Hanmantrao Deshmukh, Kallyani d/o Hanmantrao Deshmukh, Rohan Hanmantrao Deshmukh, Manikrao Balasaheb Deshmukh

Shivshankar Ananda Londhe, Dharoji Gunjaji Hambarde, I.C.I.C.I. Lombard General Insurance Company Ltd.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Appeal against award of Motor Accident Claims Tribunal in a claim petition under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

Remedy Sought

The appellants (original claimants) sought enhancement of compensation and deletion of the finding of contributory negligence against the deceased.

Filing Reason

The claimants were aggrieved by the Tribunal's finding that the deceased was contributorily negligent to the extent of 30% and the consequent deduction from the compensation amount.

Previous Decisions

The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Latur, in M.A.C.P. No.256/2013 dated 23.03.2017, awarded total compensation of Rs.22,80,000/- but deducted 30% for contributory negligence, resulting in a net award of Rs.15,96,000/-.

Issues

Whether the Tribunal was correct in holding the deceased contributorily negligent to the extent of 30%. Whether the compensation awarded is just and proper.

Submissions/Arguments

Appellants argued that the accident was solely due to the negligence of the driver of the Tata Pick up vehicle and that the deceased was not negligent. Respondent No.3 (Insurance Company) supported the Tribunal's finding of contributory negligence, pointing out that the deceased did not have a valid driving licence and was not wearing a helmet.

Ratio Decidendi

The deceased motorcyclist, by not wearing a helmet and not possessing a valid driving licence, contributed to the accident to the extent of 15%. The Tribunal's deduction of 30% was excessive and reduced to 15%.

Judgment Excerpts

Present appeal has been filed by the original claimants challenging findings by learned Member, Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Latur in M.A.C.P. No.256/2013 dated 23.03.2017, thereby holding the deceased negligent to the extent of 30% and then deducting amount from the total compensation amount. The deceased was not having valid driving licence and was not wearing helmet. Therefore, he contributed to the accident to the extent of 15%.

Procedural History

The original claimants filed M.A.C.P. No.256/2013 before the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Latur, which was decided on 23.03.2017. The Tribunal awarded compensation but deducted 30% for contributory negligence. Aggrieved, the claimants filed the present First Appeal No.585 of 2019 before the Bombay High Court, Bench at Aurangabad. The appeal was reserved on 02.07.2019 and pronounced on 01.08.2019.

Acts & Sections

  • Motor Vehicles Act, 1988: Section 166
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Adverse Possession Case — Appellant Failed to Prove Hostile Possession for Statutory Period. The Court held that mere long possession without animus possidendi does not constitute adverse possession unde...
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Karnataka Quashes Criminal Proceedings in Illegal Sand Mining Case Due to Lack of Sanction Under Section 22 of Mines and Minerals Act. Proceedings under Section 379 IPC and other allied offences held not maintainable without prior sanct...