Bombay High Court Quashes Chargesheet in Abetment of Suicide Case Due to Absence of Instigation. Alleged Teasing and Abusing Eight Months Prior to Suicide Does Not Constitute Abetment Under Section 306 IPC.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: NAGPUR In Favour of Accused
  • 79
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The applicant, Ashish Buddhabharat Nandeshwar, filed a criminal application under Section 482 CrPC seeking quashing of the chargesheet filed against him for the offence under Section 306 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code, arising from FIR No.145 of 2018 registered at Police Station Sakoli, District Bhandara. The deceased, Rashmi Sakhare, aged 24, was residing with her aunt after losing her mother. She was in love with Amit Vaidya, a student from the same study circle, who left Sakoli for studies in Aurangabad, causing her mental distress. On 25.8.2018, after a quarrel with her aunt, she poured kerosene on herself and set herself on fire, sustaining 80% burns, and succumbed on 26.4.2018. The dying declaration recorded in the hospital alleged that the applicant had abused and teased her in December 2017 when she did not attend his study circle. The applicant argued that this remote incident, eight months prior to the suicide, could not constitute abetment. The court examined the dying declaration and found no evidence of instigation or active involvement by the applicant. The court held that the alleged acts were too remote and did not meet the threshold for abetment under Section 306 IPC, as the suicide was triggered by the deceased's personal issues. Consequently, the court quashed the chargesheet and allowed the application.

Headnote

A) Criminal Law - Abetment of Suicide - Section 306 Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Quashing of Chargesheet - The court considered whether the dying declaration alleging that the applicant abused and teased the deceased in December 2017, eight months prior to her suicide on 25.8.2018, constituted abetment. Held that the alleged acts were too remote and did not amount to instigation or active abetment, as the deceased's suicide was triggered by a quarrel with her aunt and her lover's departure. The chargesheet was quashed. (Paras 2-6)

B) Criminal Procedure - Quashing of FIR - Inherent Powers under Section 482 Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 - The court exercised inherent powers to quash the chargesheet where no prima facie case under Section 306 IPC was made out, as the dying declaration lacked proximity and mens rea for abetment. (Paras 1-6)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the allegations in the dying declaration and chargesheet constitute an offence under Section 306 IPC against the applicant.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The court allowed the application and quashed the chargesheet filed against the applicant for the offence under Section 306 r/w 34 IPC.

Law Points

  • Abetment of suicide requires active instigation or direct involvement
  • mere harassment or teasing without proximity to suicide not sufficient
  • Dying declaration must show clear mens rea for abetment
  • Section 306 IPC not attracted by remote acts
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2019 LawText (BOM) (07) 219

Criminal Application (APL) No.86 of 2019

2019-07-25

P.N. Deshmukh, Pushpa V. Ganediwala

Mr. Shashikant Borkar for the Applicant, Ms. T. Udeshi for the Non-Applicant/State

Ashish Buddhabharat Nandeshwar

State of Maharashtra

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal application under Section 482 CrPC for quashing of chargesheet.

Remedy Sought

Quashing of chargesheet filed before the Competent Court arising out of FIR No.145 of 2018 for offence under Section 306 r/w 34 IPC.

Filing Reason

Applicant was arrayed as accused no.2 in a case of abetment of suicide based on a dying declaration alleging abuse and teasing eight months prior to the suicide.

Issues

Whether the allegations in the dying declaration and chargesheet constitute an offence under Section 306 IPC against the applicant.

Submissions/Arguments

Applicant's counsel submitted that the deceased committed suicide due to personal reasons (quarrel with aunt and lover's departure) and the alleged incident of abuse in December 2017 was too remote to constitute abetment. State's counsel opposed the application, arguing that the dying declaration disclosed an offence.

Ratio Decidendi

For an offence under Section 306 IPC, there must be active instigation or direct involvement by the accused. Mere harassment or teasing without proximity to the suicide does not constitute abetment. The dying declaration must show clear mens rea for abetment, which was absent in this case.

Judgment Excerpts

Prayer in this petition is for quashing of chargesheet filed before the Competent Court arising out of F.I.R. No.145 of 2018 registered by Police Station, Sakoli, District Bhandara for the offence punishable under Section 306 r/w. 34 of the Indian Penal Code. Learned Counsel for the applicant, however, contended that no such offence can be registered against the applicant even on considering contents of dying declaration as the dying declaration refers to abusing and teasing by applicant in December, 2017 when the deceased did not attend the study circle.

Procedural History

FIR No.145 of 2018 was registered at Police Station Sakoli for offence under Section 306 r/w 34 IPC. Chargesheet was filed before the Competent Court. The applicant filed Criminal Application (APL) No.86 of 2019 under Section 482 CrPC seeking quashing of the chargesheet. The High Court heard the matter and delivered judgment on 25.7.2019.

Acts & Sections

  • Indian Penal Code, 1860: 306, 34
  • Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973: 482
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Application for Cancellation of Bail in Dowry Death Case — No Supervening Circumstances or Misconduct Established. Bail granted to elderly mother-in-law under Section 439 CrPC not cancelled as applicant failed to show mi...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Industrial Dispute Case — Reinstatement Ordered with Continuity of Service but Without Back Wages. Daily Wage Worker's Termination Held Illegal for Non-Compliance with Section 25F of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.