Bombay High Court Sets Aside Caste Scrutiny Committee Order and Directs Fresh Consideration of Caste Claim. The Court held that the Committee cannot reject a claim solely on the ground that the caste certificate is not from the competent authority and must give an opportunity to furnish documents.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: NAGPUR In Favour of Accused
  • 65
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Devendra Mahadeo Nathe, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Nagpur Bench, challenging an order dated 22nd February 2018 passed by the District Caste Certificate Verification Committee, Akola (the Caste Scrutiny Committee). The Committee had rejected the petitioner's caste claim on two grounds: first, that the petitioner had failed to submit certain documents and comply with deficiencies pointed out; and second, that the caste certificate submitted by the petitioner was not from the competent authority. The petitioner sought quashing of the order and a direction to the Committee to reconsider his claim. The High Court, after hearing the counsel for the petitioner and the Assistant Government Pleader for the respondents, disposed of the petition with directions. The Court set aside the impugned order and directed the petitioner to appear before the Committee on 9th April 2019 to furnish all required information and documents. The Committee was directed not to reject the claim solely on the ground that the caste certificate was not from the competent authority, and to decide the caste claim within three months from the date of the judgment. The rule was made absolute with no order as to costs.

Headnote

A) Caste Certificate - Scrutiny - Natural Justice - The Caste Scrutiny Committee rejected the petitioner's claim on the ground that the caste certificate was not from the competent authority and for failure to submit certain documents. The High Court set aside the order and directed the Committee to give the petitioner an opportunity to furnish the required documents and not to reject the claim solely on the ground that the certificate was not from the competent authority. Held that the Committee must decide the claim within three months after giving a proper opportunity. (Paras 2-4)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the Caste Scrutiny Committee was justified in rejecting the petitioner's caste claim on the ground that the caste certificate was not from the competent authority and for failure to submit documents without giving an opportunity to cure the defects.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The High Court set aside the order dated 22nd February 2018 passed by the Caste Scrutiny Committee, Akola. The petitioner was directed to appear before the Committee on 9th April 2019 to furnish all required information and documents. The Committee was directed not to reject the claim on the ground that the caste certificate was not from the competent authority, and to decide the caste claim within three months from the date of the judgment. Rule made absolute with no order as to costs.

Law Points

  • Caste Scrutiny Committee cannot reject claim solely on ground that caste certificate is not from competent authority
  • opportunity to be given to furnish documents
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2019 LawText (BOM) (04) 204

Writ Petition No. 955 of 2019

2019-04-03

R. K. Deshpande, S. M. Modak

Mr. Barun Kumar for Petitioner, Mr. N. S. Rao, AGP for Respondent Nos.1 & 2 – State

Devendra Mahadeo Nathe

District Caste Certificate Verification Committee, Akola & Sub Divisional Officer, Akot

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition challenging order of Caste Scrutiny Committee rejecting caste claim

Remedy Sought

Petitioner sought quashing of the order dated 22nd February 2018 and direction to reconsider his caste claim

Filing Reason

Caste Scrutiny Committee rejected petitioner's caste claim on grounds of failure to submit documents and that caste certificate was not from competent authority

Previous Decisions

Order dated 22nd February 2018 passed by Caste Scrutiny Committee, Akola rejecting petitioner's caste claim

Issues

Whether the Caste Scrutiny Committee was justified in rejecting the caste claim on the ground that the caste certificate was not from the competent authority without giving an opportunity to cure the defect. Whether the Committee's rejection for failure to submit documents was proper without allowing further opportunity.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued that the Committee's order was arbitrary and that he should be given an opportunity to furnish the required documents. Respondents (State) argued through AGP that the Committee's order was based on valid grounds.

Ratio Decidendi

A Caste Scrutiny Committee cannot reject a caste claim solely on the ground that the caste certificate is not from the competent authority; the claimant must be given an opportunity to furnish the required documents and the Committee must decide the claim on merits after providing a proper hearing.

Judgment Excerpts

According to the Caste Scrutiny Committee, the Petitioner has failed to submit certain documents and comply with the deficiencies pointed out. One more reason is that the Caste Certificate submitted by the Petitioner is not from the Competent Authority. The Caste Scrutiny Committee shall not reject the claim on the ground that Caste Certificate produced is not from the Competent Authority.

Procedural History

The petitioner filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Nagpur Bench, challenging the order dated 22nd February 2018 of the District Caste Certificate Verification Committee, Akola. The High Court heard the matter and disposed it on 3rd April 2019 with directions.

Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Sets Aside Caste Scrutiny Committee Order and Directs Fresh Consideration of Caste Claim. The Court held that the Committee cannot reject a claim solely on the ground that the caste certificate is not from the competent authority an...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Against Order Rejecting Plaint for Non-Payment of Court Fees in Suit for Specific Performance. Court Held That Under Section 4 of the Maharashtra Court Fees Act, 1959, Court Fees Must Be Paid on the Market Value o...