Bombay High Court Allows Petition Seeking Payment of Insurance Policy Amount to Nominee. LIC Directed to Pay Balance Interest on Delayed Payment Under Life Insurance Policy.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY In Favour of Prosecution
  • 215
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Ashwin Liladhar Shah, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a mandamus against the Life Insurance Corporation of India (LIC) to honour an insurance policy issued to late Ms. Bharati Bheda, who had nominated the petitioner as beneficiary. The petitioner claimed that LIC failed to pay the policy amount despite the nomination. During the proceedings, LIC agreed to pay and subsequently paid Rs. 45.43 lakhs (inclusive of interest) after tax deduction. However, the petitioner contended that interest was not fully paid. The court examined the limited controversy and directed LIC to pay the balance interest as per the policy terms. The petition was disposed of with directions to LIC to compute and pay the remaining interest within four weeks.

Headnote

A) Insurance Law - Nomination - Payment to Nominee - Life Insurance Corporation Act, 1956 - The petitioner, as nominee of the deceased assured, sought payment under an LIC policy. LIC initially resisted but later paid the principal amount with some interest. The court held that the nominee is entitled to the policy amount and directed LIC to pay the balance interest as per the policy terms. (Paras 1-4)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the petitioner, as nominee of the deceased assured, is entitled to payment under the LIC policy with full interest.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The court disposed of the petition with a direction to LIC to pay the balance interest as per the policy terms within four weeks.

Law Points

  • Nominee entitled to policy amount
  • Interest on delayed payment
  • Writ of mandamus
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2019 LawText (BOM) (04) 241

WRIT PETITION NO. 2356 OF 2018

2019-04-04

A.S. Oka, M.S. Sanklecha

2019:BHC-OS:7889-DB

Mr. Mayur Khandeparkar with Mr. Umesh Tawari, Mr. Kunal Kamath, Ms. Hetal Vithlani and Mr. Hrishikesh Mastikar i/b.Ms. Trisha Yelve, for the Petitioner. Ms. Pooja P. Joshi, for Respondent No.1. Mr. Durgaprasad Sabnis, for Respondent No.3. Mr. Shriniwas Bhave with Ms. Sunayana Kashid i/b. Bhave & Co., for Respondent No.3.

Ashwin Liladhar Shah

Life Insurance Corporation of India, The Ld. Insurance Ombudsman, Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority of India

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition under Article 226 seeking mandamus to direct LIC to honour insurance policy.

Remedy Sought

Petitioner sought direction to LIC to pay policy amount with interest to nominee.

Filing Reason

LIC failed to pay the policy amount to the nominee despite nomination.

Issues

Whether the petitioner, as nominee, is entitled to payment under the LIC policy with full interest.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued that LIC should pay the policy amount with interest. LIC initially resisted but later paid principal with some interest, but petitioner claimed interest was not fully paid.

Ratio Decidendi

A nominee of a life insurance policy is entitled to the policy amount and interest as per the policy terms. LIC must honour its obligation to pay the nominee.

Judgment Excerpts

This Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeks a writ of mandamus to Respondent No.1 Life Insurance Corporation of India (LIC), directing it to honour the LIC Policy (the said Policy) issued to late Ms. Bharati Bheda. Consequent to the above, on 28th March, 2019 when this Petition came up for consideration, we were informed by the Counsel for the Respondent No.1 LIC that it had in terms of its statement made on 15th March, 2019 paid the amount of Rs.45.43 lakhs (inclusive of interest) after deduction of tax at source under the said policy to the Petitioner.

Procedural History

Petition filed under Article 226. On 15 March 2019, LIC agreed to pay within one week. On 28 March 2019, LIC informed payment of Rs.45.43 lakhs. Petitioner claimed interest not fully paid. Court directed LIC to pay balance interest within four weeks.

Acts & Sections

  • Constitution of India: Article 226
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Land Acquisition Compensation Case — Enhances Compensation for Acquired Agricultural Land. Court held that market value must be determined based on potential use and comparable sales, not merely classification as ...
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Upholds Municipal Employee's Declaration That Dismissal Was Void for Violation of Mandatory Rule 143 of Bombay District Municipal Act, 1901. Dismissal Without Reasonable Opportunity to Defend and Without Written Order Rendered Ultra Vir...