Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Murder Based on Dying Declaration in Kerosene Burning Case. Dying declaration found reliable despite minor discrepancies; conviction under Section 302 IPC confirmed.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY In Favour of Prosecution
  • 6
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The appellant, Ashwini Rammeher Sharma, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge at Sewree, Mumbai, for the murder of his wife Vijaya under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) and sentenced to life imprisonment. The prosecution case was based on the dying declaration of the victim, who stated that on 3 November 2010, around 4:00 p.m., a quarrel occurred between her and the appellant, and he poured kerosene on her and set her on fire. The victim was taken to KEM Hospital, where her statement was recorded by Police Sub-Inspector Krishna Chavan (PW11) and treated as a dying declaration. The appellant challenged the conviction, arguing that the dying declaration was unreliable, that he had tried to save the victim and suffered injuries, and that the trial court ignored evidence of neighbours (PW3 and PW4) who stated that the appellant extinguished the fire. The State argued that the dying declaration was genuine and corroborated by other evidence. The High Court examined the evidence, including the testimony of PW11, the medical officer (PW2), and the neighbours. The court noted that the dying declaration was recorded in the presence of a doctor who certified the victim's consciousness. The court found that the appellant's conduct of taking the victim to hospital did not absolve him, and the injuries on his hand could be self-inflicted or caused while pouring kerosene. The court held that the dying declaration was reliable, voluntary, and consistent with medical evidence. The appeal was dismissed, and the conviction and sentence were upheld.

Headnote

A) Criminal Law - Murder - Dying Declaration - Section 302 IPC, Section 32 Indian Evidence Act, 1872 - Conviction based on dying declaration - The appellant was convicted for murder of his wife by pouring kerosene and setting her on fire. The dying declaration recorded by a police officer was challenged on grounds of lack of time, absence of magistrate, and inconsistencies. The court held that the dying declaration was reliable, voluntary, and corroborated by medical evidence and other witnesses. The appeal was dismissed. (Paras 1-7)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the dying declaration of the deceased was reliable and sufficient to sustain the conviction of the appellant under Section 302 IPC.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The appeal is dismissed. The conviction and sentence of life imprisonment under Section 302 IPC are upheld.

Law Points

  • Dying declaration
  • reliability of dying declaration
  • corroboration
  • Section 302 IPC
  • Section 32 Indian Evidence Act
  • 1872
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2019 LawText (BOM) (04) 108

Criminal Appeal No.788 of 2013

2019-04-08

B. P. Dharmadhikari, Prakash D. Naik

Mrs. Neha Bhide for the Appellant, Mr. V. V. Gangurde, APP for the Respondent

Ashwini Rammeher Sharma

The State of Maharashtra

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal appeal against conviction for murder under Section 302 IPC.

Remedy Sought

Appellant sought acquittal by challenging the conviction and life sentence.

Filing Reason

Appellant was convicted for murder of his wife by pouring kerosene and setting her on fire.

Previous Decisions

Trial court convicted appellant and sentenced to life imprisonment on 30/3/2013.

Issues

Whether the dying declaration of the deceased was reliable and sufficient to sustain the conviction. Whether the trial court erred in ignoring the appellant's conduct of trying to save the victim.

Submissions/Arguments

Appellant argued that the dying declaration was unreliable, fake, and not recorded in presence of magistrate; he tried to extinguish fire and suffered injuries. Respondent argued that the dying declaration was genuine, corroborated by medical evidence and witnesses, and trial court's findings were cogent.

Ratio Decidendi

A dying declaration can be the sole basis for conviction if it is reliable, voluntary, and consistent with other evidence. Minor discrepancies do not discredit it. The conduct of the accused in trying to save the victim does not negate the dying declaration.

Judgment Excerpts

The appellant is convicted for the offence punishable under section 302 of IPC and sentenced to suffer imprisonment for life vide judgment and order dated 30/3/2013 passed by the Learned Additional Sessions Judge at Sewree, Mumbai. The case of prosecution is based on the statement of victim which was treated as dying declaration. The victim has clearly stated that the appellant has poured kerosene and set her on fire.

Procedural History

The appellant was convicted and sentenced by the Additional Sessions Judge at Sewree, Mumbai on 30/3/2013. He appealed to the High Court under Section 374 Cr.P.C. The High Court heard the appeal and dismissed it on 8/4/2019.

Acts & Sections

  • Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC): 302
  • Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr.P.C.): 374
  • Indian Evidence Act, 1872: 32
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Insurer's Petition Challenging MACT Order on Preliminary Issue in Motor Accident Claim. Subrogation Rights of Insurer Upheld Under Section 166 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Workman's Writ Petition Challenging Labour Court Award in Industrial Dispute — Termination Upheld as Workman Failed to Prove 240 Days of Continuous Service. Labour Court's Finding of Fact Not Perverse, No Interference Un...