Bombay High Court Allows Petition of Widow Seeking Compensation Under Farmer Accident Death Scheme. Taluka Agricultural Officer Directed to Forward Claim Proposal to Insurance Company for Decision.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: AURANGABAD In Favour of Accused
  • 62
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Smt. Sunanda w/o. Shrihari Adhapure, filed a writ petition challenging the communication dated 4.1.2011 from the Taluka Agricultural Officer, Shirur, which returned her proposal for compensation under a Government scheme covering risk of death of farmers in accidents. The petitioner's husband died on 8.8.2008, and she filed the claim on 27.10.2010. The Agricultural Officer returned the proposal on the ground that it was not received within the prescribed 90-day period. The High Court observed that under the scheme, the Government pays the premium for farmers, and the liability to pay compensation lies with the Insurance Company. The Agricultural Officer is only a forwarding authority and must send the proposal along with all papers to the Insurance Company, which has the authority to decide the claim. The Court directed the Taluka Agricultural Officer to forward the proposal to the Insurance Company within 15 days. The petition was allowed and disposed of accordingly.

Headnote

A) Insurance Law - Government Scheme for Farmers' Accident Death - Forwarding of Proposal - The Taluka Agricultural Officer is bound to forward the proposal to the Insurance Company with available material, and the Insurance Company has the liability to decide the claim - The Officer cannot reject the proposal on the ground of delay, as the scheme provides for consideration beyond 90 days in exceptional circumstances (Paras 1-2).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the Taluka Agricultural Officer can reject a claim proposal under the Government scheme for farmers' accident death on the ground of delay, or whether the Officer is bound to forward the proposal to the Insurance Company for decision.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The petition is allowed. The Taluka Agricultural Officer is directed to send the proposal along with all papers to the Insurance Company within 15 days from the date of the judgment.

Law Points

  • Government scheme for farmers' accident death
  • forwarding of proposal by Agricultural Officer
  • Insurance Company's liability to decide claim
  • limitation period of 90 days with exceptional circumstances
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2019 LawText (BOM) (03) 172

Writ Petition No. 1293 of 2014

2019-03-07

T.V. Nalawade, Sunil K. Kotwal

Mr. N.B. Narwade for petitioner, Mr. A.V. Deshmukh, AGP for respondents

Smt. Sunanda w/o. Shrihari Adhapure

The State of Maharashtra, Taluka Agricultural Officer, District Superintendent Agricultural

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition challenging communication returning proposal for compensation under Government scheme for farmers' accident death.

Remedy Sought

Petitioner sought direction to Taluka Agricultural Officer to forward her claim proposal to Insurance Company.

Filing Reason

Taluka Agricultural Officer returned the proposal on ground of delay beyond 90 days.

Issues

Whether the Taluka Agricultural Officer can reject a claim proposal on ground of delay under the Government scheme for farmers' accident death.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued that the proposal was within time or at least could be considered in exceptional circumstances. Respondents argued that the proposal was not received within 90 days.

Ratio Decidendi

Under the Government scheme for farmers' accident death, the liability to pay compensation lies with the Insurance Company. The Agricultural Officer is bound to forward the proposal to the Insurance Company with available material, and the Insurance Company has the authority to decide the claim. The Officer cannot reject the proposal on the ground of delay.

Judgment Excerpts

The Agricultural Officer is bound to forward the proposal to Insurance Company with whatever material available and then it is up to the Insurance Company to take decision.

Procedural History

The petitioner filed a claim on 27.10.2010 after her husband's death on 8.8.2008. The Taluka Agricultural Officer returned the proposal on 4.1.2011 on the ground of delay. The petitioner then filed the present writ petition in 2014.

Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Petition of Widow Seeking Compensation Under Farmer Accident Death Scheme. Taluka Agricultural Officer Directed to Forward Claim Proposal to Insurance Company for Decision.
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Sets Aside Civil Imprisonment Order in Injunction Execution Case — Executing Court Must Record Willful Disobedience Before Ordering Detention Under Order 21 Rule 32 CPC. The Court held that an order for civil imprisonment under Or...