Bombay High Court Upholds Life Conviction for Murder in Knife Attack Case. Appellant convicted under Section 302 IPC for stabbing deceased 4-5 times following a verbal altercation, with conviction based on eyewitness testimony and medical evidence.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY In Favour of Prosecution
  • 53
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The appellant, Dharmaraj alias Sai Laxman Das, was convicted by the Sessions Court for the murder of Yusuf Shaikh under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code and sentenced to life imprisonment. The incident occurred on 20 May 2010 at about 11:45 p.m. in front of a building in Mumbai. The deceased had a quarrel with his wife and later went downstairs, where he began abusing his brother Bilal Shaikh. The appellant, who was standing on his balcony on the fifth floor, felt that the deceased was shouting at him and asked whether he should come down. The deceased responded provocatively. The appellant then climbed down five floors and stabbed the deceased 4-5 times with a knife. The deceased was rushed to Rajawadi Hospital but was declared brought dead. The police apprehended the appellant within an hour. The prosecution examined eyewitnesses, including the mother of the deceased (PW-1) and the brother (PW-2), as well as medical evidence. The trial court found the evidence credible and convicted the appellant. The appellant appealed to the High Court, challenging the conviction. The High Court heard arguments from both sides and perused the record. The court found that the eyewitness testimony was consistent and corroborated by medical evidence. The court held that the prosecution had proved its case beyond reasonable doubt and that the conviction under Section 302 IPC was justified. The appeal was dismissed, and the conviction and sentence were upheld.

Headnote

A) Criminal Law - Murder - Section 302 Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Conviction based on eyewitness testimony and medical evidence - Appellant inflicted 4-5 knife blows on deceased following a verbal altercation - Deceased died due to stab wounds - Held that the prosecution proved its case beyond reasonable doubt and the conviction was proper (Paras 1-4).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the conviction of the appellant under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code for murder is sustainable based on the evidence on record.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

Appeal dismissed. Conviction and sentence under Section 302 IPC upheld.

Law Points

  • Murder
  • Section 302 IPC
  • Life Imprisonment
  • Eyewitness Testimony
  • Medical Evidence
  • Intent to Kill
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2019 LawText (BOM) (03) 78

Criminal Appeal No. 1462 of 2011

2019-02-05

A. S. Oka, A. S. Gadkari

Ms. Payoshi Roy I/by Dr. Y.M. Chaudhary for the Appellant, Mr. J.P. Yagnik, APP for the Respondent-State

Dharmaraj Alias Sai Laxman Das

The State of Maharashtra

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal appeal against conviction for murder

Remedy Sought

Appellant sought acquittal from conviction under Section 302 IPC

Filing Reason

Appellant was convicted and sentenced to life imprisonment for murder

Previous Decisions

Trial court convicted appellant under Section 302 IPC and sentenced to life imprisonment

Issues

Whether the conviction under Section 302 IPC is sustainable based on evidence

Submissions/Arguments

Appellant argued that the conviction was not sustainable Respondent-State argued that the conviction was proper based on evidence

Ratio Decidendi

The prosecution proved its case beyond reasonable doubt through consistent eyewitness testimony and medical evidence, establishing that the appellant intentionally caused the death of the deceased by stabbing him multiple times.

Judgment Excerpts

The Appellant has impugned the Judgment and Order dated 22nd September, 2011 passed by the learned Second Additional Principal Judge, City Sessions Fast-Track Court, Sewree, Mumbai in Sessions Case No. 541 of 2010, convicting the Appellant under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code and sentenced him to suffer rigorous imprisonment for life and to pay a fine of Rs.5,000/ in default of payment to suffer further rigorous imprisonment for one month.

Procedural History

The appellant was convicted by the Sessions Court on 22 September 2011. He appealed to the High Court. The High Court reserved judgment on 17 January 2019 and pronounced on 5 February 2019, dismissing the appeal.

Acts & Sections

  • Indian Penal Code, 1860: 302
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Madras High Court Directs Eviction of Encroachers in Government Lane Case Under Pondicherry Municipalities Act, 1973 — Authorities Ordered to Follow Mandatory Procedures Within Twelve Weeks. Encroachment on Government Lane Identified; Court Directs...
Related Judgement
High Court Gujarat High Court Quashes GST Order for Non-Compliance with Section 161 of CGST Act — Remands for Fresh Speaking Order. Order-in-Original failed to satisfy ingredients of Section 161 of Central Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017, leading to withdrawa...