Bombay High Court Dismisses Third Bail Application of Convicted Murderer in Single Blow Case. Court holds that repeated bail applications on same grounds are not maintainable and that the nature of injury indicates intention to cause death under Section 302 IPC.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY In Favour of Prosecution
  • 14
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The applicant, Ashok Pundalik Gavade, was convicted under Section 302 read with 34 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) for the murder of Gurunath, a waiter in a hotel at Chandgad. The incident occurred on 5 February 2014 when the deceased was serving the applicant and his friend, and some water spilled on the table, leading to an altercation. The applicant allegedly threatened the deceased, and later, when the deceased was proceeding to the police station to lodge a complaint, the applicant took a bamboo stick from his car, followed him, and inflicted a blow on his head. The deceased succumbed to the injuries on 8 February 2014. The post-mortem report revealed a fracture of the right parietal bone extending across the right temporal bone and into the right side middle cranial fossa, with laceration of the membrane beneath the fractures and subdural and subarachnoid hemorrhage. The learned Sessions Judge held the applicant guilty of murder. The applicant filed a bail application (Bail Application No.1563/2015) which was not pressed and dismissed with liberty to file a fresh application. A second bail application (Criminal Bail Application No.489/2016) was dismissed on merits on 20 April 2016. The applicant then filed a third application for suspension of sentence and release on bail pending appeal. The applicant's counsel argued that there were contradictions and omissions in the evidence of the first informant and that the conviction under Section 302 IPC was not justified as the applicant had inflicted only a single blow without premeditation. The court, however, noted that the nature of the injury was sufficient in the ordinary course of nature to cause death, and that repeated bail applications on the same grounds without change in circumstances are not maintainable. The court dismissed the application.

Headnote

A) Criminal Procedure - Bail - Suspension of Sentence - Repeated Applications - The applicant, convicted under Section 302 IPC, filed a third application for suspension of sentence and bail pending appeal. The court held that repeated bail applications on the same grounds without change in circumstances are not maintainable. The earlier applications were dismissed on merits, and no new grounds were urged. (Paras 1-6)

B) Indian Penal Code - Murder - Single Blow - Section 302 IPC - The court observed that the nature of the injury, a fracture of the right parietal bone extending across the right temporal bone with subdural and subarachnoid hemorrhage, was sufficient in the ordinary course of nature to cause death. Hence, the conviction under Section 302 IPC was justified despite the single blow. (Paras 2-4)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the applicant is entitled to suspension of sentence and release on bail pending appeal, particularly when two earlier bail applications have been dismissed and no new grounds have been raised.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The application is dismissed.

Law Points

  • Repeated bail applications on same grounds not maintainable
  • Single blow can constitute murder under Section 302 IPC if injury is sufficient in ordinary course of nature to cause death
  • Suspension of sentence pending appeal requires exceptional circumstances
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2019 LawText (BOM) (01) 97

Criminal Application No.1301 of 2018 in Criminal Appeal No.1155 of 2015

2019-01-30

Smt. Sadhana S. Jadhav, Smt. Anuja Prabhudessai

Mr. Umesh R. Mankapure for the applicant, Mr. H.J. Dedhiya, APP for the State

Ashok Pundalik Gavade

The State of Maharashtra

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal application for suspension of sentence and release on bail pending appeal against conviction for murder.

Remedy Sought

The applicant sought suspension of his sentence and release on bail pending the appeal.

Filing Reason

The applicant was convicted under Section 302 IPC for murder and had filed multiple bail applications; this was the third application.

Previous Decisions

The first bail application (Bail Application No.1563/2015) was not pressed and dismissed with liberty to file fresh application. The second bail application (Criminal Bail Application No.489/2016) was dismissed on merits on 20/04/2016.

Issues

Whether the applicant is entitled to suspension of sentence and release on bail pending appeal. Whether repeated bail applications on the same grounds are maintainable.

Submissions/Arguments

The applicant's counsel argued that there are contradictions and omissions in the evidence of the first informant and that the conviction under Section 302 IPC is not justified as the applicant inflicted only a single blow without premeditation. The State opposed the application, presumably on the grounds that the earlier applications were dismissed on merits and no new grounds were raised.

Ratio Decidendi

Repeated bail applications on the same grounds without change in circumstances are not maintainable. The nature of the injury, being a fracture of the right parietal bone extending across the right temporal bone with subdural and subarachnoid hemorrhage, was sufficient in the ordinary course of nature to cause death, justifying conviction under Section 302 IPC despite a single blow.

Judgment Excerpts

This is the third application filed by the aforesaid Applicant, who has been convicted in Sessions Case No.11/2014 for offence under Section 302 r/w. 34 of the IPC, for suspension of sentence and his release on bail. The second bail application was dismissed on merits, by order dated 20/04/2016. He has tried to assail the veracity of the prosecution case and has questioned the conviction under Section 302 of the IPC when the accusation against the applicant that he had inflicted a single blow without any premedication.

Procedural History

The applicant was convicted in Sessions Case No.11/2014 under Section 302 r/w 34 IPC. He filed a bail application (Bail Application No.1563/2015) which was not pressed and dismissed with liberty to file fresh application. He filed a second bail application (Criminal Bail Application No.489/2016) which was dismissed on merits on 20/04/2016. He then filed the present third application for suspension of sentence and bail pending appeal.

Acts & Sections

  • Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC): 302, 34
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Third Bail Application of Convicted Murderer in Single Blow Case. Court holds that repeated bail applications on same grounds are not maintainable and that the nature of injury indicates intention to cause death under Sect...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Against Order Permitting Deposit of Costs in Suit for Possession — Payment into Court Instead of Directly to Plaintiff Held Valid Compliance with Conditional Decree. The court held that under Order XXI Rule 1(1)...