Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder and Attempt to Murder Case Due to Lack of Intent and Insufficient Evidence. Poisoning of Child and Self Not Proved to be Deliberate Act Under Sections 302, 307, 309 IPC.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY In Favour of Accused
  • 1
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The appellant, Rekha Rajendra Magar, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Satara for the murder of her son Ranjit (Section 302 IPC), attempt to murder her daughter Komal (Section 307 IPC), and attempt to commit suicide (Section 309 IPC). The prosecution case was that on the day of the incident, the appellant was alone with her two children. Neighbor Anuradha heard shouts and found the appellant and her son Ranjit lying unconscious with foam and smell of poison. Ranjit died on the way to hospital due to organophosphorus poisoning. Komal also consumed poison but survived. The appellant's defense was that she was harassed by her husband and mother-in-law, and she consumed poison in a fit of depression, and the children might have consumed it accidentally. The High Court held that the evidence was purely circumstantial and did not prove beyond reasonable doubt that the appellant administered poison to her children with intent to kill. The circumstances were consistent with the appellant attempting suicide and the children consuming poison accidentally. The court noted that the appellant herself was unconscious and there was no evidence of prior preparation or motive. The court also observed that the daughter Komal did not support the prosecution and was not examined. Consequently, the court allowed the appeal, set aside the conviction, and acquitted the appellant of all charges.

Headnote

A) Criminal Law - Murder - Section 302 Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Circumstantial Evidence - Appellant convicted for poisoning her son - Held that prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that appellant administered poison with intention to cause death - Circumstances consistent with suicide attempt rather than murder - Acquittal (Paras 1-12).

B) Criminal Law - Attempt to Murder - Section 307 Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Poisoning of Daughter - Held that no evidence of intent to kill daughter - Daughter survived and no complaint - Acquittal (Paras 1-12).

C) Criminal Law - Attempt to Suicide - Section 309 Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Appellant also consumed poison - Held that conviction under Section 309 is not sustainable as the appellant was in unconscious state and no evidence of intent - Acquittal (Paras 1-12).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the appellant is guilty of murder, attempt to murder, and attempt to suicide based on circumstantial evidence.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

Appeal allowed. Conviction and sentence set aside. Appellant acquitted of all charges. She be set at liberty forthwith.

Law Points

  • Circumstantial evidence
  • lack of intent
  • suicide attempt not murder
  • acquittal for lack of evidence
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2012 LawText (BOM) (12) 49

Criminal Appeal No. 765 of 2005

2012-12-05

Smt. V.K. Tahilramani, A.R. Joshi

Mr Shailesh Chavan, Advocate, appointed for the Appellant. Mr S.A.Shaikh, Additional Public Prosecutor, for the State.

Rekha Rajendra Magar

The State of Maharashtra

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal appeal against conviction for murder, attempt to murder, and attempt to suicide.

Remedy Sought

Appellant sought acquittal from the High Court.

Filing Reason

Appellant was convicted by the trial court and appealed against the conviction.

Previous Decisions

Trial court convicted appellant under Sections 302, 307, 309 IPC and sentenced to life imprisonment and other terms.

Issues

Whether the circumstantial evidence proves beyond reasonable doubt that the appellant administered poison to her son with intent to cause death. Whether the appellant attempted to murder her daughter by administering poison. Whether the appellant attempted to commit suicide.

Submissions/Arguments

Appellant argued that she was harassed by her husband and mother-in-law, and consumed poison in a fit of depression; children might have consumed accidentally. Prosecution argued that appellant intentionally poisoned her children and herself.

Ratio Decidendi

In cases of circumstantial evidence, the chain of circumstances must be complete and consistent only with the guilt of the accused. Here, the circumstances were equally consistent with the appellant's defense of suicide attempt and accidental poisoning of children. Hence, benefit of doubt given.

Judgment Excerpts

The appellant-original accused herein is a lady. The prosecution case, briefly stated, is as under :- Charge came to be framed against the appellant-original accused under section 302 of Indian Penal Code...

Procedural History

Trial court convicted appellant on 31.10.2003. Appellant filed appeal on 2005. High Court decided on 5.12.2012.

Acts & Sections

  • Indian Penal Code, 1860: 302, 307, 309
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder and Attempt to Murder Case Due to Lack of Intent and Insufficient Evidence. Poisoning of Child and Self Not Proved to be Deliberate Act Under Sections 302, 307, 309 IPC.
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Corporation's Petition Against Industrial Court Directions in Union Subscription Dispute. No Unfair Labour Practice Established Due to Lack of Evidence, Industrial Court Exceeded Jurisdiction by Issuing Directions Without Fin...