Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Murder in Love Affair Dispute — Life Imprisonment Maintained for Stabbing Victim with Knife. Evidence of Eyewitnesses and Medical Reports Sufficient to Prove Guilt Under Section 302 IPC.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY In Favour of Prosecution
  • 117
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The appellant, Paneer Selvam Subramanyam Pille, was convicted by the 2nd Ad hoc Additional Sessions Judge, Kalyan, for the murder of Saida under Section 302 IPC and for attempting to commit suicide under Section 309 IPC. The incident occurred on 5 February 2003 at about 7:00 pm in Madrasipada, Ulhasnagar. The appellant had a love affair with the victim, who was married to Suresh (PW-3). On the day of the incident, the appellant quarreled with the victim and asked her to accompany him. When she refused, he stabbed her multiple times with a knife, causing nine incised wounds on her chest, legs, and hands. The victim died on the spot. The appellant then inflicted self-injuries on his abdomen. Eyewitnesses PW-1 (Saraswatibai Naidu, a social worker) and PW-2 (Nimira, the victim's 10-year-old daughter) witnessed the assault. The FIR was lodged by PW-1. The appellant was arrested on 8 February 2003 after treatment. The trial court convicted him, sentencing him to life imprisonment and a fine of Rs.2,000 for murder, and no separate sentence for the attempt to commit suicide. The appellant appealed to the Bombay High Court. The High Court, after hearing arguments, found that the prosecution had proved its case beyond reasonable doubt through the consistent testimony of eyewitnesses and medical evidence. The court dismissed the appeal and upheld the conviction and sentence.

Headnote

A) Criminal Law - Murder - Section 302 IPC - Conviction based on eyewitness testimony and medical evidence - Appellant stabbed victim multiple times with a knife after she refused to accompany him - Eyewitnesses PW-1 and PW-2 corroborated the incident - Medical evidence showed nine incised wounds on vital parts - Held that the prosecution proved its case beyond reasonable doubt (Paras 1-10).

B) Criminal Law - Attempt to Commit Suicide - Section 309 IPC - Self-inflicted injuries after murder - Appellant inflicted injuries on his own abdomen after assaulting victim - Conviction under Section 309 IPC upheld but no separate sentence imposed (Paras 2, 10).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the conviction of the appellant under Section 302 IPC and Section 309 IPC is sustainable based on the evidence on record.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The appeal is dismissed. The conviction and sentence under Section 302 IPC (life imprisonment and fine of Rs.2,000) and Section 309 IPC (no separate sentence) are upheld.

Law Points

  • Murder
  • Section 302 IPC
  • Attempt to commit suicide
  • Section 309 IPC
  • Eyewitness testimony
  • Medical evidence
  • Motive
  • Love affair
  • Self-inflicted injuries
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2012 LawText (BOM) (12) 47

Criminal Appeal No. 756 of 2005

2012-12-11

Smt. V.K. Tahilramani, A.R. Joshi

Shri A.L. Mookhtiar for the Appellant, Shri S.A. Shaikh, Additional Public Prosecutor for the State

Paneer Selvam Subramanyam Pille

The State of Maharashtra

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal appeal against conviction for murder and attempt to commit suicide.

Remedy Sought

Appellant sought acquittal from the conviction and sentence under Sections 302 and 309 IPC.

Filing Reason

Appellant was convicted by the trial court for murder and attempt to commit suicide, and he challenged the conviction.

Previous Decisions

The 2nd Ad hoc Additional Sessions Judge, Kalyan, convicted the appellant on 11.3.2005 under Section 302 IPC (life imprisonment and fine) and Section 309 IPC (no separate sentence).

Issues

Whether the conviction under Section 302 IPC is sustainable based on the evidence of eyewitnesses and medical reports. Whether the conviction under Section 309 IPC is sustainable.

Submissions/Arguments

Appellant argued that the evidence was insufficient and that the conviction was based on unreliable testimony. Respondent argued that the prosecution proved its case beyond reasonable doubt through eyewitnesses and medical evidence.

Ratio Decidendi

The conviction for murder under Section 302 IPC is sustainable when the prosecution proves beyond reasonable doubt through credible eyewitness testimony and medical evidence that the accused intentionally caused the death of the victim by inflicting multiple knife blows on vital parts.

Judgment Excerpts

Heard rival submissions on this criminal appeal preferred by the appellant-accused challenging the judgment and order of conviction dated 11.3.2005 passed by 2nd Ad hoc Additional Sessions Judge, Kalyan. By the impugned judgment and order, the appellant-accused was convicted for the offence under section 302 of IPC and was sentenced to suffer life imprisonment and to pay a fine of Rs.2,000/- in default to suffer SI for three months. The appellant-accused was also convicted for the offence under Section 309 of IPC. However, no separate sentence was imposed on him.

Procedural History

The appellant was convicted on 11.3.2005 by the 2nd Ad hoc Additional Sessions Judge, Kalyan, under Sections 302 and 309 IPC. He filed Criminal Appeal No. 756 of 2005 before the Bombay High Court, which was heard and dismissed on 11.12.2012.

Acts & Sections

  • Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC): 302, 309
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Partially Allows Challenges to Arbitral Award in Development Agreement Dispute. Court upholds award on termination and damages but modifies interest rate and clarifies that the builder is entitled to retain constructed area as per a...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Pension Computation from Initial Temporary Appointment as Seasonal Godown Keeper — Rule 30 of Maharashtra Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1982 Mandates Counting of Entire Service from First Appointment. The court held that ...