Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Maintenance Order in Favor of Step-Mother Under Section 125 Cr.P.C. — Step-Mother Held Entitled to Maintenance from Step-Sons as Widow, Following Supreme Court's Liberal Interpretation of 'Mother'.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: AURANGABAD In Favour of Prosecution
  • 2
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The case involves a criminal application filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr.P.C.) and Article 227 of the Constitution of India, challenging an order passed by the Judicial Magistrate First Class (JMFC), Degloor, in M.C.A. No. 37/01. The JMFC had granted interim maintenance of Rs. 750 per month in favor of the respondent, Smt. Radhabai Gopalkishan Chetlawar, who is the step-mother of the petitioners, Dr. Ravikumar Gopalkishan Chetlawar and Shrinivas Gopalkishan Chetlawar. The petitioners challenged the order primarily on the ground that the respondent, being their step-mother, is not entitled to maintenance under Section 125 Cr.P.C. They relied on a Bombay High Court decision in Ramabai w/o G.M. Balraj v. Dinesh s/o G.M. Balraj and another (1976 Mh.L.J. 565), which held that a step-mother is not covered under Section 125 Cr.P.C. The respondent, on the other hand, relied on the Supreme Court decision in Kirtikant D. Vadodaria v. State of Gujarat (1996 (4) SCC 479), which held that a childless step-mother may claim maintenance from her step-son provided she is a widow or her husband is incapable of maintaining her. The High Court, after hearing both sides, followed the Supreme Court's liberal construction of Section 125 Cr.P.C. and held that the term 'mother' includes a step-mother. The Court noted that the respondent is the step-mother of the petitioners and that she is a widow, as her husband (the petitioners' father) is deceased. Therefore, she is entitled to maintenance from the petitioners. The Court dismissed the application, upholding the JMFC's order granting interim maintenance of Rs. 750 per month. The Court directed the petitioners to pay the maintenance regularly and also directed the JMFC to expedite the final disposal of the maintenance proceeding.

Headnote

A) Criminal Procedure Code - Maintenance - Step-Mother - Section 125 Cr.P.C. - Interpretation of 'Mother' - The issue was whether a step-mother can claim maintenance from her step-sons under Section 125 Cr.P.C. - The Court held that the term 'mother' in Section 125 includes a step-mother, relying on the Supreme Court's liberal construction to achieve the legislative intent - A childless step-mother may claim maintenance from her step-son provided she is a widow or her husband is incapable of maintaining her (Paras 2-4).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether a step-mother is entitled to claim maintenance from her step-sons under Section 125 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The application is dismissed. The order of JMFC granting interim maintenance of Rs. 750 per month is upheld. The petitioners are directed to pay the maintenance regularly. The JMFC is directed to expedite the final disposal of the maintenance proceeding.

Law Points

  • Step-mother is included within the term 'mother' under Section 125 Cr.P.C. for maintenance claims
  • Liberal construction of Section 125 Cr.P.C. to achieve legislative intent
  • Childless step-mother can claim maintenance from step-son if she is a widow or her husband is incapable of maintaining her
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2012 LawText (BOM) (10) 38

Criminal Application No. 1486/2001

2012-10-11

T.V. Nalawade, J.

Ms. Manjushri Shendge h/f Shri P.R. Katneshwar for petitioners; Shri V.P. Deshmukh h/f Shri P.V. Mandlik for respondent

Dr. Ravikumar s/o Gopalkishan Chetlawar and Shrinivas s/o Gopalkishan Chetlawar

Smt. Radhabai Gopalkishan Chetlawar

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. and Article 227 of the Constitution challenging an order granting interim maintenance in a maintenance proceeding under Section 125 Cr.P.C.

Remedy Sought

The petitioners sought to quash the order of JMFC granting interim maintenance of Rs. 750 per month to the respondent.

Filing Reason

The petitioners challenged the order on the ground that the respondent, being their step-mother, is not entitled to maintenance under Section 125 Cr.P.C.

Previous Decisions

The JMFC, Degloor, in M.C.A. No. 37/01, granted interim maintenance of Rs. 750 per month in favor of the respondent.

Issues

Whether a step-mother is entitled to claim maintenance from her step-sons under Section 125 Cr.P.C.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioners argued that the respondent is their step-mother and not covered under Section 125 Cr.P.C., relying on Ramabai v. Dinesh (1976 Mh.L.J. 565). Respondent argued that a step-mother is entitled to maintenance under Section 125 Cr.P.C., relying on Kirtikant D. Vadodaria v. State of Gujarat (1996 (4) SCC 479).

Ratio Decidendi

The term 'mother' in Section 125 Cr.P.C. includes a step-mother. A childless step-mother may claim maintenance from her step-son provided she is a widow or her husband is incapable of maintaining her. The provision must be given a liberal construction to achieve the legislative intent of preventing vagrancy and destitution.

Judgment Excerpts

Having regard to this special object the provisions of Section 125 of the Code have to be given a liberal construction to fulfil and achieve this intention of the legislature. Consequently, to achieve this objective, in our opinion, a childless stepmother may claim maintenance from her stepson provided she is a widow or her husband, if living, is also incapable of supporting and maintaining her.

Procedural History

The respondent filed a maintenance proceeding under Section 125 Cr.P.C. before JMFC, Degloor (M.C.A. No. 37/01). The JMFC granted interim maintenance of Rs. 750 per month vide order on Exh.5. The petitioners challenged this order by filing Criminal Application No. 1486/2001 under Section 482 Cr.P.C. and Article 227 of the Constitution before the Bombay High Court, Bench at Aurangabad. The High Court heard both sides and dismissed the application on 11th October 2012.

Acts & Sections

  • Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr.P.C.): 125, 482
  • Constitution of India: Article 227
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Maintenance Order in Favor of Step-Mother Under Section 125 Cr.P.C. — Step-Mother Held Entitled to Maintenance from Step-Sons as Widow, Following Supreme Court's Liberal Interpretation of 'Mother'.
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Partly Allows MIDC Appeal and Dismisses Claimant's Cross Objection in Land Acquisition Compensation Case. Reference Court's enhancement of compensation from Rs.26,500 to Rs.1,25,000 per hectare upheld as based on evidence, but furth...