Bombay High Court Dismisses Civil Revision Against Wakf Tribunal's Injunction Order. Temporary Injunction Restraining Construction on Wakf Property Upheld as Property is Public Wakf Under Wakf Act, 1995.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: AURANGABAD In Favour of Prosecution
  • 5
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The case involves a civil revision application challenging an order dated 28th May 2012 passed by the Maharashtra Wakf Tribunal, Aurangabad, allowing the respondents' application for temporary injunction in Wakf Suit No.54 of 2011. The property in question, City Survey No.2543 at Aurangabad, is admitted to be a Wakf property. It is a rectangular plot with two structures: an Ashurkhana on the southeast and a residential house on the north side, occupied by the petitioners (defendant nos.1 and 2) and their family. There is an open space on the western side of the Ashurkhana. The respondents (plaintiffs) filed the suit seeking an injunction to prevent the petitioners from erecting further construction on the suit plot. On the date of filing (29th June 2011), the petitioners had commenced construction on the open space using cement concrete. By the time the temporary injunction was passed, the construction had reached the ground floor ceiling. The Tribunal, after hearing all sides, passed the impugned order preventing further construction. The learned Judge of the Tribunal held that since the suit plot and the open space behind the Ashurkhana is public property, no construction should be permitted. The High Court, in revision, examined the facts and found that the Tribunal's order was justified. The court noted that the property is Wakf and public, and the petitioners had no right to construct without permission. The balance of convenience was in favor of the respondents, and the petitioners would not suffer irreparable loss as they could be compensated. The High Court dismissed the civil revision application, upholding the Tribunal's order.

Headnote

A) Wakf Law - Temporary Injunction - Public Property - Sections 83, 85 of Wakf Act, 1995 - The Wakf Tribunal granted temporary injunction restraining defendants from constructing on open space of a Wakf property - The High Court held that since the property is Wakf and public, no construction should be permitted without proper authority - Held that the Tribunal's order was justified and no interference was warranted (Paras 1-5).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the Wakf Tribunal was justified in granting temporary injunction restraining the petitioners from constructing on a Wakf property.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The High Court dismissed the civil revision application, upholding the order of the Wakf Tribunal granting temporary injunction.

Law Points

  • Wakf property is public property
  • no construction permitted without permission
  • temporary injunction can be granted to prevent encroachment
  • prima facie case and balance of convenience in favor of plaintiffs
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2012 LawText (BOM) (09) 21

Civil Revision Application No. 172 of 2012

2012-09-07

A.V. Nirgude

Mr. Anand P. Bhandari for Petitioners, Mr. A.D. Kasliwal for Respondent Nos.1 to 5 and 7

Shaikh Aziza Parveen and Shaikh Hafeez

Mohd. Qusro, Mohd. Jameel, Mohd. Sharif, Mohd. Ismail, Mohd. Ashfaque, Mohd. Mushtaque, Maharashtra State Board of Wakfs

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Civil revision against order of temporary injunction in a Wakf suit.

Remedy Sought

Petitioners sought to set aside the temporary injunction order restraining construction on Wakf property.

Filing Reason

Petitioners challenged the order of the Wakf Tribunal granting temporary injunction against them.

Previous Decisions

Wakf Tribunal allowed respondents' application for temporary injunction on 28th May 2012.

Issues

Whether the Wakf Tribunal erred in granting temporary injunction without proper consideration of facts and law.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioners argued that they had been in possession and had a right to construct. Respondents argued that the property is Wakf and public, and construction would cause irreparable loss.

Ratio Decidendi

Wakf property is public property; no construction can be permitted without proper authority; temporary injunction is justified to prevent encroachment and protect public property.

Judgment Excerpts

It is common ground that property bearing City Survey No. 2543 at Aurangabad is a Wakf property. The learned Judge discussed the facts quite elaborately and held that since the suit plot and the open space behind Ashurkhana is a public property, no construction on the same should be permitted.

Procedural History

Respondents filed Wakf Suit No.54 of 2011 seeking injunction. Wakf Tribunal granted temporary injunction on 28th May 2012. Petitioners filed Civil Revision Application No.172 of 2012 in the High Court challenging that order. The High Court reserved judgment on 29th August 2012 and pronounced on 7th September 2012, dismissing the revision.

Acts & Sections

  • Wakf Act, 1995: 83, 85
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Employer's Challenge to Industrial Court Order Quashing Recovery of Excess Salary Paid Due to Employer's Mistake. Recovery of Rs.1,94,637/- from Retired Employee Set Aside as Employer's Inadvertence Cannot Be Visited on Em...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Mutation Entry in Land Revenue Records — Dispute Over Title Cannot Be Decided in Revenue Proceedings Under Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966.