Bombay High Court Allows Transfer of Hindu Marriage Petition from Ahmednagar to Beed on Grounds of Wife's Convenience and Hardship. Wife's inability to travel due to lack of male escort and financial dependence constitutes sufficient ground for transfer under Section 24 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: AURANGABAD In Favour of Accused
  • 3
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The applicant, Sau. Mangal w/o Ambadas Gaikwad, filed a Miscellaneous Civil Application under Section 24 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, seeking transfer of Hindu Marriage Petition No. 56 of 2012 pending before the 5th Joint Civil Judge, Senior Division, Ahmednagar, to the Court of Civil Judge, Senior Division, Beed. The applicant is the wife of respondent No.1, Ambadas Gaikwad, and respondent No.2 is Ravi Gaikwad. The marriage between the applicant and respondent No.1 was solemnized on 15th May 2009. After marriage, the applicant resided with her husband at Ahmednagar, but due to ill-treatment, she was forced to leave the matrimonial home and has been residing at Beed with her parents. The husband filed a petition for restitution of conjugal rights under Section 9 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, at Ahmednagar. The applicant contended that she is a housewife with no independent income, has no male family member to accompany her to Ahmednagar, and traveling alone is difficult and unsafe. She also submitted that she has filed a complaint under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005, at Beed. The respondent No.1 opposed the transfer, arguing that the petition was filed at Ahmednagar as per Section 19 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, and that the wife's parents reside at Beed, not the wife herself. The Court, after hearing both sides, held that the convenience of the wife must be given weight in matrimonial proceedings. The Court noted that the wife is a housewife, has no independent income, and has no male escort to accompany her to Ahmednagar. The Court also considered that the wife has filed a domestic violence case at Beed. Accordingly, the Court allowed the application and directed the transfer of the Hindu Marriage Petition from Ahmednagar to Beed. The Court made it clear that the trial court at Beed shall decide the petition on its own merits without being influenced by the observations in this order.

Headnote

A) Family Law - Transfer of Matrimonial Proceedings - Section 24 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 - Section 19 of Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 - Wife's Convenience - The wife sought transfer of a Hindu Marriage Petition filed by the husband at Ahmednagar to Beed, citing her residence at Beed, lack of male escort, financial dependence, and difficulty in traveling alone. The Court held that the wife's convenience must be given weight, and transfer was allowed to avoid hardship to the wife. (Paras 1-5)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether a Hindu Marriage Petition filed by the husband at Ahmednagar should be transferred to Beed at the instance of the wife on grounds of her inconvenience and hardship.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The application is allowed. Hindu Marriage Petition No.56 of 2012 pending before the 5th Joint Civil Judge, Senior Division, Ahmednagar is withdrawn and transferred to the Court of Civil Judge, Senior Division, Beed, for disposal in accordance with law. The trial court at Beed shall decide the petition on its own merits without being influenced by the observations in this order. Rule made absolute accordingly.

Law Points

  • Transfer of matrimonial proceedings
  • convenience of wife
  • hardship
  • Section 24 CPC
  • Section 19 of Hindu Marriage Act
  • 1955
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2012 LawText (BOM) (08) 4

Misc. Civil Application No.24 of 2012

2012-08-14

S.S. Shinde, J.

Mr. Milind M. Patil (Beedkar) for the applicant, Mr. N.B. Narwade for respondent No.1

Sau. Mangal w/o Ambadas Gaikwad

Ambadas s/o Kachru Gaikwad and Ravi s/o Subhash Gaikwad

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Application for transfer of a Hindu Marriage Petition from one court to another under Section 24 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.

Remedy Sought

Transfer of Hindu Marriage Petition No.56 of 2012 from the Court of 5th Joint Civil Judge, Senior Division, Ahmednagar to the Court of Civil Judge, Senior Division, Beed.

Filing Reason

The applicant wife claimed inconvenience and hardship in defending the petition at Ahmednagar due to lack of independent income, absence of male escort, and difficulty in traveling alone.

Issues

Whether the wife's inconvenience and hardship constitute sufficient grounds for transfer of the matrimonial petition under Section 24 CPC.

Submissions/Arguments

Applicant (wife): She is a housewife with no independent income, resides at Beed with parents, has no male family member to accompany her to Ahmednagar, traveling alone is difficult and unsafe, and she has filed a domestic violence case at Beed. Respondent (husband): The petition was filed at Ahmednagar as per Section 19 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, and the wife's parents reside at Beed, not the wife herself.

Ratio Decidendi

In matrimonial proceedings, the convenience of the wife must be given weight. A wife who is a housewife with no independent income and no male escort to accompany her to a distant court faces hardship, which is a valid ground for transfer under Section 24 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.

Judgment Excerpts

Heard finally with consent of the parties. This application is filed seeking transfer of Hindu Marriage Petition No.56 of 2012 pending on the file of the Court of 5th Joint Civil Judge, Senior Division, Ahmednagar to the Court of Civil Judge, Senior Division, Beed. The applicant is a housewife and has no independent income. She has no male member to accompany her to Ahmednagar. It is difficult for her to travel alone. In the matters of transfer of matrimonial proceedings, the convenience of the wife has to be given weight. In the result, the application is allowed.

Procedural History

The applicant wife filed Misc. Civil Application No.24 of 2012 under Section 24 CPC seeking transfer of Hindu Marriage Petition No.56 of 2012 from Ahmednagar to Beed. The application was heard finally with consent of parties and disposed of on 14th August 2012.

Acts & Sections

  • Code of Civil Procedure, 1908: Section 24
  • Hindu Marriage Act, 1955: Section 9, Section 19
  • Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005:
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Transfer of Hindu Marriage Petition from Ahmednagar to Beed on Grounds of Wife's Convenience and Hardship. Wife's inability to travel due to lack of male escort and financial dependence constitutes sufficient ground for trans...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Appellant in Rape of Minor Case Under POCSO Act — Seven-Year RI Maintained. Testimony of Prosecutrix Found Credible and Corroborated by Medical Evidence and Prompt FIR.