Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Murder Based on Dying Declaration. Dying declaration recorded by police officer held admissible under Section 32(1) of Indian Evidence Act, 1872 as deceased was in a fit state of mind.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY In Favour of Prosecution
  • 52
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The appellant, Vasant Ramchandra Gaikwad, was convicted under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 for the murder of John Lazoras and sentenced to life imprisonment. The prosecution case was that on 20th July 1986, PW-1 Sarvesh Jaising Chavan and another person found the deceased lying injured in a shop. They informed the police, and Investigating Officer Firoz Sorabji Ganjia (PW-3) recorded the statement of the deceased at Cooper Hospital after obtaining permission from Dr. Tillu. In that statement, the deceased named the appellant and another accused (since deceased) as the persons who assaulted him with a sword and sickle. The trial court convicted the appellant based on this dying declaration and other evidence. The appellant challenged the conviction on the ground that the dying declaration was not reliable as it was recorded by a police officer and there was no independent witness. The High Court examined the evidence and found that the doctor had certified the deceased was conscious and fit to give a statement. The dying declaration was recorded in Hindi and read over to the deceased, who thumb-marked it. The court held that the dying declaration was voluntary, truthful, and consistent with the medical evidence. The court also noted that the appellant had a motive and was seen near the scene. The appeal was dismissed, and the conviction and sentence were upheld.

Headnote

A) Criminal Law - Dying Declaration - Admissibility - Section 32(1) Indian Evidence Act, 1872 - Dying declaration recorded by police officer is admissible if deceased was in a fit state of mind - Court held that the dying declaration was voluntary, truthful, and recorded after certification of fitness by doctor - Conviction based solely on dying declaration is sustainable if it inspires confidence (Paras 1-11).

B) Criminal Law - Murder - Section 302 Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Conviction based on dying declaration - Court upheld life imprisonment where deceased named appellant as assailant in dying declaration and medical evidence corroborated injuries - Held that absence of independent witnesses does not vitiate conviction if dying declaration is reliable (Paras 1-11).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the dying declaration recorded by the Investigating Officer is reliable and can form the sole basis for conviction under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

Appeal dismissed. Conviction and sentence of life imprisonment under Section 302 IPC upheld.

Law Points

  • Dying declaration
  • Admissibility of dying declaration
  • Section 32(1) Indian Evidence Act
  • 1872
  • Conviction on dying declaration
  • Corroboration of dying declaration
  • Murder under Section 302 IPC
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2012 LawText (BOM) (07) 84

Criminal Appeal No.1263 of 2006

2012-07-03

V. M. Kanade, P. D. Kode

Mr. P.P. Runwal for the Appellant, Mr. J.P. Yagnik, APP for the State

Vasant Ramchandra Gaikwad

The State (At the instance of Sahar Air Port Police Station in C.R. No. 340/86, C.C. No. 1237/P/87)

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal appeal against conviction for murder under Section 302 IPC.

Remedy Sought

Appellant sought acquittal from conviction and sentence of life imprisonment.

Filing Reason

Appellant challenged the judgment and order of the Additional Sessions Judge, Greater Bombay dated 28th November 2006 convicting him under Section 302 IPC.

Previous Decisions

Trial court convicted appellant under Section 302 IPC and sentenced to life imprisonment; acquitted under Section 452 IPC, Section 25 r/w 27 Arms Act, and Section 135 Bombay Police Act.

Issues

Whether the dying declaration recorded by the Investigating Officer is reliable and admissible under Section 32(1) of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872. Whether the conviction under Section 302 IPC can be sustained solely on the basis of the dying declaration.

Submissions/Arguments

Appellant argued that the dying declaration was not reliable as it was recorded by a police officer and there was no independent witness. State argued that the dying declaration was recorded after the doctor certified the deceased was conscious and fit, and it was voluntary and truthful.

Ratio Decidendi

A dying declaration recorded by a police officer is admissible under Section 32(1) of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 if the deceased was in a fit state of mind at the time of making the statement. Such a declaration can form the sole basis for conviction if it is voluntary, truthful, and inspires confidence.

Judgment Excerpts

The Appellant–Original Accused no. 2 has filed this appeal challenging the Judgment and Order passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Greater Bombay dated 28th November, 2006. Brief facts are as under : The prosecution case in brief is that on 20th July, 1986, PW.1 Sarvesh Jaising Chavan and one other person Silvestor James Peter found one John Lazoras lying in an injured condition in a shop known as R.G. Patel Stores situated in Bamanwada area at Vile Parle.

Procedural History

The appellant was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Greater Bombay on 28th November 2006 under Section 302 IPC and sentenced to life imprisonment. He filed Criminal Appeal No.1263 of 2006 before the Bombay High Court challenging the conviction and sentence.

Acts & Sections

  • Indian Penal Code, 1860: 302, 452
  • Indian Evidence Act, 1872: 32(1)
  • Arms Act, 1959: 25, 27
  • Bombay Police Act, 1951: 135
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Murder Based on Dying Declaration. Dying declaration recorded by police officer held admissible under Section 32(1) of Indian Evidence Act, 1872 as deceased was in a fit state of mind.
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Parole to Prisoner for Grandmother's Death Rituals Under Rule 19 of Prisons (Bombay Furlough and Parole) Rules, 1959. The Court held that 'near relative' includes grandmother for parole purposes.