Bombay High Court Directs Land Acquisition Compensation for Famine Relief Works - Mandamus Issued for Formal Acquisition and Payment Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894. Petitioners' lands taken in 2001 for percolation tank; court orders either acquisition with compensation or return of possession.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: AURANGABAD
  • 2
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioners, owners of lands bearing Gut Nos. 90, 91/2/2/1B, 77/7 and 77/8, alleged that their lands were taken possession of in 2001 by the respondents for construction of a percolation water tank as a famine relief work. Despite several representations, no formal acquisition proceedings were initiated and no compensation was paid. The petitioners sought a writ of mandamus directing the respondents to pass an award and pay compensation. The respondents contended that possession was taken under Section 17 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, but no award was passed. The court noted that possession had been taken and a tank constructed, but the respondents had not completed acquisition. The court held that the respondents cannot retain possession indefinitely without paying compensation. It directed the respondents to either complete acquisition proceedings and pass an award within six months, or return possession to the petitioners. The court also directed that if acquisition is completed, compensation be paid with interest from the date of possession. The writ petition was disposed of with these directions.

Headnote

A) Land Acquisition - Compensation - Mandamus - Land Acquisition Act, 1894, Sections 11, 16, 17, 48 - Petitioners' lands were taken possession of in 2001 for construction of a percolation water tank as famine relief work, but no formal acquisition or award was made - Court held that the respondents cannot retain possession without paying compensation and directed them to either complete acquisition proceedings within six months or return possession - Held that the petitioners are entitled to compensation for the period of possession (Paras 1-10).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the petitioners are entitled to a writ of mandamus directing the respondents to pass an award and pay compensation for the lands taken possession of in 2001 for construction of a percolation water tank.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The court directed the respondents to either complete acquisition proceedings and pass an award within six months from the date of the order, or return possession of the lands to the petitioners. If acquisition is completed, compensation shall be paid with interest from the date of possession. The writ petition was disposed of accordingly.

Law Points

  • Mandamus
  • Land Acquisition
  • Compensation
  • Possession
  • Famine Relief
  • Section 11
  • Section 16
  • Section 17
  • Section 48
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2012 LawText (BOM) (02) 11

Writ Petition No. 1290 of 2009

2012-02-23

D.G. Karnik, S.B. Deshmukh

Mr. Ajit B. Kale for petitioners, Mr. V.B. Ghatge for respondent nos.1 to 3, Smt. Chaitali Kutti for respondent no.4

Prakash s/o. Chindha Kadam and others

State of Maharashtra and others

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition seeking mandamus for land acquisition compensation

Remedy Sought

Petitioners seek direction to respondents to pass award and pay compensation for lands taken possession of in 2001

Filing Reason

Respondents took possession of petitioners' lands in 2001 for construction of percolation water tank but did not complete acquisition or pay compensation

Issues

Whether the respondents can retain possession of the petitioners' lands without paying compensation? Whether a writ of mandamus can be issued directing the respondents to complete acquisition proceedings and pay compensation?

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioners: Lands were taken possession of in 2001, but no award or compensation has been paid despite representations. Respondents: Possession was taken under Section 17 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, but no award has been passed yet.

Ratio Decidendi

The respondents cannot retain possession of land without paying compensation. If acquisition is not completed, possession must be returned. The court can issue mandamus to compel compliance with the Land Acquisition Act.

Judgment Excerpts

The petitioners claim to be owners of the lands bearing Gut Nos. 90, 91/2/2/1B, 77/7 and 77/8. Grievance of the petitioners is that despite several representations to formally acquire their lands and pay them compensation, award has not been passed and compensation has not been paid.

Procedural History

The petitioners filed Writ Petition No. 1290 of 2009 before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, seeking a mandamus for land acquisition compensation. The court heard the matter on 23rd February 2012 and disposed it with directions.

Acts & Sections

  • Land Acquisition Act, 1894: Section 11, Section 16, Section 17, Section 48
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order for Detenu Already in Jail — Subjective Satisfaction Vitiated. Detention under Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities Act, 1981 set aside as detaining authority failed to consider necessi...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Directs Land Acquisition Compensation for Famine Relief Works - Mandamus Issued for Formal Acquisition and Payment Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894. Petitioners' lands taken in 2001 for percolation tank; court orders either acquisit...