Bombay High Court Allows DNB Trainees' Petitions Against NBE Communication Denying Registration for July 2010 Session. Court Holds That NBE's Communication Was Arbitrary and Violative of Principles of Natural Justice as It Was Issued Without Prior Notice or Opportunity of Hearing.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY In Favour of Accused
  • 151
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The judgment concerns a batch of nine writ petitions filed by doctors challenging a communication dated 14 June 2011 issued by the National Board of Examination (NBE). The communication held that the petitioners could not be considered for registration as DNB trainees for the session commencing from July 2010 in the specialties of Radiology, ENT, and Paediatrics. The petitioners had applied for DNB training and were initially granted provisional registration. However, the NBE later issued the impugned communication denying registration without any prior notice or opportunity of hearing. The court considered whether the communication was arbitrary and violative of principles of natural justice. The court held that the communication was arbitrary and violative of principles of natural justice as it adversely affected the petitioners' rights without affording them a hearing. The court allowed the petitions and quashed the communication dated 14 June 2011, directing the NBE to consider the petitioners' cases afresh after giving them an opportunity of hearing.

Headnote

A) Administrative Law - Principles of Natural Justice - Denial of Registration - Communication dated 14 June 2011 by National Board of Examination (NBE) - Petitioners were doctors who had applied for DNB training and were initially granted provisional registration; later NBE issued communication denying registration without prior notice or opportunity of hearing - Held that the communication was arbitrary and violative of principles of natural justice as it adversely affected the petitioners' rights without affording them a hearing (Paras 2-5).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the communication dated 14 June 2011 issued by the National Board of Examination denying registration to the petitioners as DNB trainees for the July 2010 session was arbitrary and violative of principles of natural justice.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The court allowed the petitions and quashed the communication dated 14 June 2011, directing the National Board of Examination to consider the petitioners' cases afresh after giving them an opportunity of hearing.

Law Points

  • Principles of natural justice
  • Arbitrariness
  • Legitimate expectation
  • Right to hearing
  • Administrative law
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2011 LawText (BOM) (11) 75

Writ Petition No. 2141 of 2011 and connected matters

2011-11-28

Dr. D.Y. Chandrachud, A.A. Sayed

Mr. V.M. Thorat, Ms. Pooja V. Thorat, Mr. Dinesh Tripathi, Mr. Rajinder Kumar, Mr. V.P. Sawant, Mr. M.S. Bhardwaj, Mr. E.P. Bharucha, Mr. Nikhil Agrawal

Dr. Nilesh Balwant Gourshettiwar and others

Union of India and others

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petitions challenging a communication by the National Board of Examination denying registration as DNB trainees.

Remedy Sought

Quashing of the communication dated 14 June 2011 and direction to consider the petitioners for registration.

Filing Reason

The petitioners were denied registration as DNB trainees for the July 2010 session without prior notice or hearing.

Issues

Whether the communication dated 14 June 2011 was arbitrary and violative of principles of natural justice.

Submissions/Arguments

The petitioners argued that the communication was issued without any prior notice or opportunity of hearing, violating principles of natural justice.

Ratio Decidendi

A communication that adversely affects the rights of individuals without affording them a prior hearing is arbitrary and violative of principles of natural justice.

Judgment Excerpts

This Judgment would govern a batch of nine Petitions, all of them filed by Doctors who seek to challenge a communication issued by the National Board of Examination on 14 June 2011 holding that they could not be considered for registration as DNB trainees for the session commencing from July 2010 in the specialties of Radiology, ENT and Paediatrics.

Procedural History

The petitions were filed in 2011 challenging the communication dated 14 June 2011. The court took up the petitions for hearing and final disposal with consent of counsel.

Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Tribunals NCLAT Allows Appeal Against Rejection of Claim by RP in CIRP of Sovereign Industries Ltd. — Claimant's Right to File Claim Before Adjudicating Authority Not Barred by Limitation Under IBC. The NCLAT held that acknowledgment of debt in balance sheet...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Petitions Challenging Exhumation Order in Murder Investigation — Court Holds That Exhumation Under Section 176 CrPC Read With Section 174 CrPC Is Permissible When Prima Facie Evidence of Unnatural Death Exists and...