High Court Sets Aside Income Tax Intimation Due to Lack of Verification. The court found that the revised intimation was issued without proper verification of tax deducted at source, necessitating further investigation.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY In Favour of Accused
  • 6
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The dispute arose from the petitioner's income tax assessment for the Assessment Year 2006-07. The petitioner, a Judicial Officer, filed a return showing a total income of Rs.1,79,664 and claimed a refund of Rs.16,615. However, the Assessing Officer issued an intimation reflecting a lower income of Rs.1,42,540 and did not credit the tax deducted at source of Rs.17,500, leading to a demand of Rs.4,339. The petitioner sought rectification, asserting that the income was incorrectly computed and the tax deducted at source was not considered. The Assessing Officer later issued a revised intimation, again not crediting the tax deducted at source, resulting in a total demand of Rs.8,219. The petitioner, through a query under the Right to Information Act, confirmed that the tax had indeed been deducted. The court noted that the law prohibits recovery of tax from the person whose income was subjected to tax deduction at source. The court found the revised intimation to be invalid due to lack of verification and directed the Assessing Officer to verify the tax deduction and grant appropriate credit. The petition was disposed of accordingly, with appreciation for the assistance of the amicus curiae.

Headnote

A) Income Tax - Tax Deducted at Source - Recovery from Assessee - Income Tax Act, 1961, Section 154 - The court held that the revised intimation issued by the Income Tax Officer was without verification of facts regarding tax deducted at source from the petitioner's salary, thus setting it aside and directing further verification and credit for tax if applicable. (Paras 3-5).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the revised intimation issued by the Income Tax Officer was valid given the lack of verification of tax deducted at source.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The court set aside the revised intimation issued on 24 January 2007, directing the Assessing Officer to verify the tax deducted at source and grant appropriate credit if applicable.

Law Points

  • Income Tax
  • Tax Deducted at Source
  • Rectification of Assessment
  • Right to Information Act
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2011 LawText (BOM) (10) 40

Writ Petition No. 6861 of 2011

2011-10-05

DR.D.Y.CHANDRACHUD, A. A. SAYED

Mr.N.G.Vaze, Mr.S.K.Bhatnagar, Mr.N.R.Prajapati, Mr.Jamshed D.Mistri

Shri Naresh Govind Vaze

The Income Tax Officer, Ward IV & Ors.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition challenging income tax assessment and demand.

Remedy Sought

Petitioner sought to set aside the revised intimation and obtain credit for tax deducted at source.

Filing Reason

Dispute over incorrect income assessment and tax credit.

Issues

Validity of revised intimation issued by the Income Tax Officer Verification of tax deducted at source

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued that the tax deducted at source was not credited, leading to erroneous demand. Respondents maintained the validity of the assessment despite the petitioner's claims.

Ratio Decidendi

The court emphasized the necessity of verifying tax deductions at source before issuing demands, aligning with the legal principle that prohibits recovery from the income earner when tax has been deducted.

Judgment Excerpts

The revised intimation issued on 24 January 2007 by the Income Tax Officer is without verification of the facts and should be set aside. We direct that the Assessing Officer shall duly verify as to whether as a matter of fact, the tax was deducted at source from the salary of the Petitioner.

Procedural History

The petitioner filed a writ petition challenging the income tax assessment, followed by hearings where the court requested assistance from an amicus curiae.

Acts & Sections

  • Income Tax Act, 1961: Section 143, Section 154
  • Right to Information Act, 2005:
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal in Possession Suit — Exchange of Land Not Proved by Registered Instrument. Transfer of Property Act, 1882 Section 54 requires immovable property of value Rs.100 and above to be transferred only by registered i...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Caste Scrutiny Committee's Invalidity Order for Scheduled Tribe Certificate. Court holds that the Scrutiny Committee must consider the affinity test and other relevant material before declaring a cas...