Bombay High Court Sets Aside Police Commissioner's Order for Violation of Natural Justice in Bar License Matter. Failure to Furnish Documents in Show Cause Notice Renders Order Vitiated.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: GOA In Favour of Accused
  • 12
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Smt. Renuka w/o Mohan Patel, proprietor of Payal Bar and Restaurant in Nagpur, challenged an order passed by the Commissioner of Police, Nagpur (respondent no.2). The impugned order was based on a show cause notice issued to the petitioner, but the copies of documents relied upon in the notice were not furnished to her. The petitioner contended that despite an order dated 6/12/2010 by the Commissioner directing that the documents be supplied, they were not provided, thereby preventing her from effectively responding to the show cause notice. The court observed that the failure to furnish documents resulted in a violation of principles of natural justice, vitiating the impugned order. The learned Additional Government Pleader, Smt. B.H. Dangre, fairly conceded that the order could be set aside and the matter remanded for fresh consideration, with an undertaking that the documents would be supplied within four weeks. Consequently, the court set aside the impugned order, remanded the matter to the Commissioner of Police for de novo consideration, directed the Commissioner to furnish the documents to the petitioner within four weeks, and to decide the matter within eight weeks thereafter. Rule was made absolute with no order as to costs.

Headnote

A) Administrative Law - Principles of Natural Justice - Right to Fair Hearing - Show Cause Notice - Failure to Furnish Documents - The Commissioner of Police passed an order against the petitioner without supplying copies of documents on which the show cause notice was based, despite an earlier direction to furnish them. The court held that this prevented the petitioner from effectively responding, violating natural justice. The order was set aside and the matter remanded for de novo consideration with a direction to supply documents within four weeks and decide within eight weeks thereafter. (Paras 2-4)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether an order passed without furnishing copies of documents relied upon in a show cause notice is vitiated for violation of principles of natural justice.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The impugned order is set aside. The matter is remanded back to the Commissioner of Police for de novo consideration. The Commissioner is directed to furnish the documents to the petitioner within four weeks and decide the matter within eight weeks thereafter. Rule made absolute. No order as to costs.

Law Points

  • Principles of natural justice
  • Right to fair hearing
  • Duty to furnish documents
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2011 LawText (BOM) (06) 105

Writ Petition No.451 of 2011

2011-06-16

R.M. Savant

Shri S.G. Jagtap for petitioner, Smt. B.H. Dangre for respondents

Smt. Renuka w/o Mohan Patel (Hiranwar)

The State of Maharashtra, Commissioner of Police (Urban), Nagpur

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition challenging an order of the Commissioner of Police on grounds of violation of natural justice.

Remedy Sought

Setting aside of the impugned order and direction to furnish documents.

Filing Reason

The Commissioner of Police passed an order without furnishing copies of documents on which the show cause notice was based, despite an earlier direction to supply them.

Previous Decisions

An order dated 6/12/2010 by the Commissioner of Police directed that documents be furnished to the petitioner, but they were not supplied.

Issues

Whether the impugned order is vitiated for violation of principles of natural justice due to non-furnishing of documents.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner: The documents on which the show cause notice was based were not furnished, despite an order dated 6/12/2010 directing their supply, preventing effective response. Respondent: The Additional Government Pleader fairly conceded that the order may be set aside and matter remanded for de novo consideration, with an undertaking to supply documents within four weeks.

Ratio Decidendi

An order passed without furnishing copies of documents relied upon in a show cause notice violates principles of natural justice as it prevents the affected party from effectively responding, thereby vitiating the order.

Judgment Excerpts

The order impugned in the present petition has been passed by the respondent no.2 Commissioner of Police without furnishing copies of documents on the basis of which show cause notice was issued to the petitioner. This has resulted in petitioner not being able to effectively deal with the show cause notice and ultimately the order being vitiated on account of violation of principles of natural justice.

Procedural History

The petitioner filed a writ petition challenging an order of the Commissioner of Police. The court heard the matter and passed the judgment on 16 June 2011.

Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Upholds Disqualification of MLA for Anti-Party Voting Under Tenth Schedule. Speaker's Order Disqualifying Petitioner for Voluntarily Giving Up Party Membership and Voting Contrary to Whip Upheld as Valid.
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Sets Aside Police Commissioner's Order for Violation of Natural Justice in Bar License Matter. Failure to Furnish Documents in Show Cause Notice Renders Order Vitiated.