Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal of Teacher Challenging Termination During Probation - Probationary Appointment Confers No Right to Post, Termination Valid.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY In Favour of Prosecution
  • 13
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The appellant, Shri Kodandpani R. Kulkarni, was selected as an Assistant Teacher in the respondent-institute at Vishnu Nagar Branch. He was appointed on probation. By an order dated 26th March 1998, his services were terminated on the last working day of the academic year 1997-98. The appellant challenged the termination before the School Tribunal, Navi Mumbai, which allowed his appeal and ordered reinstatement. The respondent-Management challenged the Tribunal's order by way of a writ petition before the Bombay High Court. The learned Single Judge allowed the writ petition, setting aside the Tribunal's order on the ground that since the appellant was appointed on probation and his services were terminated during the probation period, he had no right to the post. The appellant then filed a Letters Patent Appeal before the Division Bench. The Division Bench heard both sides and examined the orders of the School Tribunal and the learned Single Judge. The Court noted that the appellant was selected on 1st June 1996 and worked from 13th June 1996 to 30th April 1997 and from 12th June 1997 to 30th April 1998. The termination order dated 26th March 1998 did not mention that the appellant was appointed on probation. However, the Court found that the appellant was appointed on probation and his services were terminated during the probation period. The Court held that a probationer has no right to the post and the termination during probation is valid. The Division Bench dismissed the appeal, upholding the order of the learned Single Judge.

Headnote

A) Service Law - Probationary Appointment - Right to Post - A teacher appointed on probation has no right to the post during the probation period. The termination of services during the probation period is valid and does not require any inquiry. (Paras 1-3)

B) Education Law - Termination of Services - School Tribunal - The School Tribunal's order of reinstatement was set aside by the High Court on the ground that the appellant was appointed on probation and his services were terminated during the probation period. (Paras 1-3)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether a teacher appointed on probation has a right to the post and whether termination during the probation period is valid.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

Appeal dismissed. Order of learned Single Judge upheld. No order as to costs.

Law Points

  • Probationary appointment does not confer right to post
  • Termination during probation period is valid
  • School Tribunal's order of reinstatement set aside
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2011 LawText (BOM) (06) 71

Letters Patent Appeal No. 342 of 2002 in Writ Petition No. 4683 of 2001

2011-06-07

P.B. Majmudar, A.A. Sayed

Mr. A.A. Garge for the Appellant, Mr. G.R. Rege i/by Shri S.M. Railkar for Respondent Nos. 1 and 2, Mr. A.I. Patel, AGP for Respondent No.3

Shri Kodandpani R. Kulkarni

The Headmistress, Sister Nivedita English Medium School, The Secretary, The Dombivali Shikshan Prasarak Mandal, The Education Officer, Zilla Parishad, Thane

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Appeal against order of learned Single Judge setting aside School Tribunal's order of reinstatement of teacher.

Remedy Sought

Appellant sought reinstatement and setting aside of termination order.

Filing Reason

Termination of services of appellant as Assistant Teacher on 26th March 1998.

Previous Decisions

School Tribunal allowed appeal and ordered reinstatement; learned Single Judge set aside Tribunal's order.

Issues

Whether the appellant was appointed on probation and had no right to the post. Whether termination during probation period is valid.

Submissions/Arguments

Appellant argued he was appointed on clear vacancy after proper procedure and learned Single Judge made out a new case of probation. Respondent argued appellant was appointed on temporary basis and termination at end of academic term was legal.

Ratio Decidendi

A teacher appointed on probation has no right to the post during the probation period. Termination of services during the probation period is valid and does not require any inquiry.

Judgment Excerpts

The learned Single Judge by the impugned order dated 25th June, 2002 allowed the writ petition by setting aside the order of the School Tribunal by holding that since the appellant was appointed on probation and since his services were terminated during the probation period, he has no right to the post.

Procedural History

Appellant appointed as Assistant Teacher on 1.6.1996. Services terminated on 26.3.1998. Appellant filed appeal before School Tribunal which allowed appeal and ordered reinstatement. Respondent-Management filed writ petition before High Court. Learned Single Judge allowed writ petition setting aside Tribunal's order. Appellant filed Letters Patent Appeal before Division Bench.

Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Eviction of Unauthorised Occupant from Railway Land. Section 5A of the Public Premises (Eviction of Unauthorised Occupants) Act, 1971 applies to pre-existing unauthorised constructions as it is procedu...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Father's Appeal for Custody of Minor Children in Guardianship Dispute. Welfare of Minor Children is Paramount Consideration Under Section 7 of Guardian and Wards Act, 1890.