Bombay High Court Quashes FIR in Cheating and Criminal Breach of Trust Case Due to Civil Nature of Dispute. Dispute Arising from Business Transaction Does Not Attract Sections 406 and 420 IPC When Ingredients Are Not Made Out.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY In Favour of Accused
  • 175
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Jitendra Nathmal Joshi @ Sharma, filed a criminal writ petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 seeking quashing of First Information Report No.7/2011 dated 07.01.2011 registered at CBD Belapur Police Station for offences under Sections 406 and 420 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860. The petitioner was engaged in import-export business under the name 'Path International'. He knew Vishnu Joshi, a chartered accountant and husband of the second respondent, Seema Joshi. Vishnu Joshi approached the petitioner in December 2009 with a business proposal, leading to financial dealings between them. Disputes arose, and Vishnu Joshi allegedly threatened the petitioner and demanded Rs.15 lakhs. With the help of a police officer, Nitin Patil, the petitioner's signatures were obtained on papers without reading, and two cheques of Rs.7,50,000 each were taken in favor of the second respondent. The petitioner stopped payment of those cheques, and thereafter, Vishnu Joshi and his wife registered the FIR against the petitioner. The petitioner contended that the FIR was false and based on a concocted story. The court heard arguments from all parties. The court examined the allegations in the FIR and found that the dispute was essentially of a civil nature arising from business dealings. The essential ingredients of criminal breach of trust (entrustment, dishonest misappropriation) and cheating (deception from the inception) were not made out. The court held that continuing criminal proceedings would be an abuse of the process of law. Consequently, the court allowed the petition and quashed the FIR.

Headnote

A) Criminal Procedure Code - Quashing of FIR - Section 482 CrPC - Civil Disguised as Criminal - The court examined whether the FIR alleging criminal breach of trust and cheating was maintainable when the dispute arose from a business transaction and was essentially civil in nature. Held that where the allegations in the FIR do not disclose the essential ingredients of the offences and the dispute is purely civil, the criminal proceedings amount to an abuse of the process of law and are liable to be quashed (Paras 1-10).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether an FIR alleging offences under Sections 406 and 420 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 can be quashed when the dispute is essentially of a civil nature.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The petition is allowed. FIR No.7/2011 dated 07.01.2011 registered at CBD Belapur Police Station for offences under Sections 406 and 420 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 is quashed.

Law Points

  • Quashing of FIR
  • Civil dispute
  • Criminal breach of trust
  • Cheating
  • Section 482 CrPC
  • Abuse of process of law
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2011 LawText (BOM) (06) 62

Criminal Writ Petition No.1054 of 2011

2011-06-09

B.H. Marlapalle, A.M. Thipsay

P.C.N. Agarwal for Petitioner, A.S. Pai (APP) for Respondent No.1, Navin S. Joshi for Respondent No.2

Jitendra Nathmal Joshi @ Sharma

The State of Maharashtra and Mrs. Seema Vishnu Joshi

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal writ petition under Section 482 CrPC for quashing of FIR

Remedy Sought

Quashing of FIR No.7/2011 dated 07.01.2011 registered at CBD Belapur Police Station for offences under Sections 406 and 420 IPC

Filing Reason

Petitioner alleged that the FIR was false and based on a concocted story arising from a civil business dispute

Issues

Whether the FIR discloses essential ingredients of offences under Sections 406 and 420 IPC? Whether the dispute is essentially civil in nature and criminal proceedings amount to abuse of process?

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued that the FIR was false and based on a concocted story, and the dispute was civil in nature. Respondents argued that the FIR disclosed cognizable offences and should be investigated.

Ratio Decidendi

Where the allegations in the FIR do not disclose the essential ingredients of criminal breach of trust or cheating and the dispute is essentially of a civil nature, continuing criminal proceedings would be an abuse of the process of law, and the FIR is liable to be quashed under Section 482 CrPC.

Judgment Excerpts

By this petition, the Petitioner prays that the First Information Report bearing No.7/2011 dated 07.01.2011 registered at the CBD Belapur Police Station against the Petitioner in respect of the offences punishable under Sections 406 and 420 of the Indian Penal Code be quashed.

Procedural History

The petitioner filed Criminal Writ Petition No.1054 of 2011 under Section 482 CrPC seeking quashing of FIR. The court added the first informant as Respondent No.2. After hearing arguments, the court reserved judgment on 29th April 2011 and pronounced on 9th June 2011.

Acts & Sections

  • Indian Penal Code, 1860: 406, 420
  • Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973: 482
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Upholds Appellant in Partnership Act Case on Implied Duration and Managing Agency Termination. Partnership Not at Will Due to Rotation and Heirs Clause, but Mills' Termination of Agency Deemed Legal Absent Fraud or Collusion Under India...
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Upholds Company Law Board Order Directing Registration of Shares Under Companies Act, 1956 — Directors' Refusal to Transfer Shares Found Arbitrary and Mala Fide. Fiduciary Duty of Directors to Act Bona Fide in General Interest of Comp...