Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petitions Challenging Transfer Orders in Public Health Department — Transfer Orders Quashed for Non-Compliance with Government Resolution and Lack of Reasoned Consideration. Transfer of Taluka Health Officers Set Aside as Policy Mandating Consideration of Objections Was Ignored.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: AURANGABAD In Favour of Accused
  • 5
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioners, Suresh Vishwanath Gholap and Sunil Vitthalrao Borade, were serving as Taluka Health Officers in the Public Health Department of Maharashtra. They were transferred by orders dated 30-06-2011 and 01-07-2011 respectively, without following the procedure prescribed in the Government Resolution dated 15-06-2007. The Government Resolution required that transfer orders be issued after considering objections and providing reasons. The petitioners challenged the transfer orders by filing writ petitions before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. The court examined the Government Resolution and found that the transfer orders were passed mechanically without any application of mind. The respondents did not consider the petitioners' representations or provide any opportunity of hearing. The court held that the transfer orders were in violation of the Government Resolution and principles of natural justice. Consequently, the court quashed the impugned transfer orders and directed the respondents to pass fresh orders in accordance with law, after giving due opportunity to the petitioners. The writ petitions were allowed with no order as to costs.

Headnote

A) Service Law - Transfer - Government Resolution dated 15-06-2007 - Compliance - Transfer orders must be issued in accordance with the policy laid down in the Government Resolution, which requires consideration of objections and reasons for transfer - Held that the impugned transfer orders were passed without following the mandatory procedure under the Government Resolution, hence unsustainable (Paras 5-8).

B) Service Law - Natural Justice - Opportunity of Hearing - Transfer - Even in administrative transfers, if the policy provides for consideration of objections, failure to give opportunity vitiates the order - Held that the petitioners were not given any opportunity to object, and their representations were not considered, violating principles of natural justice (Paras 6-7).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the transfer orders of the petitioners were validly issued in compliance with the Government Resolution dated 15-06-2007 and principles of natural justice

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The writ petitions are allowed. The impugned transfer orders are quashed and set aside. The respondents are directed to pass fresh orders in accordance with law, after giving due opportunity to the petitioners. No order as to costs.

Law Points

  • Transfer orders must comply with Government Resolution dated 15-06-2007
  • reasoned consideration of objections
  • opportunity of hearing
  • adherence to transfer policy
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2011 LawText (BOM) (04) 11

Writ Petition No. 2585 of 2011 and Writ Petition No. 2586 of 2011

0000-00-00

Suresh s/o Vishwanath Gholap and Sunil s/o Vitthalrao Borade

State of Maharashtra, Director General of Health Services, Deputy Director of Health Services, Chief Executive Officer Zilla Parishad Ahmednagar, Mohan s/o Popatrao Shinde

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petitions challenging transfer orders of Taluka Health Officers

Remedy Sought

Quashing of transfer orders dated 30-06-2011 and 01-07-2011

Filing Reason

Transfer orders were issued without following the procedure under Government Resolution dated 15-06-2007 and without giving opportunity of hearing

Issues

Whether the transfer orders were issued in compliance with Government Resolution dated 15-06-2007 Whether the petitioners were given an opportunity of hearing before the transfer orders

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioners argued that the transfer orders were passed without following the mandatory procedure under the Government Resolution dated 15-06-2007 Respondents contended that the transfers were administrative and did not require prior hearing

Ratio Decidendi

Transfer orders must comply with the policy laid down in Government Resolution dated 15-06-2007, which requires consideration of objections and reasons for transfer. Failure to follow the procedure and give opportunity of hearing renders the transfer orders invalid.

Judgment Excerpts

The impugned transfer orders have been passed without following the procedure prescribed under the Government Resolution dated 15-06-2007. The petitioners were not given any opportunity to object to the transfer and their representations were not considered.

Procedural History

The petitioners filed writ petitions before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging their transfer orders. The court heard the matter and delivered judgment allowing the petitions.

Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petitions Challenging Transfer Orders in Public Health Department — Transfer Orders Quashed for Non-Compliance with Government Resolution and Lack of Reasoned Consideration. Transfer of Taluka Health Officers Set Aside...
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Restores Conviction in High-Profile Bihar Political Murder Case. The Supreme Court restores the trial court’s conviction of Mantu Tiwari and Vijay Kumar Shukla for the murder of Brij Bihari Prasad, rejecting the Patna High Court's ac...