Bombay High Court Allows Transfer of Civil Suit from Latur to Nagpur on Grounds of Convenience and Hardship to Widow Defendant. The Court held that the balance of convenience favored the defendant, a widow and sole earning member, who would face extreme difficulty in traveling over 600 km to attend court, while the plaintiff could attend court at Nagpur without comparable hardship.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: NAGPUR In Favour of Accused
  • 3
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The applicant, Smt. Rekha Raut, the widow of late Avinash Raut and original defendant in Special Civil Suit No.166 of 2009, filed a Misc. Civil Application under Section 24 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, seeking transfer of the suit from the Court of 3rd Joint Civil Judge, Senior Division, Latur, to a competent court at Nagpur. The suit was filed by the non-applicant, Shivaji Bhimrao Sapate, for recovery of Rs.3,96,000/- with interest, allegedly advanced as a loan to the applicant's husband on 30-10-2007. The loan was supported by four cheques which were dishonoured. The husband died on 4-3-2008, leading to the suit against the applicant as his legal heir. The applicant contended that she resides in Nagpur, works as a Technician in Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation (MSRTC) at Nagpur, and has two school-going children. She argued that traveling over 600 km to Latur for each hearing would cause extreme hardship, affecting her job and her children's education. The non-applicant opposed the transfer, claiming that the cause of action arose in Latur and that the applicant had previously attended court there. The Court, after considering the submissions, found that the balance of convenience was in favor of the applicant. The Court noted that the non-applicant, being a resident of Latur, could attend court at Nagpur without the same level of hardship. The Court allowed the application, directing the transfer of Special Civil Suit No.166 of 2009 from Latur to the competent court at Nagpur. The Court also directed that the non-applicant be at liberty to file an application for reimbursement of expenses incurred due to the transfer.

Headnote

A) Civil Procedure - Transfer of Suit - Section 24 Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 - Convenience of Parties - The applicant, a widow and sole defendant, sought transfer of a recovery suit from Latur to Nagpur, citing distance of over 600 km, her employment, and her children's education. The Court held that the balance of convenience and hardship favored transfer, as the plaintiff could attend court at Nagpur without comparable difficulty. (Paras 1-5)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the suit should be transferred from Latur to Nagpur on the ground of inconvenience and hardship to the defendant.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The Misc. Civil Application is allowed. Special Civil Suit No.166 of 2009 pending in the Court of 3rd Joint Civil Judge, Senior Division, Latur, is transferred to the competent court at Nagpur. The non-applicant is at liberty to file an application for reimbursement of expenses incurred due to the transfer.

Law Points

  • Transfer of suit
  • convenience of parties
  • hardship to defendant
  • Section 24 CPC
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2011 LawText (BOM) (03) 174

Misc. Civil Application (Transfer) No.788 of 2010

2011-03-16

R.K. Deshpande, J.

Shri S.D. Sirpurkar for Applicant, Smt. V.P. Thakre for Non-Applicant

Smt. Rekha wd/o Late Avinash Raut

Shivaji Bhimrao Sapate

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Civil transfer application under Section 24 CPC for transfer of a recovery suit from Latur to Nagpur.

Remedy Sought

Transfer of Special Civil Suit No.166 of 2009 from the Court of 3rd Joint Civil Judge, Senior Division, Latur, to a competent court at Nagpur.

Filing Reason

The applicant, a widow and sole defendant, claimed extreme hardship in traveling over 600 km from Nagpur to Latur for each hearing, affecting her employment and her children's education.

Issues

Whether the suit should be transferred from Latur to Nagpur on grounds of convenience and hardship to the defendant.

Submissions/Arguments

Applicant argued that she resides in Nagpur, works as a Technician in MSRTC, has two school-going children, and traveling over 600 km to Latur would cause extreme hardship. Non-applicant opposed transfer, stating that the cause of action arose in Latur and the applicant had previously attended court there.

Ratio Decidendi

The balance of convenience and hardship favors the defendant, who is a widow and sole earning member with children, and traveling over 600 km would cause extreme hardship, while the plaintiff can attend court at Nagpur without comparable difficulty.

Judgment Excerpts

The applicant/defendant is having two children, who are taking education at Nagpur, and is serving as Technician in the Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation at Nagpur. The balance of convenience is in favour of the applicant/defendant and the non-applicant/plaintiff can attend the Court at Nagpur without any difficulty.

Procedural History

The non-applicant filed Special Civil Suit No.166 of 2009 in the Court of 3rd Joint Civil Judge, Senior Division, Latur, for recovery of Rs.3,96,000/-. Upon receipt of summons, the applicant filed the present Misc. Civil Application under Section 24 CPC for transfer of the suit to Nagpur.

Acts & Sections

  • Code of Civil Procedure, 1908: Section 24
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Gujarat High Court Allows Transfer of Divorce Suit from Surat to Amreli on Grounds of Wife's Convenience. Distance of 500-550 kms and family responsibilities of wife considered under Section 24 CPC.
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Transfer of Civil Suit from Latur to Nagpur on Grounds of Convenience and Hardship to Widow Defendant. The Court held that the balance of convenience favored the defendant, a widow and sole earning member, who would face extr...