Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Mother for Murder of Daughters by Poisoning. Circumstantial Evidence Including Last Seen, Motive, and Recovery of Poison Bottle Sufficient to Sustain Conviction Under Section 302 IPC.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: AURANGABAD In Favour of Prosecution
  • 167
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The appellant, Ujwala Bhujade, was convicted by the Adhoc Additional Sessions Judge, Aurangabad, for the murder of her two daughters, Dipali and Swati, by administering poison, and for attempting suicide, under Sections 302 and 309 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC). She was sentenced to life imprisonment for murder and a fine of Rs.250 for attempt to suicide. The incident occurred on 24 November 2006, when the appellant took her daughters to a well in the field of Jagannath Narayan Bhujade. The prosecution case was based on circumstantial evidence: the appellant was last seen with the deceased children, she had a motive due to a quarrel with her husband, a bottle containing poison was recovered from the spot, and the chemical analysis confirmed the presence of poison in the viscera of the deceased. The appellant was arrested on 1 February 2007. The trial court found the circumstances sufficient to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt. On appeal, the High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad examined the evidence and held that the chain of circumstances was complete and pointed only to the appellant's guilt. The court noted that the appellant failed to explain the circumstances, and the recovery of the poison bottle and chemical reports corroborated the prosecution case. The appeal was dismissed, and the conviction and sentence were upheld.

Headnote

A) Criminal Law - Murder - Circumstantial Evidence - Sections 302, 309 Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Conviction based on circumstantial evidence - The appellant was convicted for murder of her two daughters by administering poison and for attempting suicide. The court examined the chain of circumstances including last seen evidence, motive, recovery of poison bottle, and chemical analysis reports. Held that the circumstances were complete and pointed only to the guilt of the appellant (Paras 1-10).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the conviction of the appellant under Sections 302 and 309 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) based on circumstantial evidence is sustainable.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

Appeal dismissed. Conviction and sentence under Sections 302 and 309 IPC upheld.

Law Points

  • Circumstantial evidence
  • last seen theory
  • motive
  • recovery of poison bottle
  • chemical analysis report
  • presumption of innocence
  • burden of proof
  • Section 302 IPC
  • Section 309 IPC
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2011 LawText (BOM) (01) 6

Criminal Appeal No.238 of 2009

2011-01-24

P.V. Hardas, A.V. Potdar

Mrs. S.T. Kazi (for appellant), Mr. D.V. Tele (for respondent)

Ujwala W/o. Sonyabapu Bhujade

The State of Maharashtra

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal appeal against conviction for murder and attempt to suicide.

Remedy Sought

Appellant sought acquittal from conviction under Sections 302 and 309 IPC.

Filing Reason

Appellant was convicted for murder of her two daughters by administering poison and for attempting suicide.

Previous Decisions

Trial court convicted appellant on 09/04/2009 in Sessions Case No.279/2007.

Issues

Whether the circumstantial evidence is sufficient to sustain conviction under Section 302 IPC. Whether the conviction under Section 309 IPC is sustainable.

Submissions/Arguments

Appellant argued that the evidence was insufficient and circumstantial. State argued that the chain of circumstances was complete and pointed to guilt.

Ratio Decidendi

In a case based on circumstantial evidence, the circumstances must be fully established and must form a complete chain pointing only to the guilt of the accused. The failure of the accused to explain incriminating circumstances can be considered as an additional link.

Judgment Excerpts

The appellant has questioned the correctness and legality of her conviction for the offence punishable u/s. 302 of The IPC... Such of the facts as are necessary for the decision of this appeal can be summarized as follows...

Procedural History

The appellant was convicted by the Adhoc Additional Sessions Judge, Aurangabad on 09/04/2009 in Sessions Case No.279/2007. She appealed to the High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad.

Acts & Sections

  • Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC): 302, 309
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court High Court Quashes FIR in Rape Case Due to Consensual Relationship. Relationship was consensual and no prima facie case of rape under Section 376 IPC.
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal of Probationary Officer in Service Termination Case; Upholds Termination for Unfitness Without Stigma. Unfit to be Appointed Under Punjab Police Service Rules Rule 8(b) Does Not Attract Rule 9 of Punjab Civil Services (...