Special Court Tries Accused in Securities Transactions Fraud for Criminal Breach of Trust under IPC. Charges Include Section 409 IPC and Prevention of Corruption Act for Bank Fund Misappropriation and Forgery.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY
  • 4
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The Central Bureau of Investigation prosecuted R. Dhankumar, S.P. Kamach, and Hiten P. Dalal before the Special Court for Trial of Offences Relating to Transactions in Securities at Mumbai in Special Case No. 1 of 1998. The case originated from RC No. 4(BSC)/93-BOM. The accused faced trial on charges including criminal breach of trust as public servants (Section 409 IPC), dishonestly receiving stolen property (Section 411 IPC), forgery (Section 465 IPC), falsification of accounts (Section 477A IPC), intentional omission to give information of offences (Section 202 IPC), and criminal conspiracy (Section 120B IPC). Additionally, accused nos. 1 and 2 were charged under Section 13(1)(c) and 13(1)(d) read with Section 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, for abusing their official positions to obtain undue pecuniary advantage for accused no. 3. The prosecution alleged that the accused committed these offences in connection with transactions in securities, leading to misappropriation of bank funds. Earlier, three co-accused were discharged from the case. The trial proceeded against the remaining three accused, who appeared on bail. After conclusion of arguments, judgment was reserved on November 19, 2010, and pronounced on November 26, 2010, by Judge J.H. Bhatia. The available text does not include the court's final decision or reasoning, and the outcome remains unascertained.

Issue of Consideration

Whether the accused are guilty of offences under Sections 409, 411, 465, 477A, 202 IPC and Section 13(1)(c) and 13(1)(d) read with Section 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, and criminal conspiracy under Section 120B IPC

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Law Points

  • Criminal breach of trust by public servant
  • misappropriation
  • forgery
  • falsification of accounts
  • omission to give information
  • abuse of official position
  • conspiracy
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2010 LawText (BOM) (11) 22

Special Case No. 1 of 1998 in RC No. 4(BSC)/93-BOM

2010-11-26

J.H. Bhatia

V.C. Gupte, R.S. Mhamane, Parvez Ubhare, Sunil Kale

Central Bureau of Investigation

R. Dhankumar, S.P. Kamach, Hiten P. Dalal

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal trial for offences relating to transactions in securities, involving breach of trust, misappropriation of bank funds, forgery, and corruption.

Remedy Sought

Central Bureau of Investigation sought conviction of the accused for the alleged criminal offences.

Filing Reason

Alleged commission of offences of criminal breach of trust, misappropriation, forgery, falsification of accounts, omission to inform, abuse of official position, and conspiracy leading to undue pecuniary advantage.

Previous Decisions

Three co-accused (Vishnu Deuskar, Akash Rukhaiyar, Girija Shankar Sahoo) were discharged prior to trial.

Issues

Whether accused nos. 1 and 2, being public servants, committed criminal breach of trust under Section 409 IPC. Whether the accused dishonestly received stolen property under Section 411 IPC. Whether the accused committed forgery under Section 465 IPC. Whether the accused falsified accounts under Section 477A IPC. Whether there was intentional omission to give information of offences under Section 202 IPC. Whether accused nos. 1 and 2 abused their official position to obtain undue pecuniary advantage for accused no. 3 under Sections 13(1)(c) and 13(1)(d) read with 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act. Whether all the accused were party to a criminal conspiracy under Section 120B IPC.

Judgment Excerpts

The accused Nos. 1, 2 and 3 face this trial for the offences of breach of trust and misappropriation of amount of the Bank, forgery, falsification of accounts, omission to give information of the offences committed, abusing the official position of accused Nos. 1 and 2 for obtaining undue pecuniary advantage to accused No.3 and conspiracy to commit all these offences punishable under Sections 409, 411, 465, 477A, 202 of IPC, under Section 13(1)(c) and 13(1)(d) read with section 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act read with Section 120B of IPC.

Procedural History

The case was investigated by CBI under RC No. 4(BSC)/93-BOM. Charges were framed against six accused; three were discharged. Trial commenced against R. Dhankumar (accused no.1), S.P. Kamach (accused no.2), and Hiten P. Dalal (accused no.3) before the Special Court. Judgment was reserved on 19.11.2010 and pronounced on 26.11.2010.

Acts & Sections

  • Indian Penal Code, 1860: 409, 411, 465, 477A, 202, 120B
  • Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988: 13(1)(c), 13(1)(d), 13(2)
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Witness Testimony and Contradictions. Conviction under Sections 148, 302/149 IPC Set Aside as Eye-Witnesses' Statements Were Parrot-Like and Contradictory on Material Particulars.
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Upholds Dismissal of Sub-Inspector in Police Act Case — Superintendent of Police Holds Same Authority as District Superintendent. Re-employed Deputy Superintendent of Police Qualifies as Superior Officer for Departmental Enquiry Under...