Bombay High Court Quashes Custodian's Order for Lack of Jurisdiction in Evacuee Property Restoration Case. Custodian of Evacuee Property Had No Authority to Entertain Application Under Section 15 of Goa Administration of Evacuee Property Act, 1964.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: GOA
  • 200
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioners, legal heirs of late Jorge Anibal de Matos Sequiera, filed an application under Section 15 of the Goa Administration of Evacuee Property Act, 1964 before the Custodian of Evacuee Property (Respondent No.1) seeking restoration of property. The Custodian rejected the application on 24/6/2010 on two grounds: (i) the petitioners failed to produce documents proving they were of Indian origin, and (ii) the Custodian did not hold the mining concessions which had lapsed. The petitioners challenged this order by way of a writ petition. During the proceedings, the State of Goa (Respondent No.2) filed an affidavit stating that the Government had not authorized any officer under Section 15(1) of the Act to entertain applications for restoration of evacuee property. The Court observed that the Custodian had no authority to deal with the application, yet he entertained it and passed the impugned order after three years. Consequently, the Court held that the order was patently without jurisdiction and quashed it. The Court granted liberty to the petitioners to file a fresh application under Section 15 before the State Government within one week, and directed the State Government to dispose of the same within three months.

Headnote

A) Administrative Law - Jurisdiction - Authority to Entertain Application - Section 15 Goa Administration of Evacuee Property Act, 1964 - The Custodian of Evacuee Property passed an order rejecting an application for restoration of property, but the State Government's affidavit disclosed that no officer was authorized under Section 15(1) to entertain such applications. The Court held that the Custodian had no authority to deal with the application, rendering the order patently without jurisdiction and liable to be quashed. (Paras 4-5)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the Custodian of Evacuee Property had jurisdiction to entertain an application under Section 15 of the Goa Administration of Evacuee Property Act, 1964 for restoration of evacuee property.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The impugned order dated 24/6/2010 passed by the Custodian of Evacuee Property is quashed and set aside as being without jurisdiction. Petitioners are at liberty to file a fresh application under Section 15 of the Act before the State Government within one week. The State Government is directed to dispose of the application within three months from the date of filing.

Law Points

  • Lack of jurisdiction
  • Authority to entertain application
  • Section 15 Goa Administration of Evacuee Property Act
  • 1964
  • Quashing of order without jurisdiction
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2010 LawText (BOM) (10) 143

Writ Petition No.527 of 2010

2010-10-06

A. P. Lavande

Mr. Nitin Sardessai (for petitioners), Mr. S. Bandodkar (for respondent no.2)

Maria Virgina De Matos Sequeira and others

The Custodian of Evacuee Property and the State of Goa

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition challenging order of Custodian of Evacuee Property rejecting application for restoration of evacuee property.

Remedy Sought

Petitioners sought quashing of the impugned order and direction to the State Government to consider their application for restoration.

Filing Reason

The Custodian rejected the application on grounds of lack of proof of Indian origin and that mining concessions had lapsed.

Previous Decisions

The Custodian of Evacuee Property passed order dated 24/6/2010 rejecting the application.

Issues

Whether the Custodian of Evacuee Property had jurisdiction to entertain an application under Section 15 of the Goa Administration of Evacuee Property Act, 1964.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioners argued that the impugned order was without jurisdiction as the Custodian had no authority to entertain the application. Respondent no.2 (State) filed affidavit stating that no officer was authorized under Section 15(1) to entertain such applications.

Ratio Decidendi

An order passed by an authority without jurisdiction is patently invalid and liable to be quashed. The Custodian of Evacuee Property had no authority under Section 15(1) of the Goa Administration of Evacuee Property Act, 1964 to entertain an application for restoration of evacuee property, as the State Government had not authorized any officer for that purpose.

Judgment Excerpts

Since respondent no.1 had no authority to deal with the application filed by the petitioners, the impugned order passed by him is patently without jurisdiction and deserves to be quashed and set aside and is hereby quashed and set aside.

Procedural History

Petitioners filed application under Section 15 of the Goa Administration of Evacuee Property Act, 1964 before the Custodian of Evacuee Property on 20/4/2007. The Custodian rejected the application on 24/6/2010. Petitioners challenged the order by filing Writ Petition No.527 of 2010 before the High Court of Bombay at Goa.

Acts & Sections

  • Goa Administration of Evacuee Property Act, 1964: Section 15, Section 15(1)
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Insufficient Circumstantial Evidence. Conviction under Section 302 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Establish Complete Chain of Circumstances.
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Second Appeal in Adoption Dispute — Concurrent Findings of Nullity Upheld. Adoption of Minor by Widow Without Husband's Consent and Without Registered Deed Held Void Under Hindu Adoption and Maintenance Act, 1956.