Bombay High Court Hears Appeals Arising from Conviction and Acquittal in Sessions Case Involving Multiple Offences under IPC and Arms Act. The case pertained to a fatal group clash in village Upale resulting in two homicidal deaths and injuries to several others.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY
  • 3
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The Bombay High Court heard a batch of criminal appeals arising from the judgment of the Additional Sessions Judge, Sindhudurg-Oros in Sessions Case No.44 of 1999 dated 30th April 2002. The trial court had convicted accused no.1 under sections 307, 323, 324 IPC and section 3 read with section 25 of the Arms Act, sentencing him to life imprisonment under section 307; accused no.5 under sections 302 and 307 IPC with life imprisonment; and accused nos.1,4,5,6 under section 452 IPC with six months rigorous imprisonment. Accused no.6 and other convicted accused filed appeals challenging their convictions, while the State preferred an appeal against all accused. The prosecution case centered on a long-standing political rivalry in village Upale between two groups, one led by accused no.1 and the other by Bhaskar Upade. On 20th May 1998 at around 10:15 p.m., accused nos.1,2,4,5,6 allegedly trespassed into the house of PW14 Shankar Pandurang Upade, where accused no.1, armed with a chopper and revolver, threatened and assaulted PW14, and later stabbed PW18 Jaidas with a chopper. Accused no.5 fired shots, killing Santosh on the spot and fatally injuring Jaishri, who later died in hospital on 22nd May 1998. Others, including PW20 Bhikaji and PW21 Nitin, received bullet injuries. The trial court accepted the evidence of eye witnesses and medical officers to hold that the deaths were homicidal and that common intention existed. However, the text of the High Court judgment is incomplete and does not contain the final analysis, ratio, or decision. The court's findings and order are not available.

Issue of Consideration

Determination of guilt of the accused for offences including murder, attempt to murder, trespass, and possession of arms, and correctness of trial court's verdict

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Law Points

  • sections 147
  • 148
  • 149
  • 452
  • 324
  • 323
  • 504
  • 506
  • 307
  • 302 of Indian Penal Code
  • section 3 read with section 25 of Arms Act
  • common intention under section 34 IPC
  • homicidal death
  • firearm injuries
  • trespass
  • alibi plea
  • hostile witnesses
  • testimony of eye witnesses
  • medical evidence
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2010 LawText (BOM) (09) 61

Criminal Appeal No. 646 of 2002 with connected Appeals No. 650, 651, 691 of 2002

2010-09-09

B.H. Marlapalle, Anoop V. Mohta

2010:BHC-AS:17767-DB

Girish Kulkarni, M.K. Kocharekar, M.M. Deshmukh

Nitin Anant Upade, Anant Shantaram Upade, Amrit Shantaram Upade, State of Maharashtra

State of Maharashtra, Anant Shankar Upade, Shankar Pandurang Upade, etc.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal appeals against conviction and acquittal in a sessions case involving murder, attempt to murder, trespass, and arms offences.

Remedy Sought

Convicted accused sought setting aside of conviction; State sought enhancement of sentence or reversal of acquittal.

Filing Reason

Aggrieved by the judgment and order dated 30th April 2002 of the Additional Sessions Judge, Sindhudurg-Oros in Sessions Case No.44 of 1999.

Previous Decisions

Trial court convicted accused no.1 under sections 307, 323, 324 IPC and Arms Act, accused no.5 under sections 302, 307 IPC, and accused nos.1,4,5,6 under section 452 IPC; rest were acquitted.

Issues

Whether the homicidal deaths of Santosh and Jaishri were properly proved. Whether the accused committed house trespass and voluntarily caused hurt. Whether accused no.5 committed murder of Santosh and Jaishri. Whether the accused shared common intention to cause injuries to Nitin and Bhikaji. Whether the State appeal against acquittal of other accused was maintainable.

Judgment Excerpts

As per the prosecution case there was a rivalry in two political groups in village Upale. Accused No.5 shot him and he was lying at about 25 ft. away from the house. Thus Jaishri died a homicidal death on account of fire arm injuries is not in dispute.

Procedural History

The case was committed to the Court of Sessions; trial held; Additional Sessions Judge convicted and acquitted on 30-04-2002; appeals filed; heard on 08-07-2010; judgment reserved and pronounced on 09-09-2010.

Acts & Sections

  • Indian Penal Code, 1860: 147, 148, 149, 452, 324, 323, 504, 506, 307, 302, 34
  • Arms Act, 1959: 3, 25
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Special Court Convicts Former SBI Assistant Manager for Forgery and Diversion of Funds to Broker Harshad Mehta. Accused Held Guilty of Issuing False Sale Notes and Illegally Transferring Proceeds to Personal Account of Harshad Mehta Under Sections 46...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Hears Appeals Arising from Conviction and Acquittal in Sessions Case Involving Multiple Offences under IPC and Arms Act. The case pertained to a fatal group clash in village Upale resulting in two homicidal deaths and injuries to se...