Bombay High Court Punishes Contemnor for Fabricating Documents to Obtain Bail for Life Convict. Filing of forged wedding invitation cards to mislead the court amounts to criminal contempt under Section 2(c)(iii) of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY
  • 3
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The applicant, Ganesh @ Premnath Dattu Deore, a life convict lodged in Nasik Central Prison, filed an application for temporary bail on the ground that his younger sister was to get married. The court directed the learned APP to make an enquiry, which revealed that the applicant's sister Rohini was already married on 26.5.2003, and the wedding cards annexed to the application were fabricated to persuade the court to grant bail. The contemnor, Vishwas Tulsiram Shinde, who is the brother-in-law of the applicant, admitted that the invitation cards were fabricated only to snatch a bail order from the court. The court issued a contempt notice to him, and he tendered an unconditional oral apology. The court appointed Mr. Sarang Kotwal to appear for the contemnor. The court referred to Section 2(c)(iii) of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, which defines criminal contempt as any act that interferes or tends to interfere with the administration of justice. The court also referred to the Supreme Court judgment in Chandra Shashi v. Anil Kumar Verma (1995) 1 SCC 421, where a suo motu contempt action was initiated for filing a fabricated document. The court held that the contemnor's act of fabricating documents to mislead the court amounts to criminal contempt. Considering the gravity of the act, the court sentenced the contemnor to simple imprisonment for one month and a fine of Rs. 2,000, in default, further simple imprisonment for one week. The court also directed that the fine be paid to the applicant's sister Rohini.

Headnote

A) Contempt of Court - Criminal Contempt - Fabrication of Documents - Section 2(c)(iii) Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 - The contemnor fabricated wedding invitation cards to falsely represent that the applicant's sister was unmarried, in order to obtain temporary bail for the applicant, a life convict. The court held that such conduct interferes with the administration of justice and constitutes criminal contempt. (Paras 1-5)

B) Contempt of Court - Punishment - Apology - Section 12 Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 - The contemnor tendered an unconditional oral apology on the first day. However, considering the gravity of the act of fabricating documents to mislead the court, the court sentenced him to simple imprisonment for one month and a fine of Rs. 2,000. (Paras 6-7)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether filing fabricated documents to obtain bail amounts to criminal contempt under the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The contemnor Vishwas Tulsiram Shinde is sentenced to simple imprisonment for one month and to pay a fine of Rs. 2,000, in default, to undergo further simple imprisonment for one week. The fine, if recovered, shall be paid to the applicant's sister Rohini.

Law Points

  • Criminal contempt
  • Fabrication of documents
  • Misleading the court
  • Interference with administration of justice
  • Contempt of Courts Act
  • 1971 Section 2(c)(iii)
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2010 LawText (BOM) (07) 74

Criminal Application No. 759 of 2010 in Criminal Appeal No. 934 of 2008

2010-07-23

Smt. Ranjana Desai, Smt. V.K. Tahilramani

Ms. N.V. Pradhan for applicant, Mr. H.J. Dedhia APP for State, Mr. S.V. Kotwal for Mr. Vishwas Tulsiram Shinde

Ganesh @ Premnath Dattu Deore

The State of Maharashtra

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal contempt proceedings initiated suo motu by the court for filing fabricated documents to obtain bail.

Remedy Sought

The applicant sought temporary bail on the ground of his sister's marriage.

Filing Reason

The applicant's sister was already married, and the wedding cards were fabricated to mislead the court.

Previous Decisions

The court had directed an enquiry which revealed the fabrication; contempt notice was issued on 22.7.2010.

Issues

Whether filing fabricated documents to obtain bail amounts to criminal contempt under the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971.

Submissions/Arguments

The contemnor admitted the fabrication and tendered an unconditional oral apology. The applicant's counsel did not justify the conduct and withdrew from the matter.

Ratio Decidendi

Filing fabricated documents to mislead the court and obtain a bail order amounts to criminal contempt under Section 2(c)(iii) of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, as it interferes with the administration of justice.

Judgment Excerpts

The contemnor admitted that the invitation cards were fabricated cards only to snatch bail order from this Court. We must note that he tendered an unconditional oral apology and prayed for leniency on the first day.

Procedural History

On 22.7.2010, the court issued contempt notice to the contemnor. On 23.7.2010, after hearing the contemnor and considering the apology, the court sentenced him.

Acts & Sections

  • Contempt of Courts Act, 1971: 2(c)(iii), 12
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Grants Bail to NDPS Accused After 2 Years 11 Months Custody. High Court's Rejection Based on Co-Accused's Non-Surrender Set Aside as Each Accused's Case Must Be Considered on Its Own Merits Under Section 20(b)(ii)(C) of NDPS Act.
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad Dismisses State's Writ Petition Challenging Labour Court Award of Reinstatement with Back Wages. Termination of Workman Held Illegal for Non-Compliance with Section 25-F of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.