Bombay High Court Quashes University's Withdrawal of Principal's Appointment Approval Due to Violation of Natural Justice. Appointment of Principal cannot be revoked without affording opportunity of hearing as per principles of natural justice.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: AURANGABAD In Favour of Accused
  • 2
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Dr. Ajit Uttamrao Wagh, was appointed as Principal of Arts, Science and Commerce College, Warangaon, after a selection process. The respondent no. 2 society published an advertisement on 5/5/1992, and the Selection Committee interviewed candidates on 30/7/1992, recommending the petitioner's name. The Vice Chancellor of North Maharashtra University approved the recommendation on 23/9/1992, and the petitioner joined as Principal. However, on 25/11/1994, the Management Council of the University passed a resolution withdrawing the approval granted to the petitioner's appointment on the ground that the Chairman of the Governing Body was not present in the Selection Committee meeting, allegedly violating Statute 413 (B) (2). The Registrar communicated this to the society on 8/12/1994. The petitioner challenged this resolution by way of a writ petition, also seeking to contest the Senate elections, which became infructuous due to his retirement. The court observed that the resolution withdrawing approval was passed without affording any opportunity of hearing to the petitioner, which is a clear violation of principles of natural justice. The court quashed the resolution dated 25/11/1994 and the communication dated 8/12/1994, but did not grant any consequential relief as the petitioner had already retired. The court did not examine the merits of the ground for withdrawal.

Headnote

A) Administrative Law - Natural Justice - Audi Alteram Partem - Withdrawal of Approval - The University Management Council withdrew approval of petitioner's appointment as Principal without giving him an opportunity of hearing. The court held that the resolution withdrawing approval was passed in violation of principles of natural justice and quashed the same. (Paras 1-6)

B) University Law - Appointment of Principal - Statute 413 (B) (2) - Selection Committee - The ground for withdrawal was that the Chairman of the Governing Body was not present in the Selection Committee meeting, allegedly violating Statute 413 (B) (2). The court did not delve into the merits of this ground as the resolution was quashed on the ground of violation of natural justice. (Paras 5-6)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the resolution of the Management Council of the University withdrawing the approval granted to the appointment of the petitioner as Principal is sustainable in law, particularly when the petitioner was not afforded an opportunity of hearing before passing the resolution.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The court quashed the resolution dated 25/11/1994 and the communication dated 8/12/1994, but did not grant any consequential relief as the petitioner had retired.

Law Points

  • Natural Justice
  • Audi Alteram Partem
  • Withdrawal of Approval
  • Appointment of Principal
  • University Statutes
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2010 LawText (BOM) (06) 13

Writ Petition No. 4527 of 1994

2010-06-23

B.R. Gavai, S.V. Gangapurwala

Mr. S.C. Bora for Petitioner, Mr. S.N. Kendre for State, Mr. S.S. Choudhari for Respondent No. 1, Mr. V.D. Hon for Respondent No. 2

Dr. Ajit Uttamrao Wagh

North Maharashtra University, Jalgaon District Maratha Vidyaprasarak Cooperative Samaj Ltd., State of Maharashtra

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ Petition challenging the resolution of the Management Council of the University withdrawing approval of the petitioner's appointment as Principal.

Remedy Sought

Quashing of the resolution dated 25/11/1994 withdrawing approval and direction to allow petitioner to contest Senate elections.

Filing Reason

The University withdrew approval of petitioner's appointment without giving him an opportunity of hearing.

Issues

Whether the resolution of the Management Council withdrawing approval of the petitioner's appointment is sustainable in law when passed without affording opportunity of hearing.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued that the resolution withdrawing approval was passed in violation of principles of natural justice as no opportunity of hearing was given. Respondents argued that the Selection Committee meeting was not valid as per Statute 413 (B) (2) due to absence of Chairman of Governing Body.

Ratio Decidendi

Any decision withdrawing approval of appointment must be preceded by an opportunity of hearing to the affected person, failing which it is violative of principles of natural justice and liable to be quashed.

Judgment Excerpts

The resolution withdrawing the approval granted to the appointment of the petitioner as Principal of the College is passed without giving any opportunity of hearing to the petitioner. The same is in clear violation of the principles of natural justice. In the light of the above, the resolution dated 25/11/1994 and the communication dated 8/12/1994 are quashed and set aside.

Procedural History

The petitioner filed Writ Petition No. 4527 of 1994 in the High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Bench at Aurangabad, challenging the resolution dated 25/11/1994 of the Management Council of North Maharashtra University withdrawing approval of his appointment as Principal. The petition was heard and decided on 23/06/2010.

Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Central Excise Case, Upholds MODVAT Credit for Purification and Filtration of Acids. Processes of purification and filtration of Hydrochloric Acid and Sulphuric Acid, though not causing chemical change,...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Quashes University's Withdrawal of Principal's Appointment Approval Due to Violation of Natural Justice. Appointment of Principal cannot be revoked without affording opportunity of hearing as per principles of natural justice.