Bombay High Court Directs Consideration of Licence Shifting in Country Liquor Licence Suspension Case. Petitioner's request for shifting CL III Licence from Ambada to Morshi to be decided within 3 months despite suspension under section 142 of Bombay Prohibition Act.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: NAGPUR In Favour of Accused
  • 35
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Rajendra Shivnarayan Jaiswal, held a country liquor (CL III) licence which was suspended under section 142 of the Bombay Prohibition Act due to a law and order problem in the area of village Ambada. The petitioner had previously applied for shifting the licence from Ambada to Morshi Town, but the authorities had not taken any decision on that application. The petitioner filed a writ petition seeking relief. The High Court noted that there was no dispute about the existence of the law and order problem. However, considering that the petitioner had long ago applied for shifting, the Court directed the respondents to consider the petitioner's request for shifting the CL III Licence from Ambada to Morshi in accordance with law and to take a decision within three months. The rule was made absolute in those terms.

Headnote

A) Excise Law - Suspension of Licence - Section 142, Bombay Prohibition Act, 1949 - Shifting of Licence - The petitioner's country liquor licence was suspended under section 142 due to law and order problem in the area. The petitioner had applied for shifting the licence from village Ambada to Morshi Town, but the authorities had not responded. The High Court directed the respondents to consider the petitioner's request for shifting the licence in accordance with law and take a decision within three months. (Paras 2-3)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the respondents should consider the petitioner's request for shifting his CL III Licence from village Ambada to Morshi Town despite the suspension of the licence under section 142 of the Bombay Prohibition Act due to law and order problem.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The Court directed the respondents to consider the petitioner's request for shifting the present CL III Licence from village Ambada to Morshi, in accordance with law, and take a decision within a period of 3 months from the date of the order. Rule made absolute in the aforesaid terms.

Law Points

  • Suspension under section 142 of Bombay Prohibition Act
  • Direction to consider shifting of licence
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2010 LawText (BOM) (03) 189

Writ Petition No.201 of 2010

2010-03-09

S.A. Bobde, Vasanti A. Naik

Shri Anand Parchure for petitioner; Smt. Sharda Wandile AGP for respondents 1 to 5

Rajendra s/o Shivnarayan Jaiswal

State of Maharashtra through its Secretary, Department of Prohibition & State Excise; The Commissioner of State Excise, Maharashtra State; The Collector, Amravati; The Superintendent of State Excise, Amravati; The Superintendent of Police (Rural), Amravati; Dr. Anil Bonde, M.L.A.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition challenging suspension of country liquor licence and seeking direction to consider shifting of licence.

Remedy Sought

Petitioner sought direction to respondents to consider his request for shifting CL III Licence from village Ambada to Morshi Town.

Filing Reason

Petitioner's country liquor licence was suspended under section 142 of the Bombay Prohibition Act due to law and order problem, and his earlier application for shifting the licence was not responded to.

Issues

Whether the respondents should consider the petitioner's request for shifting his CL III Licence from village Ambada to Morshi Town despite the suspension under section 142 of the Bombay Prohibition Act.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner's counsel submitted that the petitioner had long ago applied for shifting of CL III Licence from village Ambada to Morshi Town, but the authorities have not responded.

Ratio Decidendi

Where a licence is suspended due to law and order problem, the authority must consider a pending application for shifting the licence to another location in accordance with law, and a decision must be taken within a reasonable time.

Judgment Excerpts

According to the petitioner, his country liquor licence has been suspended under section 142 of the Bombay Prohibition Act in view of the law and order problem prevailing in the area. In these circumstances, we consider it appropriate to direct the respondents to consider the petitioner's request for shifting the present CL III Licence from village Ambada to Morshi, in accordance with law, and take a decision within a period of 3 months from today.

Procedural History

The petitioner filed a writ petition in the High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Nagpur Bench, challenging the suspension of his country liquor licence and seeking a direction to consider his application for shifting the licence. The Court heard the matter and passed the order on 9th March 2010.

Acts & Sections

  • Bombay Prohibition Act, 1949: 142
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Directs Consideration of Licence Shifting in Country Liquor Licence Suspension Case. Petitioner's request for shifting CL III Licence from Ambada to Morshi to be decided within 3 months despite suspension under section 142 of Bombay...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Quashes Cancellation of Caste Validity Certificate for Violation of Natural Justice — Committee Cannot Cancel Certificate Without Issuing Show Cause Notice and Providing Hearing