Bombay High Court Dismisses Teachers' Association Challenge to Government Circular on Teacher Deployment in Zilla Parishad Schools. Circular dated 6th October 2008 held to be within government's policy-making power and not arbitrary.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: NAGPUR
  • 107
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Maharashtra Rajya Prathmik Shikshak Samiti, an association of primary teachers, filed a writ petition challenging a Government Circular dated 6th October 2008 issued by the State of Maharashtra. The circular pertained to the deployment of teachers in Zilla Parishad schools. The petitioner sought setting aside of the circular and consequential directions. The court examined the circular and found that it was a policy decision taken by the government in the interest of administration. The court noted that teachers do not have a vested right to be posted in a particular school. The court held that the circular was not arbitrary and was within the government's policy-making power. The petition was dismissed with no order as to costs.

Headnote

A) Service Law - Teacher Deployment - Government Policy - Circular dated 6th October 2008 - The petitioner association challenged the circular as arbitrary. The court held that the circular was a policy decision within the government's domain and not arbitrary. The court found no vested right in teachers to be posted in a particular school. The petition was dismissed. (Paras 1-6)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the Government Circular dated 6th October 2008 regarding deployment of teachers in Zilla Parishad schools is arbitrary and liable to be set aside.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

Writ Petition dismissed. No order as to costs.

Law Points

  • Government policy
  • Teacher deployment
  • Zilla Parishad schools
  • Circular validity
  • No vested right
  • Policy decision
  • Judicial review limited
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2010 LawText (BOM) (02) 115

Writ Petition No.1097 of 2009

2010-02-22

A.H. Joshi, P.B. Varale

Mr. B.G. Kulkarni for petitioner, Mr. D.P. Thakre (Asstt. Govt. Pleader) for respondent no.1, Mr. G.G. Mishra for respondent nos. 2 and 3

Maharashtra Rajya Prathmik Shikshak Samiti, through its District President Shri Namdeorao son of Jagdeorao Fale

1. The State of Maharashtra, through its Secretary, Rural Development & Water Conservation Department, 2. Zilla Parishad, Akola, through its Chief Executive Officer, 3. The Block Development Officer, Panchayat Samiti, Telhara, Distt. Akola

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition challenging government circular on teacher deployment

Remedy Sought

Setting aside of Government Circular dated 6th October 2008 and consequential directions

Filing Reason

Petitioner association aggrieved by the government's decision on teacher deployment in Zilla Parishad schools

Issues

Whether the Government Circular dated 6th October 2008 is arbitrary and liable to be set aside.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued that the circular was arbitrary and should be set aside. Respondents supported the circular as a policy decision.

Ratio Decidendi

The government's circular on teacher deployment is a policy decision within its domain and not arbitrary. Teachers have no vested right to be posted in a particular school.

Judgment Excerpts

Perusal of the Govt. Circular dated 6th October, 2008 reveals the following:- [a] Number of teachers in Zilla Parishad schools has to be decided on the basis ...

Procedural History

Writ Petition filed in 2009. Heard finally by consent of parties on 22nd February 2010.

Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Quashes Reassessment Notice Under Section 148 of Income Tax Act, 1961 for Lack of Proper Sanction. Reassessment proceedings initiated without valid approval under Section 151 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 are invalid.
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Upholds Alienee's Right in Hindu Joint Family Property Partition Suit; Limitation Not Barred Despite Absence of Possession. Purchaser of Undivided Coparcenary Share Could Maintain Suit for Partition and Possession as Symbolic Possession...