Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging De-recognition of School for Violation of Natural Justice. De-recognition Order Quashed as Show Cause Notice Not Issued Before Withdrawal of Recognition.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY In Favour of Accused
  • 2
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Kashi Shikshan Sanstha, through its Secretary, challenged the order of de-recognition of its school passed by the Director of Education, Secondary and Higher Secondary Education, Maharashtra, Pune, communicated on 22.6.2009. The petitioner contended that the impugned order was passed without issuing a show cause notice and without affording a hearing. The respondents argued that a show cause notice was given and a hearing was conducted, and that the de-recognition was reversed earlier by the Director who granted permission to continue the school for one year. Since the petitioner did not comply during that period, recognition was withdrawn again, and no further hearing was necessary. The court examined the order of the Director of Education and found that the earlier order had reversed the de-recognition and granted one year for compliance. However, the subsequent de-recognition was not preceded by a show cause notice. The court held that the principles of natural justice require that before any adverse action like de-recognition, the affected party must be given a show cause notice and an opportunity of hearing. The fact that the petitioner had a previous opportunity to comply did not dispense with the requirement of a fresh notice before the second de-recognition. The court quashed the impugned order and directed the respondents to issue a show cause notice to the petitioner, hear them, and pass a fresh order within three months. The petition was allowed with no order as to costs.

Headnote

A) Administrative Law - Natural Justice - De-recognition of School - Requirement of Show Cause Notice - Maharashtra Secondary and Higher Secondary Education Act - The court held that de-recognition of a school without issuing a show cause notice and without affording an opportunity of hearing is violative of principles of natural justice. The earlier reversal of de-recognition and grant of one-year compliance period does not obviate the need for a fresh show cause notice before subsequent de-recognition. (Paras 2-5)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the de-recognition of the petitioner's school without issuing a show cause notice and without hearing the petitioner is valid.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The petition is allowed. The impugned order dated 22.6.2009 is quashed and set aside. The respondents are directed to issue a show cause notice to the petitioner, hear the petitioner, and pass a fresh order within three months. No order as to costs.

Law Points

  • Natural justice
  • Show cause notice
  • De-recognition of school
  • Opportunity of hearing
  • Compliance period
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2010 LawText (BOM) (01) 457

Writ Petition No.3385 of 2009

2010-01-06

S.A. Bobde, Smt. Vasanti A. Naik

Shri A.Z. Jibhkate for petitioner, Shri S.J. Jichkar for respondents

Kashi Shikshan Sanstha, Kelkarwadi, Wardha, through its Secretary - Shri Shyam Dadasaheb Jibhkate

1) Director of Education, Secondary and Higher Secondary Education, State of Maharashtra, Pune. 2) Dy. Director of Education, Nagpur Division, Nagpur. 3) Education Officer (Sec.), Zilla Parishad, Wardha.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition challenging de-recognition of school.

Remedy Sought

Quashing of de-recognition order dated 22.6.2009.

Filing Reason

De-recognition order passed without show cause notice and hearing.

Previous Decisions

Earlier de-recognition was reversed by Director of Education who granted one year permission to continue school; recognition withdrawn again after non-compliance.

Issues

Whether de-recognition of school without show cause notice and hearing is valid.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner: Impugned order passed without show cause notice and hearing. Respondents: Show cause notice was given and hearing conducted; after one-year compliance period, no further hearing necessary.

Ratio Decidendi

De-recognition of a school without issuing a show cause notice and without affording an opportunity of hearing is violative of principles of natural justice. The earlier reversal of de-recognition and grant of compliance period does not dispense with the requirement of a fresh show cause notice before subsequent de-recognition.

Judgment Excerpts

We are unable to accept the contention canvassed on behalf of the respondents. We find from the order of the Director of Education that the earlier order of de-recognition was reversed and the petitioner was granted permission to continue the School for one year. The impugned order of de-recognition is not preceded by a show cause notice.

Procedural History

The petitioner's school was de-recognized by communication dated 22.6.2009. The petitioner challenged this order by filing Writ Petition No.3385 of 2009 before the Bombay High Court, Nagpur Bench. The court heard the matter and delivered judgment on 6.1.2010.

Acts & Sections

  • Maharashtra Secondary and Higher Secondary Education Act:
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging De-recognition of School for Violation of Natural Justice. De-recognition Order Quashed as Show Cause Notice Not Issued Before Withdrawal of Recognition.
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Karnataka Quashes Bail Granted to Accused in Extortion and Forgery Case — Bail Order Set Aside for Non-Compliance with Section 41A CrPC Notice and Lack of Application of Mind. The court held that the trial court's order granting bail ...