Bombay High Court Allows Management's Petition in Education Service Dispute — Deputy Director's Order Directing Salary Payment Quashed for Lack of Jurisdiction. Deputy Director of Education Cannot Order Salary Recovery as No Such Power is Conferred by Law.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY In Favour of Accused
  • 11
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioners, a management body and a junior college, challenged an order dated 09.06.2009 passed by the Deputy Director of Education, Amravati Division. The Deputy Director had directed the management to pay salary to respondent no.3, a teacher, for the years 1997-98 and 2000-01, while also holding that the teacher's approval was rightly rejected. The teacher had been appointed subject to departmental approval, but the department did not approve his services, leading to non-payment of salary for those years. The teacher had not been in service since 2001-02. He filed Writ Petition No.5794/2006, and the High Court directed the Deputy Director to consider the question of approval after hearing parties, without granting any prayer for salary payment. The Deputy Director then passed the impugned order. The petitioners argued that the Deputy Director had no jurisdiction to direct payment of salary, and that the order was passed without notice to them. The court agreed, holding that the Deputy Director of Education does not have the power to recover or direct payment of salary under the law. The court set aside the part of the order directing salary payment, while leaving the rest of the order undisturbed. The rule was made absolute accordingly.

Headnote

A) Education Law - Service Dispute - Jurisdiction of Deputy Director - Deputy Director of Education lacks power to direct payment of salary - The Deputy Director of Education, while considering approval of appointment, cannot order the management to pay salary as no such power is conferred by law - Held that the order directing payment of salary is without jurisdiction and void (Paras 7-8).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the Deputy Director of Education has the power to direct payment of salary to a teacher whose approval was rejected.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The court allowed the writ petition, setting aside the part of the impugned order directing payment of salary to respondent no.3, while leaving the rest of the order undisturbed. Rule made absolute.

Law Points

  • Deputy Director of Education lacks power to direct payment of salary
  • Order without jurisdiction is void
  • No power to recover salary under education laws
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2010 LawText (BOM) (01) 387

Writ Petition No. 4771/2009

2010-01-19

S.A. Bobde, Smt. Vasanti A. Naik

Mr. A.S. Kilor for petitioners, Mrs. B.H. Dangre for respondent nos.1 and 2, Mr. V.A. Kothale for respondent no.3

The Maharashtra Shikshan Samiti and Late Bhagirathibai Deshmukh Jr. College

State of Maharashtra, Deputy Director of Education, and Dinesh Umraoji Korde

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition challenging order of Deputy Director of Education directing payment of salary to a teacher.

Remedy Sought

Petitioners sought quashing of the order dated 09.06.2009 directing payment of salary.

Filing Reason

The Deputy Director of Education directed the management to pay salary for years 1997-98 and 2000-01 despite holding that the teacher's approval was rightly rejected.

Previous Decisions

The teacher had filed Writ Petition No.5794/2006, and the High Court directed the Deputy Director to consider the question of approval after hearing parties, without granting any prayer for salary payment.

Issues

Whether the Deputy Director of Education has the power to direct payment of salary to a teacher whose approval was rejected.

Submissions/Arguments

The petitioners submitted that the Deputy Director of Education had no jurisdiction to direct payment of salary, and the order was passed without notice to them.

Ratio Decidendi

The Deputy Director of Education does not have the power to recover salary and direct it to be paid to a teacher, as no such power is conferred by law. An order without jurisdiction is void.

Judgment Excerpts

The Deputy Director of Education did not have the power to recover the salary and direct it to be paid to the respondent no.3. The law does not confer any such power on the Deputy Director of Education.

Procedural History

The teacher filed Writ Petition No.5794/2006; High Court directed Deputy Director to consider approval question; Deputy Director passed order on 09.06.2009 directing salary payment; management filed present writ petition challenging that order.

Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court A-Kharab vs B-Kharab Land Judgment: Karnataka High Court Rules No Reclassification Without Survey & Records (2026)
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Management's Petition in Education Service Dispute — Deputy Director's Order Directing Salary Payment Quashed for Lack of Jurisdiction. Deputy Director of Education Cannot Order Salary Recovery as No Such Power is Conferred...