Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition for Assured Career Progression Scheme to Stenographer in Public Works Department — Entitlement to ACPS as Junior Stenographer from 26.8.2004. The court held that the petitioner is entitled to the Assured Career Progression Scheme with effect from 26.8.2004, relying on earlier orders in related matters.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY In Favour of Prosecution
  • 15
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Mrs. Terezinha Fernandes, a Stenographer in the Public Works Department, Government of Goa, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a writ of mandamus directing the respondents to grant her the Assured Career Progression Scheme (ACPS) as Junior Stenographer and not as Work Assistant. The petitioner had pressed for relief in terms of prayer clause (a) of the petition. The respondents, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, referred to an order passed by a Division Bench of the Bombay High Court at Goa in Misc. Civil Application No.516/2009 in Writ Petition No.269/2001 dated 16.11.2009. The court, after perusing the record and considering the submissions, found that the petitioner was entitled to the ACPS with effect from 26.8.2004, in view of the earlier orders. The writ petition was partly allowed, and the rule was made absolute in those terms. No order as to costs was made.

Headnote

A) Service Law - Assured Career Progression Scheme - Entitlement - The petitioner, a Stenographer in the Public Works Department, sought a writ of mandamus directing the respondents to grant the Assured Career Progression Scheme (ACPS) as Junior Stenographer and not as Work Assistant. The court, relying on earlier orders in Writ Petition No.269/2001 and Misc. Civil Application No.516/2009, held that the petitioner is entitled to ACPS with effect from 26.8.2004. The writ petition was partly allowed with no order as to costs. (Paras 3-7)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the petitioner is entitled to the Assured Career Progression Scheme as Junior Stenographer and not as Work Assistant, and from which date.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The writ petition is partly allowed. The petitioner is entitled to the Assured Career Progression Scheme with effect from 26.8.2004. Rule made absolute in those terms. No order as to costs.

Law Points

  • Assured Career Progression Scheme
  • Writ of Mandamus
  • Entitlement to ACPS
  • Effective Date
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2010 LawText (BOM) (01) 315

Writ Petition No. 781/2008

2010-01-04

N. H. PATIL, N.A. BRITTO

Mr. D. J. Pangam for petitioner, Mr. V. Rodrigues for respondents

Mrs. Terezinha Fernandes

1. The Principal Chief Engineer, Government of Goa, Public Works Department, Altinho, Panaji, Goa. 2. The State of Goa through its Chief Secretary, Secretariat, Porvorim, Goa.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a writ of mandamus for grant of Assured Career Progression Scheme.

Remedy Sought

Petitioner sought a writ of mandamus directing respondents to grant Assured Career Progression Scheme as Junior Stenographer and not as Work Assistant.

Filing Reason

Petitioner, a Stenographer, claimed entitlement to ACPS as Junior Stenographer but was allegedly not granted the same.

Previous Decisions

Division Bench order in Misc. Civil Application No.516/2009 in Writ Petition No.269/2001 dated 16.11.2009 and order in Writ Petition No.269/01 dated 21/3/2005.

Issues

Whether the petitioner is entitled to the Assured Career Progression Scheme as Junior Stenographer and not as Work Assistant? From which date is the petitioner entitled to the ACPS?

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner's counsel brought to attention the order in Misc. Civil Application No.516/2009 and pressed for relief in terms of prayer clause (a). Respondents' counsel referred to the same order dated 16.11.2009.

Ratio Decidendi

The petitioner is entitled to the Assured Career Progression Scheme as Junior Stenographer with effect from 26.8.2004, in view of the earlier orders of the Division Bench in Writ Petition No.269/2001 and Misc. Civil Application No.516/2009.

Judgment Excerpts

In the present writ petition, the petitioner has mainly pressed for grant of relief in terms of prayer clause (a)... we are of the opinion that the petitioner is entitled to the Assured Career Progression Scheme with effect from 26.8.2004.

Procedural History

The petitioner filed Writ Petition No.781/2008 seeking ACPS. The court heard the matter and disposed it on 4.1.2010, relying on earlier orders in Writ Petition No.269/2001 and Misc. Civil Application No.516/2009.

Acts & Sections

  • Constitution of India: Article 226
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Revenue Appeal in Central Excise Refund Interest Case — Interest Not Payable for Period Before Completion of Claim Formalities. The Court held that under Section 11BB of Central Excise Act, 1944, interest on refund runs onl...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition for Assured Career Progression Scheme to Stenographer in Public Works Department — Entitlement to ACPS as Junior Stenographer from 26.8.2004. The court held that the petitioner is entitled to the Assured Caree...