Bombay High Court Decrees Suit for Rent and Municipal Taxes in Favor of Landlord in Summary Suit Under Order 37 CPC — Defendant Fails to Appear, Ex Parte Decree Granted. Landlord entitled to recover outstanding rent and municipal taxes from tenant for period 1989-1992 under Order 37 CPC as defendant's non-appearance and uncontroverted evidence justified ex parte decree.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY In Favour of Prosecution
  • 22
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The plaintiff, Indian Cancer Society, a registered society, filed a summary suit under Order 37 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) against the defendant, Madhusudan K. Jani, for recovery of outstanding rent and municipal taxes for the period from 19th January 1989 to 20th January 1992. The suit was maintainable in the Bombay High Court by virtue of a notification dated 11th January 1988. The defendant was served with summons, as evidenced by an affidavit of service filed on record, but failed to appear on any date. Consequently, the matter was listed under the caption 'for ex parte decree'. The plaintiff filed an affidavit dated 18th March 2009 of Dr. Arun P. Kurkure in support of the plaint averments and documents. The court took the affidavit on record and exhibited the documents collectively as Exhibits 1 to 14, noting that they remained uncontroverted. The plaintiff restricted its claim to Rs.1,34,910.75. The court decreed the suit ex parte, directing the defendant to pay the said sum with interest at 9% per annum from the date of decree until payment and realization. No order as to costs was made.

Headnote

A) Civil Procedure - Summary Suit - Order 37 CPC - Ex Parte Decree - Suit for recovery of rent and municipal taxes - Plaintiff filed suit under Order 37 CPC for outstanding rent and municipal taxes from 19th January 1989 to 20th January 1992 - Defendant failed to appear despite service - Court decreed suit ex parte based on uncontroverted affidavit and documents - Held that plaintiff is entitled to decree for Rs.1,34,910.75 with interest at 9% p.a. (Paras 1-6).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the plaintiff is entitled to a decree for outstanding rent and municipal taxes in a summary suit under Order 37 CPC when the defendant fails to appear and the plaintiff's evidence remains uncontroverted.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

Suit decreed ex parte. Defendant to pay Rs.1,34,910.75 with interest at 9% p.a. from date of decree till payment and realization. No order as to costs.

Law Points

  • Summary suit under Order 37 CPC
  • Ex parte decree
  • Uncontroverted affidavit evidence
  • Interest at 9% per annum
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2010 LawText (BOM) (01) 256

SUIT NO. 499 OF 1992

2010-01-07

Anoop V. Mohta

Mr. Tayabji Dayabhai for the Plaintiff

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Summary suit for recovery of outstanding rent and municipal taxes.

Remedy Sought

Plaintiff sought decree for payment of outstanding rent and municipal taxes from defendant.

Filing Reason

Defendant failed to pay rent and municipal taxes for the period from 19th January 1989 to 20th January 1992.

Issues

Whether the plaintiff is entitled to a decree for outstanding rent and municipal taxes in a summary suit under Order 37 CPC when the defendant fails to appear and the plaintiff's evidence remains uncontroverted.

Submissions/Arguments

Plaintiff submitted affidavit and documents in support of claim for rent and municipal taxes; defendant did not appear or contest.

Ratio Decidendi

In a summary suit under Order 37 CPC, if the defendant fails to appear despite service and the plaintiff's evidence remains uncontroverted, the court may pass an ex parte decree in favor of the plaintiff for the amount claimed.

Judgment Excerpts

The plaintiffs have filed the present suit under Order 37 of the Code of Civil Procedure Code, 1908 (for short, the CPC), and thereby claimed outstanding rent and Municipal Taxes from defendant for the period from 19th January 1989 to 20th January, 1992. The Plaintiffs have instructions restricting the claim to the extent of Rs.1,34,910.75 ps. and as there is no opposition of any kind, the present suit is decreed accordingly. The defendants to pay a sum of Rs.1,34,910.75 (Rupees one lac thirty four thousand nine hundred ten and seventy five paise only) and the interest rate shall be 9% p.a. till the payment and realization.

Procedural History

Suit filed in 1992 under Order 37 CPC. Defendant served but failed to appear. Matter listed for ex parte decree. Plaintiff filed affidavit and documents. Court decreed suit ex parte on 7th January 2010.

Acts & Sections

  • Code of Civil Procedure, 1908: Order 37
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Decrees Suit for Rent and Municipal Taxes in Favor of Landlord in Summary Suit Under Order 37 CPC — Defendant Fails to Appear, Ex Parte Decree Granted. Landlord entitled to recover outstanding rent and municipal taxes from tenant ...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Probate Caveat Case — Real Brother Has Caveatable Interest as Creditor and Under Family Settlement. Section 284 of Indian Succession Act, 1925 interpreted to include persons with slight interest in estate.