Bombay High Court Allows Appeal for Enhanced Compensation in Land Acquisition Case — Market Value Fixed at Rs. 1,00,000 per Hectare Based on Comparable Sale Instance. The court held that the sale instance dated 20.4.1988, just two months before the Section 4 notification, was the best comparable and after deducting 1/3rd for development, the market value was Rs. 1,00,000 per hectare.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY In Favour of Accused
  • 2
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The appellant, Shahadeo s/o Shriram Hingane, owned land bearing Gat No.25 in village Warkhed, Taluka Shegaon, District Buldhana. By a notification dated 25.6.1988 issued under Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, 50 R (approximately 0.5 hectare) of his land was acquired for the construction of the Nagziri-Warkhed road. The Special Land Acquisition Officer passed an award on 18.12.1990 granting compensation at Rs. 10,000 per hectare. Notice of the award under Section 12(2) was given on 10.1.1991. Dissatisfied, the appellant filed a reference petition on 20.2.1991, registered as Land Acquisition Claim No. 94 of 1992, before the Civil Judge (Senior Division), Khamgaon. The Reference Court enhanced the compensation to Rs. 30,000 per hectare. Still aggrieved, the appellant filed the present first appeal seeking further enhancement to Rs. 4,00,000 per hectare. Before the Reference Court, the appellant relied on four sale instances: (a) a 1967 purchase of Survey No.50/2 and 50/2-A at Rs. 2,970 per hectare; (b) a 1975 purchase of the remaining portion of the same survey numbers at Rs. 9,090 per hectare; (c) a 1977 purchase of Gat No.5 in village Warkhed at Rs. 24,000 per hectare; and (d) a sale instance (Exh. 44) dated 20.4.1988 of Gat No.24 in the same village at Rs. 1,50,000 per hectare. The High Court found that the first three instances were too old and not comparable, but the fourth instance, being just two months before the Section 4 notification, was the best comparable. The court held that the market value should be determined at Rs. 1,00,000 per hectare after deducting 1/3rd for development costs from the sale instance rate of Rs. 1,50,000 per hectare. The court allowed the appeal in part, setting aside the Reference Court's award and enhancing compensation to Rs. 1,00,000 per hectare, with all statutory benefits under Section 23(1A), 23(2), and interest under Section 28 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

Headnote

A) Land Acquisition - Market Value Determination - Comparable Sale Instances - Land Acquisition Act, 1894, Sections 23 and 4 - The court considered four sale instances relied upon by the appellant, but found only the fourth instance (Exh. 44) dated 20.4.1988, just two months before the Section 4 notification, to be comparable and reliable. The court held that the market value should be determined at Rs. 1,00,000 per hectare, rejecting the lower rates of earlier instances and the Reference Court's rate of Rs. 30,000 per hectare. (Paras 4-6)

B) Land Acquisition - Enhancement of Compensation - Deduction for Development - Land Acquisition Act, 1894, Section 23 - The court applied a 1/3rd deduction for development costs from the sale instance rate of Rs. 1,50,000 per hectare, arriving at Rs. 1,00,000 per hectare as the market value. The court also granted statutory benefits under Section 23(1A), 23(2), and interest under Section 28 of the Act. (Paras 6-7)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the appellant/claimant is entitled to enhanced compensation for the acquisition of his land, and what is the correct market value of the acquired land as on the date of notification under Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The appeal is partly allowed. The judgment and award of the Reference Court are set aside. The appellant/claimant is entitled to compensation at the rate of Rs. 1,00,000 per hectare for the acquired land, along with all statutory benefits under Section 23(1A), 23(2), and interest under Section 28 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894. No order as to costs.

Law Points

  • Land Acquisition Act
  • 1894
  • Section 23
  • Section 4
  • Section 12(2)
  • market value determination
  • comparable sale instances
  • enhancement of compensation
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2010 LawText (BOM) (01) 194

First Appeal No.434 of 1997

2010-01-12

R. K. Deshpande, J.

Mr. A. B. Patil for appellant, Mr. D. B. Yengal, Assistant Government Pleader for respondent

Shahadeo s/o. Shriram Hingane

State of Maharashtra, through Special Land Acquisition Officer (B & C), Buldhana

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

First appeal against the judgment of the Reference Court in a land acquisition matter seeking enhancement of compensation.

Remedy Sought

The appellant/claimant sought enhancement of compensation from Rs. 30,000 per hectare (awarded by Reference Court) to Rs. 4,00,000 per hectare for the acquired land.

Filing Reason

Dissatisfaction with the compensation awarded by the Special Land Acquisition Officer and the Reference Court.

Previous Decisions

The Special Land Acquisition Officer awarded Rs. 10,000 per hectare on 18.12.1990. The Reference Court enhanced it to Rs. 30,000 per hectare.

Issues

Whether the appellant is entitled to enhanced compensation for the acquisition of his land? What is the correct market value of the acquired land as on the date of notification under Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894?

Submissions/Arguments

The appellant argued that the Reference Court erred in not considering the sale instance (Exh. 44) dated 20.4.1988, which was just two months before the Section 4 notification and showed a rate of Rs. 1,50,000 per hectare. The respondent/State supported the Reference Court's award and argued that the sale instances relied upon by the appellant were not comparable.

Ratio Decidendi

The market value of the acquired land should be determined based on the best comparable sale instance, which in this case was the sale of Gat No.24 dated 20.4.1988 at Rs. 1,50,000 per hectare, being just two months before the Section 4 notification. After deducting 1/3rd for development costs, the market value is fixed at Rs. 1,00,000 per hectare.

Judgment Excerpts

The fourth sale instance is the best comparable, as it is just two months prior to the notification under Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act. After deducting 1/3rd towards the development charges, the market value of the acquired land would be Rs. 1,00,000/- per hectare.

Procedural History

Notification under Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 dated 25.6.1988. Award by Special Land Acquisition Officer on 18.12.1990 granting Rs. 10,000 per hectare. Notice under Section 12(2) on 10.1.1991. Reference petition filed on 20.2.1991, registered as Land Acquisition Claim No. 94 of 1992. Reference Court enhanced compensation to Rs. 30,000 per hectare. Appellant filed First Appeal No.434 of 1997 before the Bombay High Court, Nagpur Bench.

Acts & Sections

  • Land Acquisition Act, 1894: Section 4, Section 12(2), Section 23, Section 23(1A), Section 23(2), Section 28
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Appeal for Enhanced Compensation in Land Acquisition Case — Market Value Fixed at Rs. 1,00,000 per Hectare Based on Comparable Sale Instance. The court held that the sale instance dated 20.4.1988, just two months before the...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Accused in Rape Trial to Cross-Examine Prosecutrix on Specific Relationship with Co-Accused — Questions on Past Specific Relationship Not Barred by Section 146 Evidence Act Proviso. The Court held that the proviso to Sectio...