Bombay High Court Modifies Interim Stay Condition in Eviction Appeal — Reduces Deposit Amount to Rs.1,000 per Month. The court, by consent, set aside the condition of depositing Rs.25,000 and directed the petitioner to deposit only Rs.1,000 per month from the date of eviction decree.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY
  • 5
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Prayagbai Digambar Jawale, a peon in Zilla Parishad School, filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court at Aurangabad challenging an interim order passed by the learned Adhoc Additional District Judge, Osmanabad, in RCA No. 90/2009. The first appellate court had granted a stay of the eviction decree in favor of the petitioner on condition that she deposit Rs.25,000 and further Rs.1,000 per month towards rent. The petitioner sought modification of these conditions. By consent of both parties, the High Court set aside the condition requiring deposit of Rs.25,000. The petitioner was directed to deposit only Rs.1,000 per month from the date of the eviction decree, i.e., 1.4.2009, onwards. The arrears were to be deposited within two months. The petition was disposed of accordingly.

Headnote

A) Civil Procedure - Interim Stay - Eviction Decree - Condition of Deposit - The first appellate court granted stay of eviction decree on condition of depositing Rs.25,000 and Rs.1,000 per month towards rent. The High Court, by consent, set aside the condition of depositing Rs.25,000 and directed the petitioner to deposit only Rs.1,000 per month from the date of eviction decree (1.4.2009) onwards, with arrears to be deposited within two months. (Paras 1-4)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the condition imposed by the first appellate court for depositing Rs.25,000 and Rs.1,000 per month as a condition for stay of eviction decree should be modified.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The petition is disposed of by consent. The condition for depositing Rs.25,000 as enumerated in the impugned order is set aside. The petitioner will be required to deposit only Rs.1,000 per month from the date of the eviction decree i.e. 1.4.2009 onwards. The arrears shall be deposited within a period of two months.

Law Points

  • Interim stay
  • eviction decree
  • condition of deposit
  • modification by consent
  • Rent Control Act
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2010 LawText (BOM) (01) 10

Writ Petition No.6979 of 2009

2010-01-07

V.R. Kingaonkar

Mr. S.S. Choudhari for petitioner, Mr. S.B. Rohile for respondent

Prayagbai W/o Digambar Jawale

Rajkumar S/o Appasaheb Shinde

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition challenging interim order of first appellate court imposing conditions for stay of eviction decree.

Remedy Sought

Petitioner sought modification of conditions imposed by the first appellate court for stay of eviction decree.

Filing Reason

The first appellate court granted stay of eviction decree on condition of depositing Rs.25,000 and Rs.1,000 per month, which the petitioner found onerous.

Previous Decisions

The first appellate court in RCA No. 90/2009 granted stay of eviction decree on condition of depositing Rs.25,000 and Rs.1,000 per month towards rent.

Issues

Whether the condition of depositing Rs.25,000 as a condition for stay of eviction decree should be modified.

Submissions/Arguments

By consent, the condition for depositing Rs.25,000 was set aside.

Ratio Decidendi

By consent of parties, the condition of depositing Rs.25,000 was set aside, and the petitioner was directed to deposit only Rs.1,000 per month from the date of eviction decree.

Judgment Excerpts

The petition is being finally disposed of by consent of the counsel for the parties. By consent, the condition for depositing Rs.25,000 (Rupees twenty five thousand) as enumerated in the impugned order is set aside.

Procedural History

The petitioner filed a writ petition in the High Court challenging the interim order of the first appellate court in RCA No. 90/2009, which had granted stay of eviction decree on condition of depositing Rs.25,000 and Rs.1,000 per month. The High Court disposed of the petition by consent, modifying the condition.

Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Modifies Interim Stay Condition in Eviction Appeal — Reduces Deposit Amount to Rs.1,000 per Month. The court, by consent, set aside the condition of depositing Rs.25,000 and directed the petitioner to deposit only Rs.1,000 per mon...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Electricity Board's Petition Challenging Injunction Against Disconnection for Non-Payment of Arrears. Inherent Powers Under Section 151 CPC Cannot Be Used to Restrain Disconnection Under Section 56 of Electricity Act, 2003.