High Court of Karnataka Allows Transfer of Divorce Petition Under Section 24 CPC on Grounds of Convenience and Hardship to Wife. The court held that the convenience of the wife, who is a woman, should be considered and that the distance of 130 kms justified the transfer.

High Court: Karnataka High Court Bench: BENGALURU In Favour of Prosecution
  • 1
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Smt. Sushmitha B.L. @ Uma, filed a petition under Section 24 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, seeking transfer of M.C. No. 7/2023 pending before the Senior Civil Judge and JMFC, Narasimharajapura, Chikkamagaluru District, to the Senior Civil Judge and JMFC, Hosanagara, Shivamogga District. The petitioner is the legally wedded wife of the respondent, Sri. Raghavendra B.R., and they have two children. Due to disputes, they are residing separately. The respondent filed a petition for dissolution of marriage, which is pending as M.C. No. 7/2023. The petitioner resides at Hosanagara Taluk, Shivamogga District, which is about 130 kms away from Narasimharajapura. She contended that she faces difficulty in attending court on each date of hearing. The respondent opposed the transfer, arguing that the petition was filed only to harass him. The court, after hearing both sides, observed that the convenience of the wife, who is a woman, should be given due weight. The distance of 130 kms and the hardship faced by the petitioner justified the transfer. The court allowed the petition and directed the transfer of M.C. No. 7/2023 from the Senior Civil Judge, Narasimharajapura to the Senior Civil Judge, Hosanagara. The court also directed the transferee court to dispose of the case expeditiously.

Headnote

A) Civil Procedure - Transfer of Proceedings - Section 24 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 - Convenience of Parties - The petitioner-wife sought transfer of divorce petition from Narasimharajapura to Hosanagara due to distance of 130 kms and difficulty in attending court. The court allowed the transfer, holding that the convenience of the wife, who is a woman, should be considered and that the distance and hardship justified the transfer. (Paras 2-4)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the divorce petition pending before the Senior Civil Judge, Narasimharajapura should be transferred to the Senior Civil Judge, Hosanagara on the ground of inconvenience and hardship faced by the wife-petitioner.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The court allowed the petition and directed the transfer of M.C. No. 7/2023 from the Court of Senior Civil Judge, Narasimharajapura, Chikkamagaluru District to the Court of Senior Civil Judge, Hosanagara, Shivamogga District. The transferee court is directed to dispose of the case expeditiously.

Law Points

  • Transfer of proceedings
  • convenience of parties
  • hardship to wife
  • Section 24 CPC
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2025 LawText (KAR) (01) 1

Civil Petition No. 370 of 2024

2025-01-07

Dr. Justice Chillakur Sumalatha

NC: 2025:KHC:263

Sri. Murali B. S. for petitioner, Sri. Nagalingappa K. for respondent

Smt. Sushmitha B. L. @ Uma

Sri. Raghavendra B. R.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Civil petition for transfer of divorce proceedings under Section 24 of CPC

Remedy Sought

Petitioner seeks withdrawal and transfer of M.C. No. 7/2023 from Senior Civil Judge, Narasimharajapura to Senior Civil Judge, Hosanagara

Filing Reason

Petitioner, wife, faces difficulty in attending court at Narasimharajapura due to distance of 130 kms from her residence

Issues

Whether the divorce petition should be transferred on grounds of convenience and hardship to the wife-petitioner

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner's counsel submitted that the petitioner is the legally wedded wife, resides at Hosanagara, distance of 130 kms from Narasimharajapura, causing difficulty to attend court. Respondent's counsel opposed the transfer, stating that the petition is filed only to harass the respondent.

Ratio Decidendi

The convenience of the wife, who is a woman, should be given due weight. The distance of 130 kms and the hardship faced by the petitioner in attending court justifies the transfer of the divorce petition under Section 24 CPC.

Judgment Excerpts

The petitioner thus is facing much difficulty to attend the Court on each and every date of hearing. The convenience of the wife who is a woman should be considered.

Procedural History

The petitioner filed a petition under Section 24 CPC seeking transfer of M.C. No. 7/2023 pending before the Senior Civil Judge, Narasimharajapura to the Senior Civil Judge, Hosanagara. The petition was heard and disposed of by this order.

Acts & Sections

  • Code of Civil Procedure, 1908: Section 24
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Karnataka Allows Transfer of Divorce Petition Under Section 24 CPC on Grounds of Convenience and Hardship to Wife. The court held that the convenience of the wife, who is a woman, should be considered and that the distance of 130 kms ju...
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Bombay Allows Appeal of Commissioner of Central Excise in Central Excise Penalty Case — CESTAT Erred in Holding No Provision for Penalty Under Central Excise Act or Rules. Rule 209 of Central Excise Rules, 1944 Provides for Penalty fo...